Head-to-head Updated

Falken FK452 vs Kumho Crugen HP91 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 2 road tests and 211 + 840 owner reviews. How we score

Crugen HP91 is ahead, 69–64

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Falken FK452
Tire AFalken

FK452

Summer

± 8

Tests – · none yet Owners 62 · 211 reviews

“for the price, theyre pretty decent. theyre not the stickiest tires available, but theyre alright and imo, theyre pretty predictable when nearing their limits.”

Kumho Crugen HP91
Tire BKumho

Crugen HP91

Summer

± 8

Tests 68 · 2 tests Owners 71 · 840 reviews

Best test result: #3 of 8 in 2018 All Road 265/60 R18 4x4 Tyre Test (noise)

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 65

    Dry

    Crugen HP91 +3
    68
    Why this score
    SourceFK452Crugen HP91
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 2 tests≈ 66 (est.)64
    Reviews found online6475

    FK452: 60% × 66.4 (est.) + 40% × 64.1 = 65

    Crugen HP91: 60% × 63.7 + 40% × 74.7 = 68

    No road tests of dry for FK452. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).

  2. 67

    Wet

    Crugen HP91 +6
    73
    Why this score
    SourceFK452Crugen HP91
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 2 tests≈ 68 (est.)70
    Reviews found online6578

    FK452: 60% × 67.7 (est.) + 40% × 65.2 = 67

    Crugen HP91: 60% × 69.8 + 40% × 77.7 = 73

    No road tests of wet for FK452. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. 63

    Comfort

    Crugen HP91 +6
    69
    Why this score
    SourceFK452Crugen HP91
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 67 (est.)≈ 69 (est.)
    Reviews found online6069

    FK452: 40% × 67 (est.) + 60% × 60.3 = 63

    Crugen HP91: 40% × 68.7 (est.) + 60% × 68.8 = 69

    No road tests of comfort for FK452. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

    No road tests of comfort for Crugen HP91. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

  4. –

    Noise

    No comparison
    70
    Why this score
    SourceFK452Crugen HP91
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests–73
    Reviews found online–≈ 66 (est.)

    Crugen HP91: 60% × 73.1 + 40% × 66.3 (est.) = 70

    No owner ratings of noise for Crugen HP91. The owner half is the owners’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.

  5. 60

    Treadwear

    Crugen HP91 +2
    62
    Why this score
    SourceFK452Crugen HP91
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 63 (est.)≈ 64 (est.)
    Reviews found online5659

    FK452: 60% × 62.7 (est.) + 40% × 55.7 = 60

    Crugen HP91: 60% × 63.9 (est.) + 40% × 59.2 = 62

    No road tests of treadwear for FK452. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

    No road tests of treadwear for Crugen HP91. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

  6. 63

    Handling (owners)

    Crugen HP91 +9
    72
    Why this score
    SourceFK452Crugen HP91
    Reviews found online6372
  7. –

    Efficiency

    No comparison
    67
    Why this score
    SourceFK452Crugen HP91
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests–67
Scores at a glance
Falken FK452 vs Kumho Crugen HP91: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryFalken FK452Kumho Crugen HP91
Relative Score 64 69
Dry 65 68
Wet 67 73
Comfort 63 69
Noise – 70
Treadwear 60 62
Handling (owners) 63 72
Efficiency – 67

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Recomputed
Headline score
± 8

FK452

± 8

Crugen HP91

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A FK452

Pros

  • Exceptional value for money compared to premium competitors
  • Strong dry and wet traction for spirited driving
  • Predictable and progressive breakaway characteristics

Cons

  • High levels of road noise, often described as a 'hum' or 'bearing-like' sound
  • Rapid and sometimes uneven tread wear
  • Soft sidewalls leading to vague steering feel or 'gelatinous' handling
All owner themes in the FK452 review

Tire B Crugen HP91

Pros

  • Strong wet and dry traction providing high confidence
  • Competitive, budget-friendly pricing compared to tier-1 premium brands
  • Low road noise and enhanced ride comfort

Cons

  • Accelerated tread wear reported by some aggressive drivers or heavy vehicle owners
  • Occasional complaints regarding poor performance in deep snow or ice
  • Minor instances of increased road noise or vibration for a few users
All owner themes in the Crugen HP91 review

What real owners are saying

From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score

Tire A

Falken FK452

Positive

Community opinion on the Falken FK452 is generally favorable, with many drivers praising its balance of solid wet and dry grip, low road noise, and accessible pricing. While regarded as a dependable daily performance tire that also stretches well, notable drawbacks cited by owners include fast tread wear on sports cars, tendency to flat-spot when sitting, and degradation in grip and road noise as the tread gets low.

evolutionm.net

“summer tires. Currently run these. Not as good as the a046 advans as they seem to flex a bit more. A buddy who owns a VIP shop runs those tires on their cars because they can stretch them easily(i.e. softer sidewalls). With that said they are great daily tires with some good grip for what they are designed.”

5series.net

“Quote: Originally Posted by sdg1871 Hankooks are usually cheaper from Tire Rack than from tire shops. Many members have and like the Falkens. I've been going to my tire guy for a long time now, and he always gives me $10.00 less per tire than the lowest price I can find on the net, including tirerack. This $10.00 less also includes roadforce balancing and an alignment. He gives me a good deal, thats for sure. I'll be sure to post my thoughts about them once I get them on.”

rx8club.com

“I realize there are already a few threads regarding this question, but I'm purchasing a new set of Gram Lights 57F - 18 x 8.5 from therpmstore . com and I could use some help finding the right tires. I'm planning on getting a wider tire and going with 245/40/18. I'm sure someone will recommend otherwise, but I've narrowed down my choices to the Toyo Proxes T1R and the Falken FK452. With the shipping at around $40 to NJ, the best prices I've found are from EdgeRacing . com . Toyo Proxes T1R - $157 Falken FK452 - $135 It seems like just as many people like the Toyo's as the Falken's, so I'm thinking about saving the $88 and go with the Falken's, but I would appreciate some more opinions. And, if someone can find a better price for me, that would be great too. Thanks in advance.”

Top themes
#wet and dry grip#value and price#treadwear and longevity#tire stretch fitment#road noise and NVH#sidewall stiffness

Based on 47 community posts

Tire B

Kumho Crugen HP91

We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Falken FK452 B · Kumho Crugen HP91
CategorySummerSummer
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverSUV and 4x4
Sizes available—34
Rim diameters—16″ – 22″
Tread depth—10/32″
UTQG300 AA A420 A A
Sidewall—Blackwall
Max pressure—51 psi

Which one should you actually buy?

Falken FK452

Kumho Crugen HP91

Winner: Kumho Crugen HP91 — better handling, wet and comfort. It leads or ties in every category we score.

Pick tire B You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Kumho Crugen HP91 scores 72 vs 63 on handling.

Pick tire B Your priority is wet-weather safety

Kumho Crugen HP91 scores 73 vs 67 on wet.

Pick tire B You want the most comfortable ride

Kumho Crugen HP91 scores 69 vs 63 on comfort.

Pick tire B You want the most grip on dry roads

Kumho Crugen HP91 scores 68 vs 65 on dry.

Tire A · Falken FK452
Tire B · Kumho Crugen HP91

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

FK452 or Crugen HP91?

Which is better in the wet, FK452 or Crugen HP91?

Kumho Crugen HP91, 73 vs 67 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, FK452 or Crugen HP91?

Kumho Crugen HP91, 68 vs 65 on our dry score.

Which is more comfortable, FK452 or Crugen HP91?

Kumho Crugen HP91, 69 vs 63 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, FK452 or Crugen HP91?

Neither, by our numbers: 60 vs 62 on the treadwear score, within 3 points.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology