Tests – · 1 test Owners 69 · 1 review
Best test result: #1 of 8 in 2022 Consumer Reports All-Season Tires (tested tread life (miles))
Falken SN828 looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.
Head-to-head
Updated
Michelin Defender T+H vs Falken SN828 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 1 + 0 road tests and 1 + 9 owner reviews. How we score
Defender T+H is ahead, 71–53
Add your size for an exact match
/R
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
70
Dry
Defender T+H +1357Why this score
Source Defender T+H SN828 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 69 (est.) ≈ 61 (est.) Reviews found online 71 52 Defender T+H: 60% × 69.3 (est.) + 40% × 70.9 = 70
SN828: 60% × 61.1 (est.) + 40% × 51.5 = 57
No road tests of dry for Defender T+H. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).
No road tests of dry for SN828. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).
-
73
Wet
Defender T+H +2152Why this score
Source Defender T+H SN828 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 72 (est.) ≈ 57 (est.) Reviews found online 73 46 Defender T+H: 60% × 72.2 (est.) + 40% × 73.4 = 73
SN828: 60% × 56.8 (est.) + 40% × 45.5 = 52
No road tests of wet for Defender T+H. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
No road tests of wet for SN828. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
65
Snow
No comparison–Why this score
Source Defender T+H SN828 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 68 (est.) – Reviews found online 62 – Defender T+H: 60% × 67.5 (est.) + 40% × 62.1 = 65
No road tests of snow for Defender T+H. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).
-
68
Comfort
Defender T+H +1157Why this score
Source Defender T+H SN828 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 69 (est.) ≈ 66 (est.) Reviews found online 67 51 Defender T+H: 40% × 68.7 (est.) + 60% × 67 = 68
SN828: 40% × 65.8 (est.) + 60% × 51 = 57
No road tests of comfort for Defender T+H or SN828. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
73
Treadwear
Defender T+H +2548Why this score
Source Defender T+H SN828 Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests 76 ≈ 56 (est.) Reviews found online 68 37 Defender T+H: 60% × 76.1 + 40% × 68 = 73
SN828: 60% × 56 (est.) + 40% × 37.1 = 48
No road tests of treadwear for SN828. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).
-
–
Handling (owners)
No comparison38Why this score
Source Defender T+H SN828 Reviews found online – 38
Scores at a glance
| Category | Michelin Defender T+H | Falken SN828 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 71 | 53 |
| Dry | 70 | 57 |
| Wet | 73 | 52 |
| Snow | 65 | – |
| Comfort | 68 | 57 |
| Treadwear | 73 | 48 |
| Handling (owners) | – | 38 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Recomputed
Headline score
71
/ 100
Defender T+H
53
/ 100
SN828
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Defender T+H
Not enough owner reviews yet to extract themes.
Tire B SN828
Pros
- High value for money compared to premium competitors
- Strong dry weather traction
- Comfortable ride quality
Cons
- Poor wet weather grip, including issues with wheel spin and braking
- Inconsistent noise levels, with some users reporting excessive cabin drone
- Subpar tread life and durability
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Michelin Defender T+H | B · Falken SN828 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Premium Touring All Season tire | Summer |
| Vehicle type | SUV and 4x4 | Passenger Car / Crossover |
Which one should you actually buy?
71
/ 100
Michelin Defender T+H
53
/ 100
Falken SN828
Winner: Michelin Defender T+H — better treadwear, wet and dry. It leads or ties in every category we score. Michelin Defender T+H rests on little evidence so far (1 test, 1 review), so read this result as provisional. Falken SN828 rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 9 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Pick tire A
You want the longest tread life
Michelin Defender T+H scores 73 vs 48 on treadwear.
Pick tire A
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Michelin Defender T+H scores 73 vs 52 on wet.
Pick tire A
You want the most grip on dry roads
Michelin Defender T+H scores 70 vs 57 on dry.
Pick tire A
You want the most comfortable ride
Michelin Defender T+H scores 68 vs 57 on comfort.
Tire A · Michelin Defender T+H
Tire B · Falken SN828
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Defender T+H or SN828?
Which is better in the wet, Defender T+H or SN828?
Michelin Defender T+H, 73 vs 52 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, Defender T+H or SN828?
Michelin Defender T+H, 70 vs 57 on our dry score.
Which is more comfortable, Defender T+H or SN828?
Michelin Defender T+H, 68 vs 57 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, Defender T+H or SN828?
Michelin Defender T+H, 73 vs 48 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology