Tests – · none yet Owners 63 · 211 reviews
“for the price, theyre pretty decent. theyre not the stickiest tires available, but theyre alright and imo, theyre pretty predictable when nearing their limits.”
Head-to-head
Updated
Falken FK452 vs Vredestein Quatrac Pro — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 0 + 14 road tests and 211 + 588 owner reviews. How we score
Quatrac Pro is ahead, 75–65
Add your size for an exact match
/R
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 68 · 14 tests Owners 74 · 588 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 16 in 2021 Auto Bild All Season Tyre Test (wet braking)
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
66
Dry
Quatrac Pro +874Why this score
Source FK452 Quatrac Pro Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 13 tests ≈ 66 (est.) 73 Reviews found online 65 75 FK452: 60% × 66.5 (est.) + 40% × 64.6 = 66
Quatrac Pro: 60% × 72.6 + 40% × 75.1 = 74
No road tests of dry for FK452. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).
-
67
Wet
Quatrac Pro +1683Why this score
Source FK452 Quatrac Pro Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 13 tests ≈ 68 (est.) 84 Reviews found online 66 80 FK452: 60% × 67.6 (est.) + 40% × 65.9 = 67
Quatrac Pro: 60% × 84.2 + 40% × 80 = 83
No road tests of wet for FK452. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).
-
–
Snow
No comparison55Why this score
Source FK452 Quatrac Pro Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 11 tests – 48 Reviews found online – 66 Quatrac Pro: 60% × 48.4 + 40% × 65.8 = 55
-
66
Comfort
Quatrac Pro +975Why this score
Source FK452 Quatrac Pro Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests ≈ 68 (est.) 73 Reviews found online 62 77 FK452: 60% × 67.9 (est.) + 40% × 62.1 = 66
Quatrac Pro: 60% × 72.9 + 40% × 77.2 = 75
No road tests of comfort for FK452. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
–
Noise
No comparison75Why this score
Source FK452 Quatrac Pro Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 10 tests – 75 Reviews found online – 74 Quatrac Pro: 60% × 75.4 + 40% × 73.6 = 75
-
61
Treadwear
Level61Why this score
Source FK452 Quatrac Pro Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 2 tests ≈ 63 (est.) 55 Reviews found online 58 69 FK452: 60% × 63.3 (est.) + 40% × 58.2 = 61
Quatrac Pro: 60% × 54.9 + 40% × 69.2 = 61
No road tests of treadwear for FK452. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).
-
64
Handling (owners)
Quatrac Pro +1074Why this score
Source FK452 Quatrac Pro Reviews found online 64 74
Scores at a glance
| Category | Falken FK452 | Vredestein Quatrac Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 65 | 75 |
| Dry | 66 | 74 |
| Wet | 67 | 83 |
| Snow | – | 55 |
| Comfort | 66 | 75 |
| Noise | – | 75 |
| Treadwear | 61 | 61 |
| Handling (owners) | 64 | 74 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
65
/ 100
FK452
75
/ 100
Quatrac Pro
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A FK452
Pros
- Exceptional value for money compared to premium competitors
- Strong dry and wet traction for spirited driving
- Predictable and progressive breakaway characteristics
Cons
- High levels of road noise, often described as a 'hum' or 'bearing-like' sound
- Rapid and sometimes uneven tread wear
- Soft sidewalls leading to vague steering feel or 'gelatinous' handling
Tire B Quatrac Pro
Pros
- Exceptional wet weather performance with high resistance to aquaplaning
- Remarkably low road noise and high ride comfort compared to OEM or run-flat tires
- Strong and predictable grip in cold, rainy, and mild winter conditions
Cons
- Reduced fuel economy or slight negative impact on range reported by some users
- Mixed feedback on durability, with a few drivers experiencing faster-than-expected tread wear or manufacturing defects
- Subpar performance in heavy snow or packed ice compared to dedicated winter tires
What real owners are saying
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Tire A
Positive
Falken FK452
Community opinion on the Falken FK452 is generally favorable, with many drivers praising its balance of solid wet and dry grip, low road noise, and accessible pricing. While regarded as a dependable daily performance tire that also stretches well, notable drawbacks cited by owners include fast tread wear on sports cars, tendency to flat-spot when sitting, and degradation in grip and road noise as the tread gets low.
g42.bimmerpost.com
“for the price, theyre pretty decent. theyre not the stickiest tires available, but theyre alright and imo, theyre pretty predictable when nearing their limits.”
rx8club.com
“Dude, I had pretty much the same choice as you... same rims, same vendors, same car Many reviews mentioned that T1Rs have softer sidewall than FK452, thus preferring the steering feel of Falken when you push it in the curves. As for daily driver it probably doesn't make a difference. Also, are you planning to have a different set for the winter? If not, you'll need all seasons. 1010tires . com have plenty of real-world user reviews on those tires. Also, search Google, there were some interesting reviews on BMW & Audi forums.”
avforums.com
·2012-03-02
“I also have Falken FK452 on my MKII Focus Diesel, in 225/40/18. They're really quite excellent tyres in both wet and dry to be quite honest. Seeing as the Focus isn't really that "sporting", I was quite happy to get 29'000 miles out of the set I last had at the front, which was a lot more than the 14'000 or so I got out of the Goodyear Eagle F1 (but the F1 was sticky as anything!). Only issue: they're not as cheap as they once were. People are getting wise to their performance for the rather sensible price, and I've seen them creep up around £25 a corner for me in the last two years.”
Top themes
#wet and dry grip#value and price#treadwear and longevity#tire stretch fitment#road noise and NVH#sidewall stiffness
Based on 47 community posts
Tire B
Vredestein Quatrac Pro
We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Falken FK452 | B · Vredestein Quatrac Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | All Season |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | — | 97 |
| Rim diameters | — | 17″ – 22″ |
Which one should you actually buy?
65
/ 100
Falken FK452
75
/ 100
Vredestein Quatrac Pro
Winner: Vredestein Quatrac Pro — better wet, handling and comfort. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Pick tire B
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Vredestein Quatrac Pro scores 83 vs 67 on wet.
Pick tire B
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Vredestein Quatrac Pro scores 74 vs 64 on handling.
Pick tire B
You want the most comfortable ride
Vredestein Quatrac Pro scores 75 vs 66 on comfort.
Pick tire B
You want the most grip on dry roads
Vredestein Quatrac Pro scores 74 vs 66 on dry.
Tire A · Falken FK452
Tire B · Vredestein Quatrac Pro
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
FK452 or Quatrac Pro?
Which is better in the wet, FK452 or Quatrac Pro?
Vredestein Quatrac Pro, 83 vs 67 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, FK452 or Quatrac Pro?
Vredestein Quatrac Pro, 74 vs 66 on our dry score.
Which is more comfortable, FK452 or Quatrac Pro?
Vredestein Quatrac Pro, 75 vs 66 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, FK452 or Quatrac Pro?
Neither, by our numbers: 61 vs 61 on the treadwear score, within 3 points.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology