Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 2 road tests and 1,053 + 840 owner reviews. How we score
Crugen HP91 is ahead, 69–59
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 53 · 1,053 reviews
“A lot of our cars come with that Bridgestone. Often need replacement at only 30k km. They are also very sensitive to alignment, even slight off and the tires will wear unevenly and get noisy. Still better than the Dunlops though.”
Tests 68 · 2 tests Owners 71 · 840 reviews
Best test result: #3 of 8 in 2018 All Road 265/60 R18 4x4 Tyre Test (noise)
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
| Source | Alenza 001 | Crugen HP91 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 2 tests | ≈ 62 (est.) | 64 |
| Reviews found online | 55 | 75 |
Alenza 001: 60% × 62.5 (est.) + 40% × 54.7 = 59
Crugen HP91: 60% × 63.7 + 40% × 74.7 = 68
No road tests of dry for Alenza 001. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
| Source | Alenza 001 | Crugen HP91 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 2 tests | ≈ 65 (est.) | 70 |
| Reviews found online | 60 | 78 |
Alenza 001: 60% × 64.7 (est.) + 40% × 59.7 = 63
Crugen HP91: 60% × 69.8 + 40% × 77.7 = 73
No road tests of wet for Alenza 001. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
| Source | Alenza 001 | Crugen HP91 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | ≈ 64 (est.) | ≈ 69 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 46 | 69 |
Alenza 001: 40% × 64 (est.) + 60% × 45.7 = 53
Crugen HP91: 40% × 68.7 (est.) + 60% × 68.8 = 69
No road tests of comfort for Alenza 001. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
No road tests of comfort for Crugen HP91. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
| Source | Alenza 001 | Crugen HP91 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests | – | 73 |
| Reviews found online | – | ≈ 66 (est.) |
Crugen HP91: 60% × 73.1 + 40% × 66.3 (est.) = 70
No owner ratings of noise for Crugen HP91. The owner half is the owners’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.
| Source | Alenza 001 | Crugen HP91 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | ≈ 60 (est.) | ≈ 64 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 47 | 59 |
Alenza 001: 60% × 59.7 (est.) + 40% × 47.4 = 55
Crugen HP91: 60% × 63.9 (est.) + 40% × 59.2 = 62
No road tests of treadwear for Alenza 001. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
No road tests of treadwear for Crugen HP91. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
| Source | Alenza 001 | Crugen HP91 |
|---|---|---|
| Reviews found online | 55 | 72 |
| Source | Alenza 001 | Crugen HP91 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests | – | 67 |
| Category | Bridgestone Alenza 001 | Kumho Crugen HP91 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 59 | 69 |
| Dry | 59 | 68 |
| Wet | 63 | 73 |
| Comfort | 53 | 69 |
| Noise | – | 70 |
| Treadwear | 55 | 62 |
| Handling (owners) | 55 | 72 |
| Efficiency | – | 67 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Alenza 001
Crugen HP91
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Community opinions on the Bridgestone Alenza 001 are split, largely depending on whether they are the run-flat variants. Many drivers praise their dry and wet handling, corner stability, and initial ride quality, while others criticize them for a harsh ride, noise, buzzy feedback on rough asphalt, and relatively fast treadwear. As original equipment (OE) tires on performance SUVs and crossovers, they are generally seen as capable in warm weather but poorly suited for cold temperatures, snow, or long-term tread life.
“have the alenza 001 on my cx5 for the past 3.5 years/40.000km,been rotating every 5k km and keeping the tire pressure correct,the wear is excellent,can go another 30k kms easy and israel has tough weather. perfect straight line and corner stability,wet and dry traction is top notch as well.been driving in hell hot and pouring rain weather.drive the car fast.had all sorts of brands and tires from all season to semi slicks,from primacy to r888 in my previous cars so i know a good tire when i have one only down side is its a harsh tire after 3years but its normal with bridgestone.i strongly recommend as a sporty luxury tire.”
“^^^^The Alenza 001 RFT is a summer tire not meant for snow or cold temps, and is a run-flat tire. As you surmised, it is a truck/SUV sport tire. If the sizing is correct, it should work out fine in your LC. However, as previously stated, RFTs are not as quiet as regular tires. The tire installer probably replaced them with RFTs because that's what you had mounted previously. If that's the case, you have experience with RFTs. Lexus used RFTs on the LC up until 2023 and switched to regular Hi-Po tires in 2024. Lou”
“Soon will have to replace tires on my NX350h Hi all, Soon I will have to replace the 2022 NX tires. The car came with "Bridgestone Alenza 001" so far so good, the ride quality has been nice, the noise is OK, and the rim protection (tire being wider than rim) worked well (narrow entrances with curbs in parkings in the city we live). We've made 75.000Km with the OEM tires and we will still make the summer with them before replacing them. In the area were we live is very rare to see snow. The car has no place for spare tire so runflats will have to be. I know runflats don't get "lots of love", but safety is a must and we will mount runflats again. The guy at the dealer offered us the GOODYEAR EFFICIENT GRIP 2 SUV. But as far as I've seen, those are not runflat. If we would like to improve, what would you recommend and why? Thanks!”
Based on 23 community posts
We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.
| Attribute | A · Bridgestone Alenza 001 | B · Kumho Crugen HP91 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | SUV and 4x4 |
| Sizes available | 73 | 34 |
| Rim diameters | 16″ – 22″ | 16″ – 22″ |
| Tread depth | 10/32″ | 10/32″ |
| UTQG | 400 A A | 420 A A |
| Sidewall | Blackwall | Blackwall |
| Max pressure | 51 psi | 51 psi |
| Sizes in common | 27 | 27 |
Bridgestone Alenza 001
Kumho Crugen HP91
Winner: Kumho Crugen HP91 — better handling, comfort and wet. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Kumho Crugen HP91 scores 72 vs 55 on handling.
Kumho Crugen HP91 scores 69 vs 53 on comfort.
Kumho Crugen HP91 scores 73 vs 63 on wet.
Kumho Crugen HP91 scores 68 vs 59 on dry.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Kumho Crugen HP91, 73 vs 63 on our wet score.
Kumho Crugen HP91, 68 vs 59 on our dry score.
Kumho Crugen HP91, 69 vs 53 on our comfort score.
Kumho Crugen HP91, 62 vs 55 on our treadwear score.
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology
