Falken ZE912 looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.

Head-to-head Updated

Falken ZE912 vs Kumho Ecsta PS71 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 14 road tests and 200 + 8,168 owner reviews. How we score

Ecsta PS71 is ahead, 73–66

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Falken ZE912
Tire AFalken

ZE912

Summer

± 8

Tests – · none yet Owners 64 · 200 reviews

“I just put a set of Falken ZE912's on my wife's CLK and found them to be a lot quieter and smoother than the previous tires that were on the car. They aren't as precise handling as the Michelin or Pirelli's that were on there before, but definately more comfortable.”

Kumho Ecsta PS71
Tire BKumho

Ecsta PS71

Summer

± 5

Tests 68 · 14 tests Owners 69 · 8,168 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 18 in 2025 ADAC Summer Tyre Test (straight aquaplaning)

“Those are Kumho Ecsta PS71s, thread width is supposed to be 245mm, the actual one is hardly 235. How so?”

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 66

    Dry

    Ecsta PS71 +9
    75
    Why this score
    SourceZE912Ecsta PS71
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 12 tests≈ 67 (est.)78
    Reviews found online6672

    ZE912: 60% × 67 (est.) + 40% × 65.5 = 66

    Ecsta PS71: 60% × 77.6 + 40% × 72.2 = 75

    No road tests of dry for ZE912. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).

  2. 69

    Wet

    Ecsta PS71 +16
    85
    Why this score
    SourceZE912Ecsta PS71
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 13 tests≈ 69 (est.)92
    Reviews found online6875

    ZE912: 60% × 69.1 (est.) + 40% × 67.7 = 69

    Ecsta PS71: 60% × 92.5 + 40% × 74.8 = 85

    No road tests of wet for ZE912. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. 67

    Comfort

    Ecsta PS71 +3
    70
    Why this score
    SourceZE912Ecsta PS71
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 2 tests≈ 69 (est.)75
    Reviews found online6666

    ZE912: 40% × 68.6 (est.) + 60% × 66.2 = 67

    Ecsta PS71: 40% × 75.3 + 60% × 65.8 = 70

    No road tests of comfort for ZE912. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  4. –

    Noise

    No comparison
    36
    Why this score
    SourceZE912Ecsta PS71
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 8 tests–15
    Reviews found online–≈ 67 (est.)

    Ecsta PS71: 60% × 15.5 + 40% × 66.6 (est.) = 36

    No owner ratings of noise for Ecsta PS71. The owner half is the owners’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.

  5. 62

    Treadwear

    ZE912 +11
    51
    Why this score
    SourceZE912Ecsta PS71
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 6 tests≈ 64 (est.)45
    Reviews found online5961

    ZE912: 60% × 63.5 (est.) + 40% × 58.7 = 62

    Ecsta PS71: 60% × 45.1 + 40% × 60.7 = 51

    No road tests of treadwear for ZE912. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).

  6. 62

    Handling (owners)

    Ecsta PS71 +11
    73
    Why this score
    SourceZE912Ecsta PS71
    Reviews found online6273
  7. –

    Efficiency

    No comparison
    48
    Why this score
    SourceZE912Ecsta PS71
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 7 tests–48
Scores at a glance
Falken ZE912 vs Kumho Ecsta PS71: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryFalken ZE912Kumho Ecsta PS71
Relative Score 66 73
Dry 66 75
Wet 69 85
Comfort 67 70
Noise – 36
Treadwear 62 51
Handling (owners) 62 73
Efficiency – 48

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Recomputed
Headline score
± 8

ZE912

± 5

Ecsta PS71

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

The professional test results behind the scores

Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.

DisciplineCategoryZE912Ecsta PS71ΔHead-to-head
Also published by the testers (not in the score)
Overall Ranking Overall #13/14 2011 European Summer Tyre Test - 195/65 R15 #4/52 2025 Summer Tyre Test Shootout – Different tests

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A ZE912

Pros

  • Excellent value for money compared to premium brands
  • Low road noise and high ride comfort
  • Strong dry-weather grip and predictable handling

Cons

  • Inconsistent tread life, with many reports of premature wear
  • Soft sidewalls can lead to a 'squishy' feel or lack of steering precision
  • Wet-weather performance is frequently described as unpredictable or lacking at the limit
All owner themes in the ZE912 review

Tire B Ecsta PS71

Pros

  • Outstanding wet weather grip and aquaplaning resistance
  • High value for money compared to tier-one premium brands
  • Predictable handling and solid cornering stability in both dry and wet conditions

Cons

  • Noticeable road noise or droning at motorway speeds on certain vehicles
  • Occasional reports of balancing difficulties or out-of-round/egg-shaped tires
  • Softer sidewalls can lead to slightly vague steering response around center or tread block movement
All owner themes in the Ecsta PS71 review

What real owners are saying

From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score

Tire A

Falken ZE912

Mixed

Community consensus on the Falken Ziex ZE912 highlights it as an affordable, comfortable, and relatively quiet all-season tire with decent dry and predictable wet traction. However, users frequently criticize its rapid treadwear, poor winter/snow grip, tendency to develop road noise over time, and softer sidewalls compared to dedicated performance summer tires.

Top themes
#affordable pricing and value#quiet and comfortable ride#poor snow and winter performance#noise level over time#treadwear and longevity#sidewall stiffness and handling#wet road traction

Based on 50 community posts

Tire B

Kumho Ecsta PS71

Positive

Community sentiment towards the Kumho Ecsta PS71 is generally positive, with drivers viewing it as an affordable, high-value mid-range/UHP tire that performs reliably compared to premium brands. Users praise its wet grip rating, competitive pricing, and overall road manners once warmed up, though some note it provides adequate rather than top-tier grip and raise questions regarding cold performance and tread life.

Top themes
#Value for money#Wet grip performance#UHP budget alternative#Tread wear durability#Warm-up temperature behavior#Tire pressure specifications

Based on 24 community posts

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Falken ZE912 B · Kumho Ecsta PS71
CategorySummerSummer
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available—133
Rim diameters—16″ – 22″
Sidewall—Blackwall

Which one should you actually buy?

Falken ZE912

Kumho Ecsta PS71

Winner: Kumho Ecsta PS71 — better wet, handling and dry. Pick the Falken ZE912 if treadwear matters most to you.

Pick tire B Your priority is wet-weather safety

Kumho Ecsta PS71 scores 85 vs 69 on wet.

Pick tire A You want the longest tread life

Falken ZE912 scores 62 vs 51 on treadwear.

Pick tire B You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Kumho Ecsta PS71 scores 73 vs 62 on handling.

Pick tire B You want the most grip on dry roads

Kumho Ecsta PS71 scores 75 vs 66 on dry.

Tire A · Falken ZE912
Tire B · Kumho Ecsta PS71

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

ZE912 or Ecsta PS71?

Which is better in the wet, ZE912 or Ecsta PS71?

Kumho Ecsta PS71, 85 vs 69 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, ZE912 or Ecsta PS71?

Kumho Ecsta PS71, 75 vs 66 on our dry score.

Which is more comfortable, ZE912 or Ecsta PS71?

Kumho Ecsta PS71, 70 vs 67 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, ZE912 or Ecsta PS71?

Falken ZE912, 62 vs 51 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology