Tests – · none yet Owners 44 · 9 reviews
Falken SN828 looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.
Falken SN828 vs Vredestein Sportrac 5 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 2 road tests and 9 + 336 owner reviews. How we score
Sportrac 5 is ahead, 75–52
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 72 · 2 tests Owners 78 · 336 reviews
Best test result: #2 of 20 in 2018 Auto Bild 15 inch Summer Tyre Test (noise)
“Ah yes, it is Dutch, and also produced in the Netherlands(east side of the country).. I am going this afternoon for the new ones, the sportrac 5 is well known here, I will keep you posted..”
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
57
Dry
Sportrac 5 +1774Why this score
Source SN828 Sportrac 5 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 2 tests ≈ 61 (est.) 71 Reviews found online 51 77 SN828: 60% × 61 (est.) + 40% × 51.1 = 57
Sportrac 5: 60% × 71.2 + 40% × 77 = 74
No road tests of dry for SN828. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).
-
52
Wet
Sportrac 5 +2476Why this score
Source SN828 Sportrac 5 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 2 tests ≈ 57 (est.) 73 Reviews found online 45 80 SN828: 60% × 56.7 (est.) + 40% × 45.2 = 52
Sportrac 5: 60% × 72.9 + 40% × 79.6 = 76
No road tests of wet for SN828. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
56
Comfort
Sportrac 5 +1672Why this score
Source SN828 Sportrac 5 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 65 (est.) ≈ 70 (est.) Reviews found online 50 74 SN828: 40% × 65 (est.) + 60% × 50.4 = 56
Sportrac 5: 40% × 69.8 (est.) + 60% × 74 = 72
No road tests of comfort for SN828. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
No road tests of comfort for Sportrac 5. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
-
–
Noise
No comparison71Why this score
Source SN828 Sportrac 5 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests – 75 Reviews found online – ≈ 66 (est.) Sportrac 5: 60% × 74.6 + 40% × 66.3 (est.) = 71
No owner ratings of noise for Sportrac 5. The owner half is the owners’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.
-
49
Treadwear
Sportrac 5 +2574Why this score
Source SN828 Sportrac 5 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests ≈ 56 (est.) 71 Reviews found online 37 78 SN828: 60% × 56 (est.) + 40% × 37.2 = 49
Sportrac 5: 60% × 71.2 + 40% × 77.6 = 74
No road tests of treadwear for SN828. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
-
37
Handling (owners)
Sportrac 5 +4077Why this score
Source SN828 Sportrac 5 Reviews found online 37 77 -
–
Efficiency
No comparison73Why this score
Source SN828 Sportrac 5 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests – 73
Scores at a glance
| Category | Falken SN828 | Vredestein Sportrac 5 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 52 | 75 |
| Dry | 57 | 74 |
| Wet | 52 | 76 |
| Comfort | 56 | 72 |
| Noise | – | 71 |
| Treadwear | 49 | 74 |
| Handling (owners) | 37 | 77 |
| Efficiency | – | 73 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
SN828
Sportrac 5
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A SN828
Pros
- High value for money compared to premium competitors
- Strong dry weather traction
- Comfortable ride quality
Cons
- Poor wet weather grip, including issues with wheel spin and braking
- Inconsistent noise levels, with some users reporting excessive cabin drone
- Subpar tread life and durability
Tire B Sportrac 5
Pros
- Excellent dry and wet grip for daily driving
- Quiet and comfortable ride quality
- Strong wear resistance and long tread life
Cons
- Soft sidewalls can feel vague or cause a 'floating' sensation on true sports cars
- Reduced stability and increased risk of hydroplaning in heavy standing water or deep puddles
- Some users reported a harsher ride due to stiffer compounds depending on the tire size
What real owners are saying
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Falken SN828
We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.
Vredestein Sportrac 5
Community sentiment toward the Vredestein Sportrac 5 is overwhelmingly positive, particularly among drivers of classic and older European or enthusiast cars. Users praise its strong wet and dry grip, sidewall stability, and compliant ride, frequently recommending it as one of the few high-quality summer performance tires still offered in rare 14-inch and 15-inch sizes.
“Originally Posted by artbuc Anyone have direct experience with Vredestein? Thanks. Just bought a set of Vredestein Sportrac 5's in 195/65/14's for the BMW below. They are very new (still have the nubs on the side walls) and are surprisingly VERY stable, yet compliant with potholes etc. Despite having taller side walls, they don't readily roll over when going for "spirited" drives around corners. Overall, they are one of only a few who make that size. Considering they are a summer tire, I find them very good overall. Not sure how they'll do over the years, but considering I drive that car about 200miles per year I'll probably have them for a while”
“Ending up getting Vredestein SPORTRAC 5s. Got a great price. After chatting with tyre guys I think it was a decent choice in the end.”
“Sportrac 5 didnt realise they did them in that size ive got them on the 206 designed by giugiaro grip like the preverbial to a blanket :thumbs:”
Based on 26 community posts
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Falken SN828 | B · Vredestein Sportrac 5 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | — | 35 |
| Rim diameters | — | 14″ – 17″ |
| UTQG | 460 - 500 A B | — |
Which one should you actually buy?
Falken SN828
Vredestein Sportrac 5
Winner: Vredestein Sportrac 5 — better handling, treadwear and wet. It leads or ties in every category we score. Falken SN828 rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 9 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Vredestein Sportrac 5 scores 77 vs 37 on handling.
Vredestein Sportrac 5 scores 74 vs 49 on treadwear.
Vredestein Sportrac 5 scores 76 vs 52 on wet.
Vredestein Sportrac 5 scores 74 vs 57 on dry.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
SN828 or Sportrac 5?
Which is better in the wet, SN828 or Sportrac 5?
Vredestein Sportrac 5, 76 vs 52 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, SN828 or Sportrac 5?
Vredestein Sportrac 5, 74 vs 57 on our dry score.
Which is more comfortable, SN828 or Sportrac 5?
Vredestein Sportrac 5, 72 vs 56 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, SN828 or Sportrac 5?
Vredestein Sportrac 5, 74 vs 49 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology