tirewheelguide
Head-to-head Updated

Falken FK453CC vs Firestone Destination M/T2 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 3 + 39 owner reviews. How we score

Destination M/T2 is ahead, 67–59

Check price on Amazon · Destination M/T2 or FK453CC on Amazon
Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Falken FK453CC
Tire AFalken

FK453CC

Summer Ultra High Performance tires

Provisional

Tests – · none yet Owners 54 · 3 reviews

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 59

    Dry

    Destination M/T2 +10
    69
    Why this score
    SourceFK453CCDestination M/T2
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 62 (est.)≈ 69 (est.)
    Reviews found online5470

    FK453CC: 60% × 62.4 (est.) + 40% × 54.4 = 59

    Destination M/T2: 60% × 68.6 (est.) + 40% × 70 = 69

    No road tests of dry for FK453CC. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

    No road tests of dry for Destination M/T2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

  2. 61

    Wet

    Destination M/T2 +10
    71
    Why this score
    SourceFK453CCDestination M/T2
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 63 (est.)≈ 71 (est.)
    Reviews found online5872

    FK453CC: 60% × 63.1 (est.) + 40% × 57.8 = 61

    Destination M/T2: 60% × 71 (est.) + 40% × 72 = 71

    No road tests of wet for FK453CC. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

    No road tests of wet for Destination M/T2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

  3. –

    Snow

    No comparison
    70
    Why this score
    SourceFK453CCDestination M/T2
    Professional tests (TWG score)–≈ 70 (est.)
    Reviews found online–71

    Destination M/T2: 60% × 70.2 (est.) + 40% × 70.7 = 70

    No road tests of snow for Destination M/T2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).

  4. 58

    Comfort

    Destination M/T2 +8
    66
    Why this score
    SourceFK453CCDestination M/T2
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 65 (est.)≈ 68 (est.)
    Reviews found online4863

    FK453CC: 60% × 65.4 (est.) + 40% × 47.8 = 58

    Destination M/T2: 60% × 68.1 (est.) + 40% × 63.3 = 66

    No road tests of comfort for FK453CC or Destination M/T2. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. –

    Noise

    No comparison
    61
    Why this score
    SourceFK453CCDestination M/T2
    Professional tests (TWG score)–≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online–52

    Destination M/T2: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 52.3 = 61

    No road tests of noise for Destination M/T2. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 57

    Treadwear

    Destination M/T2 +3
    60
    Why this score
    SourceFK453CCDestination M/T2
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 61 (est.)≈ 63 (est.)
    Reviews found online5156

    FK453CC: 60% × 61.2 (est.) + 40% × 51.3 = 57

    Destination M/T2: 60% × 62.7 (est.) + 40% × 56.1 = 60

    No road tests of treadwear for FK453CC. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

    No road tests of treadwear for Destination M/T2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

  7. 53

    Handling (owners)

    Destination M/T2 +13
    66
    Why this score
    SourceFK453CCDestination M/T2
    Reviews found online5366
Scores at a glance
CategoryFalken FK453CCFirestone Destination M/T2
Relative Score 59 67
Dry 59 69
Wet 61 71
Snow – 70
Comfort 58 66
Noise – 61
Treadwear 57 60
Handling (owners) 53 66

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score

FK453CC

Destination M/T2

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A FK453CC

Pros

  • Improved dry handling performance compared to factory-fitted tires
  • Strong value proposition for the price point
  • Capable performance during long-distance motorway driving

Cons

  • Harsh ride quality on uneven or potholed urban roads
  • Negative impact on fuel economy
  • Rapid tread wear reported by some users
All owner themes in the FK453CC review

Tire B Destination M/T2

Pros

  • Unexpectedly low road noise for a mud-terrain tire
  • Exceptional off-road traction in mud, sand, and deep snow
  • Good highway manners and stable handling

Cons

  • Can develop cupping and increased noise if maintenance/rotations are neglected
  • Slight initial slip on road paint during the first few thousand miles
  • Mixed reports on longevity when heavily utilized for towing or rough gravel service
All owner themes in the Destination M/T2 review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Falken FK453CC B · Firestone Destination M/T2
CategorySummer Ultra High Performance tiresMud-Terrain tire
Vehicle typeSUV and 4x4SUV and 4x4
Sizes available118
Rim diameters18″15″ – 20″
Tread depth—19/32″
Sidewall—Outlined White Lettering
Max pressure—50 psi

Which one should you actually buy?

Falken FK453CC

Firestone Destination M/T2

Winner: Firestone Destination M/T2 — better handling, dry and wet. It leads or ties in every category we score. Falken FK453CC rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 3 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire B You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Firestone Destination M/T2 scores 66 vs 53 on handling.

Pick tire B You want the most grip on dry roads

Firestone Destination M/T2 scores 69 vs 59 on dry.

Pick tire B Your priority is wet-weather safety

Firestone Destination M/T2 scores 71 vs 61 on wet.

Pick tire B You want the most comfortable ride

Firestone Destination M/T2 scores 66 vs 58 on comfort.

Tire A · Falken FK453CC
Check price on Amazon
Tire B · Firestone Destination M/T2
Check price on Amazon

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

FK453CC or Destination M/T2?

Which is better in the wet, FK453CC or Destination M/T2?

Firestone Destination M/T2, 71 vs 61 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, FK453CC or Destination M/T2?

Firestone Destination M/T2, 69 vs 59 on our dry score.

Which is more comfortable, FK453CC or Destination M/T2?

Firestone Destination M/T2, 66 vs 58 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, FK453CC or Destination M/T2?

Firestone Destination M/T2, 60 vs 57 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology