Head-to-head Updated

Kumho Crugen HP71 vs Kumho Crugen HP91 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 2 road tests and 278 + 840 owner reviews. How we score

Crugen HP91 is ahead, 69–46

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Kumho Crugen HP71
Tire AKumho

Crugen HP71

Summer Ultra High Performance tires

± 8

Tests – · none yet Owners 34 · 278 reviews

“Tesla model y tire HP71 crugen on tirerack is offering $80 rebate per tire.”

Kumho Crugen HP91
Tire BKumho

Crugen HP91

Summer

± 8

Tests 68 · 2 tests Owners 71 · 840 reviews

Best test result: #3 of 8 in 2018 All Road 265/60 R18 4x4 Tyre Test (noise)

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 44

    Dry

    Crugen HP91 +24
    68
    Why this score
    SourceCrugen HP71Crugen HP91
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 2 tests≈ 53 (est.)64
    Reviews found online3175

    Crugen HP71: 60% × 52.5 (est.) + 40% × 30.6 = 44

    Crugen HP91: 60% × 63.7 + 40% × 74.7 = 68

    No road tests of dry for Crugen HP71. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).

  2. 51

    Wet

    Crugen HP91 +22
    73
    Why this score
    SourceCrugen HP71Crugen HP91
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 2 tests≈ 56 (est.)70
    Reviews found online4478

    Crugen HP71: 60% × 56 (est.) + 40% × 43.8 = 51

    Crugen HP91: 60% × 69.8 + 40% × 77.7 = 73

    No road tests of wet for Crugen HP71. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. 53

    Snow

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceCrugen HP71Crugen HP91
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 61 (est.)–
    Reviews found online41–

    Crugen HP71: 60% × 61.1 (est.) + 40% × 40.9 = 53

    No road tests of snow for Crugen HP71. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).

  4. 44

    Comfort

    Crugen HP91 +25
    69
    Why this score
    SourceCrugen HP71Crugen HP91
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 61 (est.)≈ 69 (est.)
    Reviews found online3269

    Crugen HP71: 40% × 61.3 (est.) + 60% × 32 = 44

    Crugen HP91: 40% × 68.7 (est.) + 60% × 68.8 = 69

    No road tests of comfort for Crugen HP71. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

    No road tests of comfort for Crugen HP91. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

  5. 54

    Noise

    Crugen HP91 +16
    70
    Why this score
    SourceCrugen HP71Crugen HP91
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests≈ 66 (est.)73
    Reviews found online36≈ 66 (est.)

    Crugen HP71: 60% × 66.3 (est.) + 40% × 35.5 = 54

    Crugen HP91: 60% × 73.1 + 40% × 66.3 (est.) = 70

    No road tests of noise for Crugen HP71. The test half is the tested tires’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

    No owner ratings of noise for Crugen HP91. The owner half is the owners’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.

  6. 37

    Treadwear

    Crugen HP91 +25
    62
    Why this score
    SourceCrugen HP71Crugen HP91
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 49 (est.)≈ 64 (est.)
    Reviews found online1959

    Crugen HP71: 60% × 49.4 (est.) + 40% × 18.5 = 37

    Crugen HP91: 60% × 63.9 (est.) + 40% × 59.2 = 62

    No road tests of treadwear for Crugen HP71. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

    No road tests of treadwear for Crugen HP91. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

  7. 51

    Handling (owners)

    Crugen HP91 +21
    72
    Why this score
    SourceCrugen HP71Crugen HP91
    Reviews found online5172
  8. –

    Efficiency

    No comparison
    67
    Why this score
    SourceCrugen HP71Crugen HP91
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests–67
Scores at a glance
Kumho Crugen HP71 vs Kumho Crugen HP91: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryKumho Crugen HP71Kumho Crugen HP91
Relative Score 46 69
Dry 44 68
Wet 51 73
Snow 53 –
Comfort 44 69
Noise 54 70
Treadwear 37 62
Handling (owners) 51 72
Efficiency – 67

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Recomputed
Headline score
± 8

Crugen HP71

± 8

Crugen HP91

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

The professional test results behind the scores

Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.

DisciplineCategoryCrugen HP71Crugen HP91ΔHead-to-head
Also published by the testers (not in the score)
Overall Ranking Overall #8/9 2021 Teknikens Värld Summer Tire Test R18 #5/8 2018 All Road 265/60 R18 4x4 Tyre Test – Different tests

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Crugen HP71

Pros

  • Strong value: frequently described as much cheaper than Michelin, Pirelli or Bridgestone alternatives while not feeling like a budget tire.
  • Good wet and heavy-rain traction, with some reports of confident light-snow performance.
  • Quiet, smooth ride reported by many owners, often as an improvement over the stock tires (Bridgestone Dueler, Pirelli, Hankook).

Cons

  • Premature or uneven tread wear is the most common complaint, with reports of tires worn out at roughly 15,000 to 27,000 miles or within 1.5 years, far below the 65,000-mile rating.
  • Road and highway noise, including howling that develops with mileage, reported by several owners.
  • Vibration and difficulty keeping the tires balanced, in some cases even after repeated balancing and rotations.
All owner themes in the Crugen HP71 review

Tire B Crugen HP91

Pros

  • Strong wet and dry traction providing high confidence
  • Competitive, budget-friendly pricing compared to tier-1 premium brands
  • Low road noise and enhanced ride comfort

Cons

  • Accelerated tread wear reported by some aggressive drivers or heavy vehicle owners
  • Occasional complaints regarding poor performance in deep snow or ice
  • Minor instances of increased road noise or vibration for a few users
All owner themes in the Crugen HP91 review

What real owners are saying

From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score

Tire A

Kumho Crugen HP71

Mixed

Community opinions on the Kumho Crugen HP71 (including EV variants) are generally mixed, primarily leaning on price and initial comfort versus longevity. Many users appreciate the affordable pricing, quiet/smooth ride, and good handling, but a significant number report faster-than-expected tread wear and occasional issues with foam lining separation or durability on heavier vehicles.

r/Cadillac ·2 upvotes ·2026-09-28

“I have The Kumho Crugen HP71 275/50 R22 111H on my 22 ESV Sport And don’t regret it at all. They are much better than original ones and also a lot cheaper in Walmart.”

r/KiaEV9 ·1 upvote ·2026-09-28

“New Tire Woes: Trouble finding XL Load rating. Any advice? 2026 EV9 LLR with 20k miles in SoCal (3 year lease) and the Kumho Crugen HP71 EV wore very quickly despite alignment checks etc early in the lease. Note that these stock tires are 130V with XL load rasting. Most disconcerting is that despite some modest tread left, I hydroplaned on some sprinkler runoff...so I'm not confident in these tires with the upcoming El Nino. This subreddit seems to love the Michelin CrossClimate2 but they don't come in XL load rating in this size. Neither do Defenders. The two main options are: 1. **Hankook iON evo AS SUV** (OE on some EV9s) - But these are seemingly backordered at multiple tire shops. An online vendor cancelled my order despite showing in stock on the site. 2. **Pirelli Scorpion Verde All Season**. **Any advice, and anyone have experience with those Pirellis?**”

r/nissanpathfinder ·1 upvote ·2026-05-31

“2026 Pathfinder Tires: 255/60R18 Kumho Crugen HP71 vs 255/50R20 Bridgestone Alenza AS Ultra I think I settled on a configuration that suits our needs but it comes with the upgraded 255/50R20 Bridgestone Alenza AS Ultra tires/rims. The 20" wheels look great but I think the 18" Kumho's with the taller side will be better for the sometimes rough roads (potholes, large bumps, torn up city streets) we drive and for lighter towing. I highly doubt the dealer will exchange them for me but first I wanted to ask if I'm just overthinking this or should I try to trade down for the 18s. For reference I'm completely satisfied driving an outback with 225/60R18 Yokohama Avid GT (controlled, planted) and not happy with a highlander with 235/65R18 (too soft, uncontrolled). I get that these are different vehicles, suspensions, center of gravity, but hopefully it gives you a better idea. Thanks Edit: clarification on towing: fiberglass trailer like Scamp/Casita”

Top themes
#Affordability and Value#Ride Comfort and Noise#Tread Wear and Longevity#EV Performance and Efficiency#Durability and Quality Issues

Based on 52 community posts

Tire B

Kumho Crugen HP91

We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Kumho Crugen HP71 B · Kumho Crugen HP91
CategorySummer Ultra High Performance tiresSummer
Vehicle typeSUV and 4x4SUV and 4x4
Sizes available6334
Rim diameters16″ – 22″16″ – 22″
Tread depth9.9/32″10/32″
UTQG640 A A420 A A
Treadwear warranty65,000 mi—
SidewallBlackwallBlackwall
Max pressure51 psi51 psi
Sizes in common2020

Which one should you actually buy?

Kumho Crugen HP71

Kumho Crugen HP91

Winner: Kumho Crugen HP91 — better comfort, treadwear and dry. It leads or ties in every category we score.

Pick tire B You want the most comfortable ride

Kumho Crugen HP91 scores 69 vs 44 on comfort.

Pick tire B You want the longest tread life

Kumho Crugen HP91 scores 62 vs 37 on treadwear.

Pick tire B You want the most grip on dry roads

Kumho Crugen HP91 scores 68 vs 44 on dry.

Pick tire B Your priority is wet-weather safety

Kumho Crugen HP91 scores 73 vs 51 on wet.

Tire A · Kumho Crugen HP71
Tire B · Kumho Crugen HP91

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Crugen HP71 or Crugen HP91?

Which is better in the wet, Crugen HP71 or Crugen HP91?

Kumho Crugen HP91, 73 vs 51 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, Crugen HP71 or Crugen HP91?

Kumho Crugen HP91, 68 vs 44 on our dry score.

Which is quieter, Crugen HP71 or Crugen HP91?

Kumho Crugen HP91, 70 vs 54 on our noise score.

Which is more comfortable, Crugen HP71 or Crugen HP91?

Kumho Crugen HP91, 69 vs 44 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, Crugen HP71 or Crugen HP91?

Kumho Crugen HP91, 62 vs 37 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology