Falken ZE912 looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.

Head-to-head Updated

Falken ZE912 vs Nexen N Blue HD+ — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 0 + 5 road tests and 200 + 82 owner reviews. How we score

N Blue HD+ is ahead, 71–66

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Falken ZE912
Tire AFalken

ZE912

Summer

Tests – · none yet Owners 64 · 200 reviews

“Quote: Originally Posted by BobDogNdaHouse I just ordered some 912's (215/45) so I will give a review in a few weeks. I got them for $76 ea, but have seen them for $68, cant beat the price Thats a great price!!! What store did you see 215/45/17 for $68?”

Nexen N Blue HD+
Tire BNexen

N Blue HD+

Summer

Tests 70 · 5 tests Owners 70 · 82 reviews

Best test result: #2 of 10 in 2017 Mid Range Tyre Test (dry braking)

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 66

    Dry

    N Blue HD+ +6
    72
    Why this score
    SourceZE912N Blue HD+
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 5 tests≈ 67 (est.)73
    Reviews found online6570

    ZE912: 60% × 66.6 (est.) + 40% × 65 = 66

    N Blue HD+: 60% × 73.4 + 40% × 69.6 = 72

    No road tests of dry for ZE912. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

  2. 68

    Wet

    N Blue HD+ +5
    73
    Why this score
    SourceZE912N Blue HD+
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 5 tests≈ 68 (est.)73
    Reviews found online6773

    ZE912: 60% × 68.4 (est.) + 40% × 67.3 = 68

    N Blue HD+: 60% × 72.9 + 40% × 72.7 = 73

    No road tests of wet for ZE912. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

  3. 68

    Comfort

    N Blue HD+ +3
    71
    Why this score
    SourceZE912N Blue HD+
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests≈ 69 (est.)70
    Reviews found online6671

    ZE912: 60% × 68.6 (est.) + 40% × 66.3 = 68

    N Blue HD+: 60% × 70 + 40% × 71.3 = 71

    No road tests of comfort for ZE912. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  4. –

    Noise

    No comparison
    67
    Why this score
    SourceZE912N Blue HD+
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 2 tests–67
    Reviews found online–≈ 67 (est.)

    N Blue HD+: 60% × 66.6 + 40% × 67.3 (est.) = 67

    No owner ratings of noise for N Blue HD+. The owner half is the owners’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.

  5. 63

    Treadwear

    N Blue HD+ +2
    65
    Why this score
    SourceZE912N Blue HD+
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests≈ 64 (est.)64
    Reviews found online6067

    ZE912: 60% × 64 (est.) + 40% × 60.4 = 63

    N Blue HD+: 60% × 64.5 + 40% × 66.6 = 65

    No road tests of treadwear for ZE912. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

  6. 63

    Handling (owners)

    N Blue HD+ +7
    70
    Why this score
    SourceZE912N Blue HD+
    Reviews found online6370
Scores at a glance
Falken ZE912 vs Nexen N Blue HD+: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryFalken ZE912Nexen N Blue HD+
Relative Score 66 71
Dry 66 72
Wet 68 73
Comfort 68 71
Noise – 67
Treadwear 63 65
Handling (owners) 63 70

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score

ZE912

N Blue HD+

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

The professional test results behind the scores

Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.

DisciplineCategoryZE912N Blue HD+ΔHead-to-head
Also published by the testers (not in the score)
Overall Ranking Overall #13/14 2011 European Summer Tyre Test - 195/65 R15 #15/53 2021 53 Summer Tyre Braking Test – Different tests

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A ZE912

Pros

  • Excellent value for money compared to premium brands
  • Low road noise and high ride comfort
  • Strong dry-weather grip and predictable handling

Cons

  • Inconsistent tread life, with many reports of premature wear
  • Soft sidewalls can lead to a 'squishy' feel or lack of steering precision
  • Wet-weather performance is frequently described as unpredictable or lacking at the limit
All owner themes in the ZE912 review

Tire B N Blue HD+

Pros

  • Excellent value for money compared to premium brands
  • High level of ride comfort and very low road noise
  • Reliable and stable grip in both dry and wet conditions for normal driving

Cons

  • Accelerated tread wear reported by some users
  • Vague handling and loss of predictability when pushed hard or cornered aggressively
  • Occasional reports of shoulder cracking or ruptures
All owner themes in the N Blue HD+ review

What real owners are saying

From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score

Tire A

Falken ZE912

Mixed

Community consensus on the Falken Ziex ZE912 highlights it as an affordable, comfortable, and relatively quiet all-season tire with decent dry and predictable wet traction. However, users frequently criticize its rapid treadwear, poor winter/snow grip, tendency to develop road noise over time, and softer sidewalls compared to dedicated performance summer tires.

Top themes
#affordable pricing and value#quiet and comfortable ride#poor snow and winter performance#noise level over time#treadwear and longevity#sidewall stiffness and handling#wet road traction

Based on 50 community posts

Tire B

Nexen N Blue HD+

We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Falken ZE912 B · Nexen N Blue HD+
CategorySummerSummer
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover

Which one should you actually buy?

Falken ZE912

Nexen N Blue HD+

Winner: Nexen N Blue HD+ — better handling, dry and wet. It leads or ties in every category we score.

Pick tire B You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Nexen N Blue HD+ scores 70 vs 63 on handling.

Pick tire B You want the most grip on dry roads

Nexen N Blue HD+ scores 72 vs 66 on dry.

Pick tire B Your priority is wet-weather safety

Nexen N Blue HD+ scores 73 vs 68 on wet.

Pick tire B You want the most comfortable ride

Nexen N Blue HD+ scores 71 vs 68 on comfort.

Tire A · Falken ZE912
Tire B · Nexen N Blue HD+

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

ZE912 or N Blue HD+?

Which is better in the wet, ZE912 or N Blue HD+?

Nexen N Blue HD+, 73 vs 68 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, ZE912 or N Blue HD+?

Nexen N Blue HD+, 72 vs 66 on our dry score.

Which is more comfortable, ZE912 or N Blue HD+?

Nexen N Blue HD+, 71 vs 68 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, ZE912 or N Blue HD+?

Neither, by our numbers: 63 vs 65 on the treadwear score, within 3 points.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology