Falken ZE912 looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.

Head-to-head Updated

Falken ZE912 vs Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 0 + 21 road tests and 200 + 1,241 owner reviews. How we score

ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun is ahead, 73–66

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Falken ZE912
Tire AFalken

ZE912

Summer

Tests – · none yet Owners 64 · 200 reviews

“Quote: Originally Posted by BobDogNdaHouse I just ordered some 912's (215/45) so I will give a review in a few weeks. I got them for $76 ea, but have seen them for $68, cant beat the price Thats a great price!!! What store did you see 215/45/17 for $68?”

Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun
Tire BFalken

ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun

Summer

Tests 76 · 21 tests Owners 68 · 1,241 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 21 in 2022 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test (straight aquaplaning)

“Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun, very grippy especially in the wet”

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 66

    Dry

    ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun +9
    75
    Why this score
    SourceZE912ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 20 tests≈ 67 (est.)79
    Reviews found online6569

    ZE912: 60% × 66.6 (est.) + 40% × 65 = 66

    ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun: 60% × 79.1 + 40% × 68.5 = 75

    No road tests of dry for ZE912. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

  2. 68

    Wet

    ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun +11
    79
    Why this score
    SourceZE912ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 20 tests≈ 68 (est.)84
    Reviews found online6771

    ZE912: 60% × 68.4 (est.) + 40% × 67.3 = 68

    ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun: 60% × 84.4 + 40% × 70.9 = 79

    No road tests of wet for ZE912. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

  3. 68

    Comfort

    ZE912 +6
    62
    Why this score
    SourceZE912ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 2 tests≈ 69 (est.)60
    Reviews found online6665

    ZE912: 60% × 68.6 (est.) + 40% × 66.3 = 68

    ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun: 60% × 60.5 + 40% × 65 = 62

    No road tests of comfort for ZE912. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  4. –

    Noise

    No comparison
    67
    Why this score
    SourceZE912ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 14 tests–66
    Reviews found online–≈ 67 (est.)

    ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun: 60% × 66 + 40% × 67.3 (est.) = 67

    No owner ratings of noise for ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun. The owner half is the owners’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.

  5. 63

    Treadwear

    ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun +6
    69
    Why this score
    SourceZE912ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 6 tests≈ 64 (est.)72
    Reviews found online6065

    ZE912: 60% × 64 (est.) + 40% × 60.4 = 63

    ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun: 60% × 72.1 + 40% × 64.9 = 69

    No road tests of treadwear for ZE912. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

  6. 63

    Handling (owners)

    ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun +4
    67
    Why this score
    SourceZE912ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun
    Reviews found online6367
Scores at a glance
Falken ZE912 vs Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryFalken ZE912Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun
Relative Score 66 73
Dry 66 75
Wet 68 79
Comfort 68 62
Noise – 67
Treadwear 63 69
Handling (owners) 63 67

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score

ZE912

ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

The professional test results behind the scores

Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.

DisciplineCategoryZE912ZIEX ZE310 EcoRunΔHead-to-head
Also published by the testers (not in the score)
Overall Ranking Overall #13/14 2011 European Summer Tyre Test - 195/65 R15 #3/6 2025 Wybór Kierowców Summer Tire Test R16 – Different tests

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A ZE912

Pros

  • Excellent value for money compared to premium brands
  • Low road noise and high ride comfort
  • Strong dry-weather grip and predictable handling

Cons

  • Inconsistent tread life, with many reports of premature wear
  • Soft sidewalls can lead to a 'squishy' feel or lack of steering precision
  • Wet-weather performance is frequently described as unpredictable or lacking at the limit
All owner themes in the ZE912 review

Tire B ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun

Pros

  • Exceptionally low road noise and high cabin comfort
  • Strong grip and stability in both wet and dry weather conditions
  • Outstanding value for money compared to premium brands

Cons

  • Some drivers report higher rolling resistance and slightly increased fuel consumption
  • Soft sidewalls can lead to vague initial steering response or a less sporty feel during hard cornering
  • Occasional complaints of a firmer, harsher ride over bumps depending on vehicle suspension and aspect ratio
All owner themes in the ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun review

What real owners are saying

From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score

Tire A

Falken ZE912

Mixed

Community consensus on the Falken Ziex ZE912 highlights it as an affordable, comfortable, and relatively quiet all-season tire with decent dry and predictable wet traction. However, users frequently criticize its rapid treadwear, poor winter/snow grip, tendency to develop road noise over time, and softer sidewalls compared to dedicated performance summer tires.

Top themes
#affordable pricing and value#quiet and comfortable ride#poor snow and winter performance#noise level over time#treadwear and longevity#sidewall stiffness and handling#wet road traction

Based on 50 community posts

Tire B

Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun

Positive

Community sentiment regarding the Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun is generally positive, with specific praise noted for its strong wet grip. Users frequently evaluate it as an affordable alternative alongside other budget-friendly options for smaller or standard passenger vehicles.

Top themes
#wet weather performance#budget friendly options#tire size availability#grip and handling#eco-run efficiency

Based on 5 community posts

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Falken ZE912 B · Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun
CategorySummerSummer
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available—86
Rim diameters—14″ – 19″

Which one should you actually buy?

Falken ZE912

Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun

Winner: Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun — better wet, dry and treadwear. Pick the Falken ZE912 if comfort matters most to you.

Pick tire B Your priority is wet-weather safety

Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun scores 79 vs 68 on wet.

Pick tire B You want the most grip on dry roads

Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun scores 75 vs 66 on dry.

Pick tire A You want the most comfortable ride

Falken ZE912 scores 68 vs 62 on comfort.

Pick tire B You want the longest tread life

Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun scores 69 vs 63 on treadwear.

Tire A · Falken ZE912
Tire B · Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

ZE912 or ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun?

Which is better in the wet, ZE912 or ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun?

Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun, 79 vs 68 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, ZE912 or ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun?

Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun, 75 vs 66 on our dry score.

Which is more comfortable, ZE912 or ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun?

Falken ZE912, 68 vs 62 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, ZE912 or ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun?

Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun, 69 vs 63 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology