Head-to-head Updated

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 vs Vredestein Ultrac Vorti — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 21 + 14 road tests and 12,714 + 192 owner reviews. How we score

Too close to call: Pilot Sport 4 and Ultrac Vorti are level at 81.

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Michelin Pilot Sport 4
Tire AMichelin

Pilot Sport 4

Summer

± 4

Tests 85 · 21 tests Owners 76 · 12,714 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 45 in 2019 Summer 53 Tyre Braking Shootout (dry braking)

“Those are Pilot sport 4 (all season). If it had s after the 4 it would be the summer high performance version. I put the pilot sport 4 on wife's GTI autobahn 2016. Great handling tire, stiff side walls, not the smoothest ride but best overall.”

Vredestein Ultrac Vorti

Ultrac Vorti

Summer

± 5

Tests 79 · 14 tests Owners 84 · 192 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 20 in 2020 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test (dry handling)

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

Key facts

  • In 8 tests that measured dry braking for both, Pilot Sport 4 won 5 and Ultrac Vorti won 2 (average 99% vs 98% of the best).
  • In 8 tests that measured wet braking for both, Pilot Sport 4 won 7 and Ultrac Vorti won 1 (average 97% vs 93% of the best).
  • In 6 tests that measured wet handling for both, Pilot Sport 4 won 5 and Ultrac Vorti won 1 (average 99% vs 98% of the best).
  • In 6 tests that measured noise for both, Pilot Sport 4 won 4 and Ultrac Vorti won 2 (average 99% vs 99% of the best).
  • In 5 tests that measured dry handling for both, Pilot Sport 4 won 2 and Ultrac Vorti won 2 (average 99% vs 100% of the best).
  1. 87

    Dry

    Pilot Sport 4 +1
    86
    Why this score
    SourcePilot Sport 4Ultrac Vorti
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 20 / 13 tests8983
    Reviews found online8489
    Dry Braking (% of best) · 8 shared tests · wins 5–299%98%
    Dry Handling (% of best) · 5 shared tests · wins 2–299%100%
    Dry Handling (tester's mark) (% of best) · 2 shared tests · wins 2–090%73%

    Pilot Sport 4: 60% × 89.3 + 40% × 83.9 = 87

    Ultrac Vorti: 60% × 83.5 + 40% × 89.1 = 86

  2. 89

    Wet

    Pilot Sport 4 +5
    84
    Why this score
    SourcePilot Sport 4Ultrac Vorti
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 20 / 13 tests9283
    Reviews found online8485
    Straight Aquaplaning (% of best) · 5 shared tests · wins 5–0100%97%
    Wet Handling (tester's mark) (% of best) · 2 shared tests · wins 2–0100%80%
    Wet Braking (% of best) · 8 shared tests · wins 7–197%93%
    Wet Handling (% of best) · 6 shared tests · wins 5–199%98%

    Pilot Sport 4: 60% × 92.5 + 40% × 84.4 = 89

    Ultrac Vorti: 60% × 83.2 + 40% × 84.5 = 84

  3. 76

    Comfort

    Ultrac Vorti +3
    79
    Why this score
    SourcePilot Sport 4Ultrac Vorti
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 6 / 4 tests8277
    Reviews found online7281
    Comfort (tester's mark) (% of best) · 2 shared tests · wins 1–0100%78%

    Pilot Sport 4: 40% × 81.6 + 60% × 71.7 = 76

    Ultrac Vorti: 40% × 76.6 + 60% × 81.1 = 79

  4. 70

    Noise

    Pilot Sport 4 +1
    69
    Why this score
    SourcePilot Sport 4Ultrac Vorti
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 13 / 9 tests7371
    Reviews found online≈ 66 (est.)≈ 66 (est.)
    Noise (% of best) · 6 shared tests · wins 4–299%99%

    Pilot Sport 4: 60% × 73.2 + 40% × 66.4 (est.) = 70

    Ultrac Vorti: 60% × 70.8 + 40% × 66.4 (est.) = 69

    No owner ratings of noise for Pilot Sport 4 or Ultrac Vorti. The owner half is the owners’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.

  5. 71

    Treadwear

    Ultrac Vorti +3
    74
    Why this score
    SourcePilot Sport 4Ultrac Vorti
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 3 / 3 tests7872
    Reviews found online6078
    Wear (% of best) · 3 shared tests · wins 3–088%78%

    Pilot Sport 4: 60% × 78.1 + 40% × 59.5 = 71

    Ultrac Vorti: 60% × 71.7 + 40% × 78.3 = 74

  6. 81

    Handling (owners)

    Ultrac Vorti +6
    87
    Why this score
    SourcePilot Sport 4Ultrac Vorti
    Reviews found online8187
  7. 76

    Efficiency

    Pilot Sport 4 +52
    24
    Why this score
    SourcePilot Sport 4Ultrac Vorti
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 14 / 9 tests7624
    Rolling Resistance (% of best) · 5 shared tests · wins 5–089%78%
Scores at a glance
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 vs Vredestein Ultrac Vorti: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryMichelin Pilot Sport 4Vredestein Ultrac Vorti
Relative Score 81 81
Dry 87 86
Wet 89 84
Comfort 76 79
Noise 70 69
Treadwear 71 74
Handling (owners) 81 87
Efficiency 76 24

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
± 4

Pilot Sport 4

± 5

Ultrac Vorti

The professional test results behind the scores

Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.

In the overall rankings of 11 tests that ran both, Michelin Pilot Sport 4 finished ahead 11 times and Vredestein Ultrac Vorti 0 times.

DisciplineCategoryPilot Sport 4Ultrac VortiΔHead-to-head
Dry Braking Dry 99% 98% +1.7 5–2 in 8 shared tests Newest: 2020 Tyre Market Overview Braking Test · 245/45 R18
Dry Handling Dry 99% 100% −0.1 2–2 in 5 shared tests Newest: 2020 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test · 245/45 R18
Dry Handling (tester's mark) Dry 90% 73% +17.5 2–0 in 2 shared tests Newest: 2018 Test World Summer Tyre Test · 225/45 R17
Straight Aquaplaning Wet 100% 97% +3.0 5–0 in 5 shared tests Newest: 2020 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test · 245/45 R18
Wet Braking Wet 97% 93% +4.3 7–1 in 8 shared tests Newest: 2020 Tyre Market Overview Braking Test · 245/45 R18
Wet Handling Wet 99% 98% +1.2 5–1 in 6 shared tests Newest: 2020 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test · 245/45 R18
Wet Handling (tester's mark) Wet 100% 80% +20.0 2–0 in 2 shared tests Newest: 2018 Test World Summer Tyre Test · 225/45 R17
Comfort (tester's mark) Comfort 100% 78% +22.2 1–0 in 2 shared tests Newest: 2019 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test · 225/45 R17
Noise Noise 99% 99% +0.2 4–2 in 6 shared tests Newest: 2020 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test · 245/45 R18
Wear Treadwear 88% 78% +10.1 3–0 in 3 shared tests Newest: 2020 ADAC 18 Inch Summer Tyre Test · 225/40 R18
Rolling Resistance Efficiency 89% 78% +11.0 5–0 in 5 shared tests Newest: 2020 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test · 245/45 R18
Also published by the testers (not in the score)
Price Cost 58% 78% −19.6 0–3 in 3 shared tests Newest: 2020 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test · 245/45 R18
Total Cost of Ownership Cost #16/20 #14/20 – 1–1 in 2 shared tests Newest: 2020 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test · 245/45 R18
Value Cost 64% 77% −12.8 0–2 in 2 shared tests Newest: 2020 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test · 245/45 R18
Overall Ranking Overall #2/14 #7/14 – 11–0 in 11 shared tests Newest: 2020 TCS Summer Tire Test R18 · 225/40R18

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Pilot Sport 4

Pros

  • Exceptional wet and dry traction with outstanding resistance to aquaplaning
  • Noticeable improvement in ride comfort and a reduction in cabin noise compared to standard run-flat tires
  • Progressive and predictable breakaway limits during spirited driving

Cons

  • Faster-than-average treadwear, particularly under aggressive driving or on rear-wheel-drive performance cars
  • Softer sidewalls can lead to a slight lack of initial steering precision and a vague feel at the limit for hardcore enthusiasts
  • Performance drops off significantly in cold, freezing, or snowy winter conditions
All owner themes in the Pilot Sport 4 review

Tire B Ultrac Vorti

Pros

  • Outstanding dry grip and cornering stability
  • High value for money compared to top-tier premium brands
  • Excellent steering feedback and driver confidence

Cons

  • Rapid tread wear reported by some aggressive drivers or on heavy rear-wheel-drive/high-power vehicles
  • Wet weather traction and aquaplaning resistance considered inferior to top competitors like Michelin or Continental by a minority of users
  • Stiff sidewalls on low-profile sizes can negatively impact comfort or lead to cupping
All owner themes in the Ultrac Vorti review

What real owners are saying

From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score

Tire A

Michelin Pilot Sport 4

Positive

The community widely regards the Michelin Pilot Sport 4 line as a premium upgrade offering exceptional dry and wet grip, precise handling, and superior ride comfort compared to OEM or run-flat tires. While celebrated for performance, users frequently discuss its high price tag, faster treadwear, and noticeable drop in EV efficiency. Some drivers also note increased road noise and reduced traction when temperatures drop near freezing.

r/JettaGLI ·59 upvotes ·2026-09-27

“Reminder: Tires are the key to this car Just replaced my Michelin Pilot Sport 4 AS tires with a new set ahead of the rainy season. Lasted 36K miles. It was the best mod to the car and a fresh set reminded just how good a brand new set is. The car is glued to the road, riding wonderfully smooth and quiet. Spend the money, get the best tires for you. The tune can wait. And it will need it.”

r/BoltEV ·5 upvotes ·2026-04-29

“Michelin Pilot Sport 4 tires are noisy (a followup) I have been asked on this sub if the PS4 tires on my wife’s Bolt are noisy, and I wasn’t sure how to answer. Well, we made two 60-mile round trips this past weekend, mostly on highways with 55 and 70 mph speed limits, and I have to say that the tires are kind of noisy. Certainly not as quiet as EV-oriented tires are. The grip is fantastic, so we really like them. If you are sensitive to noise, though, these Max Performance class tires are probably not for you.”

f30.bimmerpost.com

“Quote: Originally Posted by weston.__ I will be going down the non-rft route, Pilot Sport 4. You're not the only one to say the ride quality with non-rft is a massive improvement and this is the reason why I will change once the time comes. I went from Bridgestone S001 RFT to 'go-flats' and have found the suppleness an obvious difference. Since I put the pressure to the mid point between the low and high load plated pressures I have yet to have any of the heartstopping thumps come through the suspension that the Bridgestone seemed prone to.”

Top themes
#Wet and dry grip#Run-flat replacement upgrade#Treadwear and longevity#Cold weather performance#Road noise and comfort#EV range and efficiency#Comparison to Continental tires

Based on 246 community posts

Tire B

Vredestein Ultrac Vorti

We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Michelin Pilot Sport 4 B · Vredestein Ultrac Vorti
CategorySummerSummer
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available6242
Rim diameters16″ – 20″18″ – 24″
UTQG300 - 320 A - AA A—
Sizes in common1616

Which one should you actually buy?

Michelin Pilot Sport 4

Vredestein Ultrac Vorti

Too close to call: Michelin Pilot Sport 4 and Vredestein Ultrac Vorti are within 2 points overall. Michelin Pilot Sport 4 is stronger on efficiency and wet. Vredestein Ultrac Vorti is stronger on handling, comfort and treadwear.

Pick tire A You want lower fuel or energy use

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 scores 76 vs 24 on efficiency.

Pick tire B You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Vredestein Ultrac Vorti scores 87 vs 81 on handling.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 scores 89 vs 84 on wet.

Pick tire B You want the most comfortable ride

Vredestein Ultrac Vorti scores 79 vs 76 on comfort.

Tire A · Michelin Pilot Sport 4
Tire B · Vredestein Ultrac Vorti

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Pilot Sport 4 or Ultrac Vorti?

Which is better in the wet, Pilot Sport 4 or Ultrac Vorti?

Michelin Pilot Sport 4, 89 vs 84 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, Pilot Sport 4 or Ultrac Vorti?

Neither, by our numbers: 87 vs 86 on the dry score, within 3 points.

Which is quieter, Pilot Sport 4 or Ultrac Vorti?

Neither, by our numbers: 70 vs 69 on the noise score, within 3 points.

Which is more comfortable, Pilot Sport 4 or Ultrac Vorti?

Vredestein Ultrac Vorti, 79 vs 76 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, Pilot Sport 4 or Ultrac Vorti?

Vredestein Ultrac Vorti, 74 vs 71 on our treadwear score.

Which rolls more easily, Pilot Sport 4 or Ultrac Vorti?

Michelin Pilot Sport 4, 76 vs 24 on our efficiency score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology