Tests – · none yet Owners 33 · 128 reviews
Falken Linam VAN01 vs Nexen N Fera SU4 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): 60% professional tests, 40% owner reviews.
N Fera SU4 is ahead, 74–43
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 77 · 80 reviews
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
45
Dry
N Fera SU4 +3176Why this score
Source Linam VAN01 N Fera SU4 Reviews found online 32 80 -
43
Wet
N Fera SU4 +3578Why this score
Source Linam VAN01 N Fera SU4 Reviews found online 34 80 -
54
Comfort
N Fera SU4 +1973Why this score
Source Linam VAN01 N Fera SU4 Reviews found online 39 77 -
44
Treadwear
N Fera SU4 +2468Why this score
Source Linam VAN01 N Fera SU4 Reviews found online 29 70 -
34
Handling
N Fera SU4 +4276Why this score
Source Linam VAN01 N Fera SU4 Reviews found online 34 76
Scores at a glance
| Category | Falken Linam VAN01 | Nexen N Fera SU4 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 43 | 74 |
| Dry | 45 | 76 |
| Wet | 43 | 78 |
| Comfort | 54 | 73 |
| Treadwear | 44 | 68 |
| Handling | 34 | 76 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Linam VAN01
N Fera SU4
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Linam VAN01
Pros
- Good wet and dry traction compared to worn tires
- Low road noise and smooth ride comfort
- Stiff sidewalls and durable tread life for many users
Cons
- Some users report severe wheel spin and poor traction in damp or wet conditions
- Inconsistent tread life, with extreme outliers reporting premature wear down to 3mm quickly
- Lack of braking confidence reported by a minority of drivers in the wet
Tire B N Fera SU4
Pros
- Outstanding value for money compared to major premium brands
- High level of ride comfort and low road noise
- Reliable and predictable grip in both dry and wet conditions
Cons
- Softer sidewalls can lead to less precise steering feedback and body roll during aggressive cornering
- Average or faster-than-expected treadwear for some driving styles
- Can become harder and noisier as the tire ages or wears down
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Falken Linam VAN01 | B · Nexen N Fera SU4 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer Touring tires | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Van | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 26 | — |
| Rim diameters | 14″ – 17″ | — |
Which one should you actually buy?
Falken Linam VAN01
Nexen N Fera SU4
Winner: Nexen N Fera SU4 — better handling, wet and dry. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Nexen N Fera SU4 scores 76 vs 34 on handling.
Nexen N Fera SU4 scores 78 vs 43 on wet.
Nexen N Fera SU4 scores 76 vs 45 on dry.
Nexen N Fera SU4 scores 68 vs 44 on treadwear.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.