Tests – · none yet Owners 23 · 27 reviews
Falken ZE512 looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.
Falken ZE512 vs Toyo Proxes CF2 SUV — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 2 road tests and 27 + 9 owner reviews. How we score
Proxes CF2 SUV is ahead, 67–37
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 61 · 2 tests Owners 72 · 9 reviews
Best test result: #2 of 11 in 2019 AMS Summer SUV Tyre Test (noise)
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
40
Dry
Proxes CF2 SUV +2262Why this score
Source ZE512 Proxes CF2 SUV Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 2 tests ≈ 50 (est.) 56 Reviews found online 25 73 ZE512: 60% × 50 (est.) + 40% × 24.6 = 40
Proxes CF2 SUV: 60% × 55.7 + 40% × 72.6 = 62
No road tests of dry for ZE512. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).
-
39
Wet
Proxes CF2 SUV +2968Why this score
Source ZE512 Proxes CF2 SUV Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 2 tests ≈ 47 (est.) 65 Reviews found online 28 72 ZE512: 60% × 47.1 (est.) + 40% × 27.6 = 39
Proxes CF2 SUV: 60% × 65.4 + 40% × 71.6 = 68
No road tests of wet for ZE512. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
38
Comfort
Proxes CF2 SUV +3270Why this score
Source ZE512 Proxes CF2 SUV Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 2 tests ≈ 60 (est.) 62 Reviews found online 24 75 ZE512: 40% × 59.7 (est.) + 60% × 24.3 = 38
Proxes CF2 SUV: 40% × 61.8 + 60% × 75.2 = 70
No road tests of comfort for ZE512. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
-
–
Noise
No comparison67Why this score
Source ZE512 Proxes CF2 SUV Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 2 tests – 67 Reviews found online – ≈ 66 (est.) Proxes CF2 SUV: 60% × 67.5 + 40% × 66.3 (est.) = 67
No owner ratings of noise for Proxes CF2 SUV. The owner half is the owners’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.
-
35
Treadwear
Proxes CF2 SUV +3570Why this score
Source ZE512 Proxes CF2 SUV Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 48 (est.) ≈ 69 (est.) Reviews found online 16 72 ZE512: 60% × 48.4 (est.) + 40% × 15.8 = 35
Proxes CF2 SUV: 60% × 68.6 (est.) + 40% × 72.2 = 70
No road tests of treadwear for ZE512. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
No road tests of treadwear for Proxes CF2 SUV. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
-
22
Handling (owners)
Proxes CF2 SUV +5072Why this score
Source ZE512 Proxes CF2 SUV Reviews found online 22 72 -
–
Efficiency
No comparison56Why this score
Source ZE512 Proxes CF2 SUV Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 2 tests – 56
Scores at a glance
| Category | Falken ZE512 | Toyo Proxes CF2 SUV |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 37 | 67 |
| Dry | 40 | 62 |
| Wet | 39 | 68 |
| Comfort | 38 | 70 |
| Noise | – | 67 |
| Treadwear | 35 | 70 |
| Handling (owners) | 22 | 72 |
| Efficiency | – | 56 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
ZE512
Proxes CF2 SUV
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A ZE512
Pros
- Affordable price point
- Satisfactory dry pavement grip when new
- Generally quiet and comfortable ride quality
Cons
- Extremely rapid tread wear and short lifespan
- Poor wet-weather traction and hydroplaning resistance
- Soft sidewalls prone to damage from potholes and curbs
Tire B Proxes CF2 SUV
Pros
- Significantly quieter and smoother ride compared to stock or competitor tires
- Excellent dry grip and handling performance
- Good value for money with favorable durability and wear characteristics
Cons
- Wet grip performance may degrade or feel less confident over time for some users
- Occasional low-frequency rolling noise noted on rough road surfaces
- Wet weather traction can reach its limits during spirited cornering
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Falken ZE512 | B · Toyo Proxes CF2 SUV |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | SUV and 4x4 |
| Sizes available | — | 29 |
| Rim diameters | — | 15″ – 20″ |
| UTQG | 360 - 420 A A | — |
Which one should you actually buy?
Falken ZE512
Toyo Proxes CF2 SUV
Winner: Toyo Proxes CF2 SUV — better handling, treadwear and comfort. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Toyo Proxes CF2 SUV scores 72 vs 22 on handling.
Toyo Proxes CF2 SUV scores 70 vs 35 on treadwear.
Toyo Proxes CF2 SUV scores 70 vs 38 on comfort.
Toyo Proxes CF2 SUV scores 68 vs 39 on wet.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
ZE512 or Proxes CF2 SUV?
Which is better in the wet, ZE512 or Proxes CF2 SUV?
Toyo Proxes CF2 SUV, 68 vs 39 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, ZE512 or Proxes CF2 SUV?
Toyo Proxes CF2 SUV, 62 vs 40 on our dry score.
Which is more comfortable, ZE512 or Proxes CF2 SUV?
Toyo Proxes CF2 SUV, 70 vs 38 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, ZE512 or Proxes CF2 SUV?
Toyo Proxes CF2 SUV, 70 vs 35 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology