Tests – · none yet Owners 63 · 211 reviews
“for the price, theyre pretty decent. theyre not the stickiest tires available, but theyre alright and imo, theyre pretty predictable when nearing their limits.”
Head-to-head
Updated
Falken FK452 vs Michelin Pilot Sport 5 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 0 + 23 road tests and 211 + 6,449 owner reviews. How we score
Pilot Sport 5 is ahead, 86–65
Add your size for an exact match
/R
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 84 · 23 tests Owners 82 · 6,449 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 20 in 2026 Autobild Summer Tyre Test (subj. dry handling)
“Put some 235/45 R17 ps5’s on my 9-5 They fill up the arches quite nice!”
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
66
Dry
Pilot Sport 5 +2389Why this score
Source FK452 Pilot Sport 5 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 23 tests ≈ 66 (est.) 92 Reviews found online 65 84 FK452: 60% × 66.5 (est.) + 40% × 64.6 = 66
Pilot Sport 5: 60% × 92.2 + 40% × 83.8 = 89
No road tests of dry for FK452. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).
-
67
Wet
Pilot Sport 5 +2390Why this score
Source FK452 Pilot Sport 5 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 23 tests ≈ 68 (est.) 92 Reviews found online 66 87 FK452: 60% × 67.6 (est.) + 40% × 65.9 = 67
Pilot Sport 5: 60% × 92.4 + 40% × 86.7 = 90
No road tests of wet for FK452. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).
-
66
Comfort
Pilot Sport 5 +975Why this score
Source FK452 Pilot Sport 5 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 9 tests ≈ 68 (est.) 71 Reviews found online 62 81 FK452: 60% × 67.9 (est.) + 40% × 62.1 = 66
Pilot Sport 5: 60% × 71 + 40% × 80.6 = 75
No road tests of comfort for FK452. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
–
Noise
No comparison47Why this score
Source FK452 Pilot Sport 5 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 15 tests – 33 Reviews found online – ≈ 67 (est.) Pilot Sport 5: 60% × 33.2 + 40% × 67.3 (est.) = 47
No owner ratings of noise for Pilot Sport 5. The owner half is the owners’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.
-
61
Treadwear
Pilot Sport 5 +2182Why this score
Source FK452 Pilot Sport 5 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 6 tests ≈ 63 (est.) 87 Reviews found online 58 75 FK452: 60% × 63.3 (est.) + 40% × 58.2 = 61
Pilot Sport 5: 60% × 87.2 + 40% × 74.7 = 82
No road tests of treadwear for FK452. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).
-
64
Handling (owners)
Pilot Sport 5 +1983Why this score
Source FK452 Pilot Sport 5 Reviews found online 64 83
Scores at a glance
| Category | Falken FK452 | Michelin Pilot Sport 5 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 65 | 86 |
| Dry | 66 | 89 |
| Wet | 67 | 90 |
| Comfort | 66 | 75 |
| Noise | – | 47 |
| Treadwear | 61 | 82 |
| Handling (owners) | 64 | 83 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
65
/ 100
FK452
86
/ 100
Pilot Sport 5
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A FK452
Pros
- Exceptional value for money compared to premium competitors
- Strong dry and wet traction for spirited driving
- Predictable and progressive breakaway characteristics
Cons
- High levels of road noise, often described as a 'hum' or 'bearing-like' sound
- Rapid and sometimes uneven tread wear
- Soft sidewalls leading to vague steering feel or 'gelatinous' handling
Tire B Pilot Sport 5
Pros
- Outstanding wet and dry traction with high resistance to aquaplaning
- Superior tread life and longevity compared to competitors and previous generations
- Noticeable improvements in ride comfort and a quieter cabin over rough road surfaces
Cons
- Softer sidewalls can lead to initial steering vagueness or understeer during hard cornering
- Higher price point compared to some tier-one competitors
- Performance and grip degrade significantly under intense track heat or heavy circuit use
What real owners are saying
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Tire A
Positive
Falken FK452
Community opinion on the Falken FK452 is generally favorable, with many drivers praising its balance of solid wet and dry grip, low road noise, and accessible pricing. While regarded as a dependable daily performance tire that also stretches well, notable drawbacks cited by owners include fast tread wear on sports cars, tendency to flat-spot when sitting, and degradation in grip and road noise as the tread gets low.
g42.bimmerpost.com
“for the price, theyre pretty decent. theyre not the stickiest tires available, but theyre alright and imo, theyre pretty predictable when nearing their limits.”
rx8club.com
“Dude, I had pretty much the same choice as you... same rims, same vendors, same car Many reviews mentioned that T1Rs have softer sidewall than FK452, thus preferring the steering feel of Falken when you push it in the curves. As for daily driver it probably doesn't make a difference. Also, are you planning to have a different set for the winter? If not, you'll need all seasons. 1010tires . com have plenty of real-world user reviews on those tires. Also, search Google, there were some interesting reviews on BMW & Audi forums.”
avforums.com
·2012-03-02
“I also have Falken FK452 on my MKII Focus Diesel, in 225/40/18. They're really quite excellent tyres in both wet and dry to be quite honest. Seeing as the Focus isn't really that "sporting", I was quite happy to get 29'000 miles out of the set I last had at the front, which was a lot more than the 14'000 or so I got out of the Goodyear Eagle F1 (but the F1 was sticky as anything!). Only issue: they're not as cheap as they once were. People are getting wise to their performance for the rather sensible price, and I've seen them creep up around £25 a corner for me in the last two years.”
Top themes
#wet and dry grip#value and price#treadwear and longevity#tire stretch fitment#road noise and NVH#sidewall stiffness
Based on 47 community posts
Tire B
Positive
Michelin Pilot Sport 5
Community opinion on the Michelin Pilot Sport 5 is overwhelmingly positive for daily street driving, praising its exceptional wet grip, tread longevity, and quiet comfort compared to run-flats and older performance tires. However, several enthusiasts note downsides for aggressive or track use, specifically citing softer sidewalls, muted steering feedback, and poor heat resistance leading to delamination under track conditions. Most drivers consider it an outstanding premium all-rounder for sporty street cars rather than a dedicated track or extreme-performance tire.
r/DubaiPetrolHeads
·3 upvotes ·2025-07-15
“Had both on my ST. The 4S is more performance oriented but it wore out much quicker in approximately 35k kms. PS5 is more comfortable and the wear is slower however it does get noisy towards its end of life. After the 2 sets of Michelins, I tried the Falken FK520 for half the cost of the Michelins but found it to more comfortable for daily driving as it is comparatively softer.”
cliosport.net
·5 upvotes ·2024-02-07
“I’ve done 20k on a set of fronts that still have ~2-2.5mm left. They’re wearing very well IMO.”
f30.bimmerpost.com
“I've used the PS4S, potenza s001's & sports contact 7. Currently on Pilot Sport 5's and I think they're the best all road "do it all"road tyre I've had on my RWD . The asymmetric 6 is also supposed to be great but I havent tried that.”
Top themes
#wet grip performance#tread wear longevity#daily driving comfort#track heat delamination#soft sidewall steering feedback#road noise levels#comparison with ps4s
Based on 174 community posts
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Falken FK452 | B · Michelin Pilot Sport 5 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | — | 66 |
| Rim diameters | — | 16″ – 22″ |
Which one should you actually buy?
65
/ 100
Falken FK452
86
/ 100
Michelin Pilot Sport 5
Winner: Michelin Pilot Sport 5 — better dry, wet and treadwear. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Pick tire B
You want the most grip on dry roads
Michelin Pilot Sport 5 scores 89 vs 66 on dry.
Pick tire B
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Michelin Pilot Sport 5 scores 90 vs 67 on wet.
Pick tire B
You want the longest tread life
Michelin Pilot Sport 5 scores 82 vs 61 on treadwear.
Pick tire B
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Michelin Pilot Sport 5 scores 83 vs 64 on handling.
Tire A · Falken FK452
Tire B · Michelin Pilot Sport 5
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
FK452 or Pilot Sport 5?
Which is better in the wet, FK452 or Pilot Sport 5?
Michelin Pilot Sport 5, 90 vs 67 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, FK452 or Pilot Sport 5?
Michelin Pilot Sport 5, 89 vs 66 on our dry score.
Which is more comfortable, FK452 or Pilot Sport 5?
Michelin Pilot Sport 5, 75 vs 66 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, FK452 or Pilot Sport 5?
Michelin Pilot Sport 5, 82 vs 61 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology