Falken ZE912 looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 200 + 60 owner reviews. How we score
BluEarth Es ES32 leads, 70–66 Narrow edge
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 64 · 200 reviews
“Quote: Originally Posted by BobDogNdaHouse I just ordered some 912's (215/45) so I will give a review in a few weeks. I got them for $76 ea, but have seen them for $68, cant beat the price Thats a great price!!! What store did you see 215/45/17 for $68?”
Tests – · none yet Owners 70 · 60 reviews
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
| Source | ZE912 | BluEarth Es ES32 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | ≈ 67 (est.) | ≈ 69 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 65 | 71 |
ZE912: 60% × 66.6 (est.) + 40% × 65 = 66
BluEarth Es ES32: 60% × 68.9 (est.) + 40% × 70.6 = 70
No road tests of dry for ZE912. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).
No road tests of dry for BluEarth Es ES32. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).
| Source | ZE912 | BluEarth Es ES32 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | ≈ 68 (est.) | ≈ 71 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 67 | 73 |
ZE912: 60% × 68.4 (est.) + 40% × 67.3 = 68
BluEarth Es ES32: 60% × 71.3 (est.) + 40% × 72.5 = 72
No road tests of wet for ZE912. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).
No road tests of wet for BluEarth Es ES32. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).
| Source | ZE912 | BluEarth Es ES32 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | ≈ 69 (est.) | ≈ 70 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 66 | 74 |
ZE912: 60% × 68.6 (est.) + 40% × 66.3 = 68
BluEarth Es ES32: 60% × 70 (est.) + 40% × 74.3 = 72
No road tests of comfort for ZE912 or BluEarth Es ES32. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
| Source | ZE912 | BluEarth Es ES32 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | ≈ 64 (est.) | ≈ 65 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 60 | 65 |
ZE912: 60% × 64 (est.) + 40% × 60.4 = 63
BluEarth Es ES32: 60% × 65.3 (est.) + 40% × 64.6 = 65
No road tests of treadwear for ZE912. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).
No road tests of treadwear for BluEarth Es ES32. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).
| Source | ZE912 | BluEarth Es ES32 |
|---|---|---|
| Reviews found online | 63 | 73 |
| Category | Falken ZE912 | Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 66 | 70 |
| Dry | 66 | 70 |
| Wet | 68 | 72 |
| Comfort | 68 | 72 |
| Treadwear | 63 | 65 |
| Handling (owners) | 63 | 73 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
ZE912
BluEarth Es ES32
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Community consensus on the Falken Ziex ZE912 highlights it as an affordable, comfortable, and relatively quiet all-season tire with decent dry and predictable wet traction. However, users frequently criticize its rapid treadwear, poor winter/snow grip, tendency to develop road noise over time, and softer sidewalls compared to dedicated performance summer tires.
“decent A/S tire, gets through the snow well, but not so good at corners in the snow with the large shoulder blocks.... but since the snow is only on the road for a couple days around here, they work great and I would rather have better dry traction for the 90% of the time when there is no snow. My only issue so far is they tramline when on grooved pavement because the tires have circumferential grooves”
“I just put a set of Falken ZE912's on my wife's CLK and found them to be a lot quieter and smoother than the previous tires that were on the car. They aren't as precise handling as the Michelin or Pirelli's that were on there before, but definately more comfortable.”
“Quote: Originally Posted by BobDogNdaHouse I just ordered some 912's (215/45) so I will give a review in a few weeks. I got them for $76 ea, but have seen them for $68, cant beat the price Thats a great price!!! What store did you see 215/45/17 for $68?”
Based on 50 community posts
We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.
| Attribute | A · Falken ZE912 | B · Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | — | 64 |
| Rim diameters | — | 13″ – 18″ |
Falken ZE912
Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32
Narrow edge: Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 — better handling, dry and wet. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 scores 73 vs 63 on handling.
Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 scores 70 vs 66 on dry.
Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 scores 72 vs 68 on wet.
Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 scores 72 vs 68 on comfort.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32, 72 vs 68 on our wet score.
Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32, 70 vs 66 on our dry score.
Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32, 72 vs 68 on our comfort score.
Neither, by our numbers: 63 vs 65 on the treadwear score, within 3 points.
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology
