Tests 80 · 9 tests Owners 79 · 1,373 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 12 in 2023 Best SUV Tyres Tested (wet braking)
“Loving my new Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV tires and Enkei Raijin wheels”
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 9 + 0 road tests and 1,373 + 1,047 owner reviews. How we score
Pilot Sport 4 SUV is ahead, 83–60
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 80 · 9 tests Owners 79 · 1,373 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 12 in 2023 Best SUV Tyres Tested (wet braking)
“Loving my new Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV tires and Enkei Raijin wheels”
Tests – · none yet Owners 55 · 1,047 reviews
“A lot of our cars come with that Bridgestone. Often need replacement at only 30k km. They are also very sensitive to alignment, even slight off and the tires will wear unevenly and get noisy. Still better than the Dunlops though.”
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
| Source | Pilot Sport 4 SUV | Alenza 001 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 9 / – tests | 86 | ≈ 63 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 86 | 57 |
Pilot Sport 4 SUV: 60% × 86.1 + 40% × 86 = 86
Alenza 001: 60% × 63.4 (est.) + 40% × 56.7 = 61
No road tests of dry for Alenza 001. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).
| Source | Pilot Sport 4 SUV | Alenza 001 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 9 / – tests | 93 | ≈ 65 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 86 | 61 |
Pilot Sport 4 SUV: 60% × 93.4 + 40% × 86.4 = 91
Alenza 001: 60% × 65.5 (est.) + 40% × 61 = 64
No road tests of wet for Alenza 001. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.54).
| Source | Pilot Sport 4 SUV | Alenza 001 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 2 / – tests | 54 | ≈ 65 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 71 | 47 |
Pilot Sport 4 SUV: 40% × 54.1 + 60% × 70.9 = 64
Alenza 001: 40% × 65.1 (est.) + 60% × 46.8 = 54
No road tests of comfort for Alenza 001. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
| Source | Pilot Sport 4 SUV | Alenza 001 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 9 / – tests | 53 | – |
| Reviews found online | ≈ 67 (est.) | – |
Pilot Sport 4 SUV: 60% × 52.5 + 40% × 66.5 (est.) = 58
No owner ratings of noise for Pilot Sport 4 SUV. The owner half is the owners’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.
| Source | Pilot Sport 4 SUV | Alenza 001 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests | 77 | ≈ 60 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 66 | 49 |
Pilot Sport 4 SUV: 60% × 77 + 40% × 65.5 = 72
Alenza 001: 60% × 60.4 (est.) + 40% × 49 = 56
No road tests of treadwear for Alenza 001. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).
| Source | Pilot Sport 4 SUV | Alenza 001 |
|---|---|---|
| Reviews found online | 83 | 58 |
| Source | Pilot Sport 4 SUV | Alenza 001 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 9 / – tests | 64 | – |
| Category | Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV | Bridgestone Alenza 001 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 83 | 60 |
| Dry | 86 | 61 |
| Wet | 91 | 64 |
| Comfort | 64 | 54 |
| Noise | 58 | – |
| Treadwear | 72 | 56 |
| Handling (owners) | 83 | 58 |
| Efficiency | 64 | – |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Pilot Sport 4 SUV
Alenza 001
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Community sentiment toward the Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV is generally very positive, with owners highlighting its strong grip, handling precision, and suitability for heavy performance SUVs. Users frequently compare it favorably to older Latitude Sport 3 and standard passenger tires, though they emphasize its summer-only limitation below 40°F and note trade-offs in price and tread life.
“Have a 2014 CTTS with 21" wheels. Just had Michelin PilotSport4 SUV All-season put on. Before that had Michelin PilotSport4S. Have about 1K miles on the new tires, and no experience with it in winter weather yet, but prefer the ride quality over the PS4S. The PS4SUV are a softer ride, yet still have plenty of grip when I hit the "Sport" button. IMO, the PS4S is overkill for the Cayenne. Obviously, subjective and YMMV. Does your wife engage in "spirited" driving? As background, I have PS4S tires on my 2016 Spyder and love them.”
“Figured I would update this thread. Ended up buying a set of four brand new 18" Saab 9-7X wheels that were shipped over, and went with Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV tires in 255/55R18 109Y XL flavor. This is the first set of French made Michelins I've purchased, and they all were manufactured in December 2021. Also got some chrome McGard spline drive lug nuts. The ride is definitely firmer than it was compared to the 255/60R17 106V tires on there previously, but that's a good thing in my book. Only put 18 miles on them so far, so I can't say all that much. However, I definitely like them so far.”
“The CrossClimate2 is supposed to be better in every way compared to the prior generations, including less rolling resistance (better fuel economy). Most Tire Rack reviews are from people who have only driven on tires for a short time so when there are tread life ratings from consumers I don't know how accurate it is. My Michelin Pilot Sport4SUV summer tires have 1500 miles on them and started at 9/32nds and are still 9/32nds (all 4 corners) with some very aggressive driving (testing rear sway bars) and only have 200 treadwear rating.”
Based on 37 community posts
Community opinions on the Bridgestone Alenza 001 are mixed, largely depending on whether the tire is a run-flat variant and how it is used. Many drivers appreciate its strong dry and wet grip, stable handling, and decent longevity when properly maintained, but critics frequently cite issues with road noise, a buzzy or harsh ride over rough pavement, and poor cold-weather or snow performance.
“Opinions on Michelin primacy tour A/S or keeping Bridgestone Alenza 001 Its time for me to replace the tires on my iX and I'm unsure about if dropping to the touring tire would ruin the handling of the iX and drop the range. Currently on a set of Alenza 001 and I have liked their feel, handling and over all use. But for some extra tread life, would going to the primacy tours be worth it? Worried that the car would feel worse with a loss of grip and that the higher tread would reduce the range. Since I do several road trips a year which require 2-4 charging stops, I'd rather not add an extra one from a loss of 20-30 miles of total range because of tires. Anyone have experience with the Michelin primacy tour A/S? This is on a 2023 iX with the 21" wheels.”
“Soon will have to replace tires on my NX350h Hi all, Soon I will have to replace the 2022 NX tires. The car came with "Bridgestone Alenza 001" so far so good, the ride quality has been nice, the noise is OK, and the rim protection (tire being wider than rim) worked well (narrow entrances with curbs in parkings in the city we live). We've made 75.000Km with the OEM tires and we will still make the summer with them before replacing them. In the area were we live is very rare to see snow. The car has no place for spare tire so runflats will have to be. I know runflats don't get "lots of love", but safety is a must and we will mount runflats again. The guy at the dealer offered us the GOODYEAR EFFICIENT GRIP 2 SUV. But as far as I've seen, those are not runflat. If we would like to improve, what would you recommend and why? Thanks!”
“^^^^The Alenza 001 RFT is a summer tire not meant for snow or cold temps, and is a run-flat tire. As you surmised, it is a truck/SUV sport tire. If the sizing is correct, it should work out fine in your LC. However, as previously stated, RFTs are not as quiet as regular tires. The tire installer probably replaced them with RFTs because that's what you had mounted previously. If that's the case, you have experience with RFTs. Lexus used RFTs on the LC up until 2023 and switched to regular Hi-Po tires in 2024. Lou”
Based on 23 community posts
| Attribute | A · Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV | B · Bridgestone Alenza 001 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | SUV and 4x4 | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 65 | 73 |
| Rim diameters | 17″ – 23″ | 16″ – 22″ |
| Tread depth | — | 10/32″ |
| UTQG | — | 400 A A |
| Sidewall | — | Blackwall |
| Max pressure | — | 51 psi |
| Sizes in common | 44 | 44 |
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV
Bridgestone Alenza 001
Winner: Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV — better wet, dry and handling. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV scores 91 vs 64 on wet.
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV scores 86 vs 61 on dry.
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV scores 83 vs 58 on handling.
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV scores 72 vs 56 on treadwear.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV, 91 vs 64 on our wet score.
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV, 86 vs 61 on our dry score.
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV, 64 vs 54 on our comfort score.
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV, 72 vs 56 on our treadwear score.
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology