Tests – · none yet Owners 58 · 10 reviews
Falken Wildpeak WP A/T01 vs General Grabber A/TX — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 10 + 373 owner reviews. How we score
Grabber A/TX is ahead, 68–61
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 68 · 373 reviews
“275/60r20 General Grabber A/Tx Just thought I'd share what my truck looks like with a slightly larger tire size in case anyone wondered. No level, just stock. Good looking tires in my opinion.”
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
63
Dry
Grabber A/TX +568Why this score
Source Wildpeak WP A/T01 Grabber A/TX Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 65 (est.) ≈ 68 (est.) Reviews found online 61 68 Wildpeak WP A/T01: 60% × 65 (est.) + 40% × 60.7 = 63
Grabber A/TX: 60% × 67.9 (est.) + 40% × 67.9 = 68
No road tests of dry for Wildpeak WP A/T01. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
No road tests of dry for Grabber A/TX. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
-
62
Wet
Grabber A/TX +1173Why this score
Source Wildpeak WP A/T01 Grabber A/TX Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 64 (est.) ≈ 73 (est.) Reviews found online 59 74 Wildpeak WP A/T01: 60% × 64.3 (est.) + 40% × 59 = 62
Grabber A/TX: 60% × 72.6 (est.) + 40% × 74.1 = 73
No road tests of wet for Wildpeak WP A/T01. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
No road tests of wet for Grabber A/TX. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
59
Snow
Grabber A/TX +968Why this score
Source Wildpeak WP A/T01 Grabber A/TX Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 65 (est.) ≈ 69 (est.) Reviews found online 52 67 Wildpeak WP A/T01: 60% × 64.5 (est.) + 40% × 51.7 = 59
Grabber A/TX: 60% × 69.3 (est.) + 40% × 66.8 = 68
No road tests of snow for Wildpeak WP A/T01. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).
No road tests of snow for Grabber A/TX. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).
-
63
Comfort
Wildpeak WP A/T01 +261Why this score
Source Wildpeak WP A/T01 Grabber A/TX Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 67 (est.) ≈ 67 (est.) Reviews found online 60 58 Wildpeak WP A/T01: 40% × 67 (est.) + 60% × 60.2 = 63
Grabber A/TX: 40% × 66.5 (est.) + 60% × 58.1 = 61
No road tests of comfort for Wildpeak WP A/T01. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
No road tests of comfort for Grabber A/TX. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
-
–
Noise
No comparison64Why this score
Source Wildpeak WP A/T01 Grabber A/TX Professional tests (TWG score) – ≈ 66 (est.) Reviews found online – 60 Grabber A/TX: 60% × 66.4 (est.) + 40% × 59.6 = 64
No road tests of noise for Grabber A/TX. The test half is the tested tires’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
61
Treadwear
Grabber A/TX +970Why this score
Source Wildpeak WP A/T01 Grabber A/TX Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 63 (est.) ≈ 69 (est.) Reviews found online 58 72 Wildpeak WP A/T01: 60% × 63.5 (est.) + 40% × 58.1 = 61
Grabber A/TX: 60% × 68.6 (est.) + 40% × 72.4 = 70
No road tests of treadwear for Wildpeak WP A/T01. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
No road tests of treadwear for Grabber A/TX. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
-
58
Handling (owners)
Grabber A/TX +159Why this score
Source Wildpeak WP A/T01 Grabber A/TX Reviews found online 58 59
Scores at a glance
| Category | Falken Wildpeak WP A/T01 | General Grabber A/TX |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 61 | 68 |
| Dry | 63 | 68 |
| Wet | 62 | 73 |
| Snow | 59 | 68 |
| Comfort | 63 | 61 |
| Noise | – | 64 |
| Treadwear | 61 | 70 |
| Handling (owners) | 58 | 59 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Wildpeak WP A/T01
Grabber A/TX
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Wildpeak WP A/T01
Pros
- Quiet and comfortable on-road, with several reviewers noting very little road noise, including on motorways and rural roads
- Strong dry-road performance and capable off-road/light trail traction
- Good initial wet grip and road manners when new; one reviewer found them quieter and better gripping than their previous BFGoodrich T/As
Cons
- Wet-weather grip that is poor or deteriorates with age, with reports of aquaplaning, wheelspin on hills or tight turns, and a need to engage 4WD in rain
- Snow and ice performance is weak, particularly in mushy snow, and can fade markedly after the first season or two
- Tread life is inconsistent and often shorter than expected: about 30k (roadworthy only) on one Patrol, 40-45k per set for another owner, and noticeable degradation by 20,000 km for another
Tire B Grabber A/TX
Pros
- Exceptional winter and snow traction (3-peak mountain snowflake rated)
- Impressively low road noise and high ride comfort for an aggressive all-terrain tire
- Strong wet and dry road grip with confident handling
Cons
- Noticeable decrease in fuel economy (MPG drop)
- Tread tends to pick up and throw small stones and pebbles
- Mixed reviews on long-term treadwear and longevity
What real owners are saying
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Falken Wildpeak WP A/T01
We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.
General Grabber A/TX
Community sentiment toward the General Grabber A/TX is largely positive, with owners frequently praising its winter traction on snow and ice as well as its quiet highway ride. Buyers appreciate its availability in lighter standard load ratings and competitive pricing compared to rivals like the BFG KO2. Minor drawbacks cited include fuel economy loss with heavier LT versions and a tendency for the tread to pick up and fling gravel rocks.
“Thoughts on the “General Grabber A/TX” Tire? I’m thinking about getting it in a 33” SL rated 275/70r18. This tire comes in at 46Lbs which is super light. $915ish for 4! It’s the only 33”, snow rated, All Terrain, C/SL load range I could find. All the other 33”s are E rated coming in around 60lbs.”
“We finally go out first snow storm of winter. We have 8” of fresh snow on the ground, and below that a half an inch of ice (it rained first then snowed). Initial impressions of the General Grabber A/Tx is good. Way quieter than stock tires on the highway, and good traction on snow and ice.”
“Not sure where those ratings are from but all the ratings I have seen on the tire have been on par with other at tires. all 4 cost me 765 installed. My traction in NEPA has been excellent in the snow and wet.”
Based on 37 community posts
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Falken Wildpeak WP A/T01 | B · General Grabber A/TX |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All-Terrain tire | All-Terrain tire |
| Vehicle type | SUV and 4x4 | SUV and 4x4 |
| Sizes available | — | 44 |
| Rim diameters | — | 15″ – 22″ |
| Tread depth | — | 14 - 17/32″ |
| UTQG | — | 640 A A - B |
| Sidewall | — | Black Side Wall - Raised White Lettering |
| Max pressure | — | 35 - 80 psi |
Which one should you actually buy?
Falken Wildpeak WP A/T01
General Grabber A/TX
Winner: General Grabber A/TX — better wet, snow and treadwear. Where the Falken Wildpeak WP A/T01 is ahead, it is by less than 3 points. Falken Wildpeak WP A/T01 rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 10 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
General Grabber A/TX scores 73 vs 62 on wet.
General Grabber A/TX scores 68 vs 59 on snow.
General Grabber A/TX scores 70 vs 61 on treadwear.
General Grabber A/TX scores 68 vs 63 on dry.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Wildpeak WP A/T01 or Grabber A/TX?
Which is better in the wet, Wildpeak WP A/T01 or Grabber A/TX?
General Grabber A/TX, 73 vs 62 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, Wildpeak WP A/T01 or Grabber A/TX?
General Grabber A/TX, 68 vs 63 on our dry score.
Which is better in snow, Wildpeak WP A/T01 or Grabber A/TX?
General Grabber A/TX, 68 vs 59 on our snow score.
Which is more comfortable, Wildpeak WP A/T01 or Grabber A/TX?
Neither, by our numbers: 63 vs 61 on the comfort score, within 3 points.
Which lasts longer, Wildpeak WP A/T01 or Grabber A/TX?
General Grabber A/TX, 70 vs 61 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology