Head-to-head Updated

Falken FK452 vs Yokohama S.drive — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): 60% professional tests, 40% owner reviews.

Too close to call: FK452 and S.drive are level at 65.

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Tire AFalken

FK452

Summer

Tests – · none yet Owners 63 · 211 reviews

Tire BYokohama

S.drive

Ultra High Performance Summer tire

Tests – · 1 test Owners 59 · 76 reviews

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 66

    Dry

    Level
    66
    Why this score
    SourceFK452S.drive
    Reviews found online6465
  2. 67

    Wet

    FK452 +4
    63
    Why this score
    SourceFK452S.drive
    Reviews found online6660
  3. –

    Snow

    No comparison
    50
    Why this score
    SourceFK452S.drive
    Reviews found online–38
  4. 66

    Comfort

    FK452 +3
    63
    Why this score
    SourceFK452S.drive
    Reviews found online6257
  5. –

    Noise

    No comparison
    64
    Why this score
    SourceFK452S.drive
    Reviews found online–61
  6. 61

    Treadwear

    S.drive +5
    66
    Why this score
    SourceFK452S.drive
    Professional tests (TWG score)–70
    Reviews found online5860
  7. 64

    Handling

    Level
    64
    Why this score
    SourceFK452S.drive
    Reviews found online6464
Scores at a glance
Falken FK452 vs Yokohama S.drive: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryFalken FK452Yokohama S.drive
Relative Score 65 65
Dry 66 66
Wet 67 63
Snow – 50
Comfort 66 63
Noise – 64
Treadwear 61 66
Handling 64 64

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost

Neither tire has a score here yet, so this weight changes nothing.

Less important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Less important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost

Neither tire has a score here yet, so this weight changes nothing.

Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score

FK452

S.drive

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A FK452

Pros

  • Exceptional value for money compared to premium competitors
  • Strong dry and wet traction for spirited driving
  • Predictable and progressive breakaway characteristics

Cons

  • High levels of road noise, often described as a 'hum' or 'bearing-like' sound
  • Rapid and sometimes uneven tread wear
  • Soft sidewalls leading to vague steering feel or 'gelatinous' handling
All owner themes in the FK452 review

Tire B S.drive

Pros

  • Excellent dry grip and responsive handling
  • Progressive and predictable breakaway behavior in corners
  • Good overall tread longevity for a performance tire

Cons

  • Below-average or unsettling wet-weather traction
  • Noticeable road noise and tire roar on highways
  • Stiff, hard ride quality that can reduce comfort on rough roads
All owner themes in the S.drive review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Falken FK452 B · Yokohama S.drive
CategorySummerUltra High Performance Summer tire
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Tread depth—10/32″
UTQG—300 A A
Sidewall—Blackwall
Max pressure—51 psi

Which one should you actually buy?

Falken FK452

Yokohama S.drive

Too close to call: Falken FK452 and Yokohama S.drive are within 2 points overall. Falken FK452 is stronger on wet and comfort. Yokohama S.drive is stronger on treadwear.

Pick tire B You want the longest tread life

Yokohama S.drive scores 66 vs 61 on treadwear.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

Falken FK452 scores 67 vs 63 on wet.

Pick tire A You want the most comfortable ride

Falken FK452 scores 66 vs 63 on comfort.

Tire A · Falken FK452
Tire B · Yokohama S.drive

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.

65

Too close to call

FK452

Amazon