Tests – · none yet Owners 45 · 9 reviews
Falken SN828 looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.
Head-to-head
Updated
Falken SN828 vs Michelin Defender T+H — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 1 road tests and 9 + 1 owner reviews. How we score
Defender T+H is ahead, 71–53
Add your size for an exact match
/R
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · 1 test Owners 69 · 1 review
Best test result: #1 of 8 in 2022 Consumer Reports All-Season Tires (tested tread life (miles))
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
57
Dry
Defender T+H +1370Why this score
Source SN828 Defender T+H Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 61 (est.) ≈ 69 (est.) Reviews found online 52 71 SN828: 60% × 61.1 (est.) + 40% × 51.5 = 57
Defender T+H: 60% × 69.3 (est.) + 40% × 70.9 = 70
No road tests of dry for SN828. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).
No road tests of dry for Defender T+H. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).
-
52
Wet
Defender T+H +2173Why this score
Source SN828 Defender T+H Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 57 (est.) ≈ 72 (est.) Reviews found online 46 73 SN828: 60% × 56.8 (est.) + 40% × 45.5 = 52
Defender T+H: 60% × 72.2 (est.) + 40% × 73.4 = 73
No road tests of wet for SN828. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
No road tests of wet for Defender T+H. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
–
Snow
No comparison65Why this score
Source SN828 Defender T+H Professional tests (TWG score) – ≈ 68 (est.) Reviews found online – 62 Defender T+H: 60% × 67.5 (est.) + 40% × 62.1 = 65
No road tests of snow for Defender T+H. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).
-
57
Comfort
Defender T+H +1168Why this score
Source SN828 Defender T+H Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 66 (est.) ≈ 69 (est.) Reviews found online 51 67 SN828: 40% × 65.8 (est.) + 60% × 51 = 57
Defender T+H: 40% × 68.7 (est.) + 60% × 67 = 68
No road tests of comfort for SN828 or Defender T+H. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
48
Treadwear
Defender T+H +2573Why this score
Source SN828 Defender T+H Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests ≈ 56 (est.) 76 Reviews found online 37 68 SN828: 60% × 56 (est.) + 40% × 37.1 = 48
Defender T+H: 60% × 76.1 + 40% × 68 = 73
No road tests of treadwear for SN828. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).
-
38
Handling (owners)
No comparison–Why this score
Source SN828 Defender T+H Reviews found online 38 –
Scores at a glance
| Category | Falken SN828 | Michelin Defender T+H |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 53 | 71 |
| Dry | 57 | 70 |
| Wet | 52 | 73 |
| Snow | – | 65 |
| Comfort | 57 | 68 |
| Treadwear | 48 | 73 |
| Handling (owners) | 38 | – |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Recomputed
Headline score
53
/ 100
SN828
71
/ 100
Defender T+H
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A SN828
Pros
- High value for money compared to premium competitors
- Strong dry weather traction
- Comfortable ride quality
Cons
- Poor wet weather grip, including issues with wheel spin and braking
- Inconsistent noise levels, with some users reporting excessive cabin drone
- Subpar tread life and durability
Tire B Defender T+H
Not enough owner reviews yet to extract themes.
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Falken SN828 | B · Michelin Defender T+H |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Premium Touring All Season tire |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | SUV and 4x4 |
Which one should you actually buy?
53
/ 100
Falken SN828
71
/ 100
Michelin Defender T+H
Winner: Michelin Defender T+H — better treadwear, wet and dry. It leads or ties in every category we score. Falken SN828 rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 9 reviews), so read this result as provisional. Michelin Defender T+H rests on little evidence so far (1 test, 1 review), so read this result as provisional.
Pick tire B
You want the longest tread life
Michelin Defender T+H scores 73 vs 48 on treadwear.
Pick tire B
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Michelin Defender T+H scores 73 vs 52 on wet.
Pick tire B
You want the most grip on dry roads
Michelin Defender T+H scores 70 vs 57 on dry.
Pick tire B
You want the most comfortable ride
Michelin Defender T+H scores 68 vs 57 on comfort.
Tire A · Falken SN828
Tire B · Michelin Defender T+H
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
SN828 or Defender T+H?
Which is better in the wet, SN828 or Defender T+H?
Michelin Defender T+H, 73 vs 52 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, SN828 or Defender T+H?
Michelin Defender T+H, 70 vs 57 on our dry score.
Which is more comfortable, SN828 or Defender T+H?
Michelin Defender T+H, 68 vs 57 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, SN828 or Defender T+H?
Michelin Defender T+H, 73 vs 48 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology