Tests – · none yet Owners 78 · 100 reviews
Head-to-head
Updated
Falken ZE914 vs Michelin Primacy LC — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 100 + 12 owner reviews. How we score
ZE914 is ahead, 75–67
Add your size for an exact match
/R
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 66 · 12 reviews
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
76
Dry
ZE914 +1066Why this score
Source ZE914 Primacy LC Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 73 (est.) ≈ 67 (est.) Reviews found online 81 65 ZE914: 60% × 73.2 (est.) + 40% × 80.6 = 76
Primacy LC: 60% × 66.9 (est.) + 40% × 65.3 = 66
No road tests of dry for ZE914. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
No road tests of dry for Primacy LC. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
-
77
Wet
ZE914 +770Why this score
Source ZE914 Primacy LC Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 75 (est.) ≈ 70 (est.) Reviews found online 79 70 ZE914: 60% × 75.5 (est.) + 40% × 79.4 = 77
Primacy LC: 60% × 70.4 (est.) + 40% × 70.1 = 70
No road tests of wet for ZE914. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
No road tests of wet for Primacy LC. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
73
Comfort
ZE914 +469Why this score
Source ZE914 Primacy LC Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 70 (est.) ≈ 69 (est.) Reviews found online 74 70 ZE914: 40% × 69.8 (est.) + 60% × 74.4 = 73
Primacy LC: 40% × 68.8 (est.) + 60% × 69.5 = 69
No road tests of comfort for ZE914. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
No road tests of comfort for Primacy LC. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
-
72
Treadwear
ZE914 +963Why this score
Source ZE914 Primacy LC Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 70 (est.) ≈ 65 (est.) Reviews found online 76 61 ZE914: 60% × 69.9 (est.) + 40% × 76 = 72
Primacy LC: 60% × 64.6 (est.) + 40% × 61.3 = 63
No road tests of treadwear for ZE914. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
No road tests of treadwear for Primacy LC. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
-
77
Handling (owners)
ZE914 +1562Why this score
Source ZE914 Primacy LC Reviews found online 77 62
Scores at a glance
| Category | Falken ZE914 | Michelin Primacy LC |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 75 | 67 |
| Dry | 76 | 66 |
| Wet | 77 | 70 |
| Comfort | 73 | 69 |
| Treadwear | 72 | 63 |
| Handling (owners) | 77 | 62 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
75
/ 100
ZE914
67
/ 100
Primacy LC
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A ZE914
Pros
- Exceptional value for money compared to premium competitors
- Strong, predictable grip in both dry and wet conditions
- Progressive handling characteristics that provide driver confidence
Cons
- Reports of increased road noise, particularly as the tread wears down
- Inconsistent tread life, with some users experiencing premature wear
- Occasional reports of poor wet-weather traction on specific high-torque or lightweight sports vehicles
Tire B Primacy LC
Pros
- Exceptional noise suppression and quiet operation
- High level of ride comfort and cushioning
- Low rolling resistance contributing to improved fuel economy
Cons
- Soft sidewalls leading to increased body roll and wobbling
- Vulnerability to damage from potholes and road hazards
- High price point relative to some competitors
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Falken ZE914 | B · Michelin Primacy LC |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| UTQG | 320 A - B A | — |
Which one should you actually buy?
75
/ 100
Falken ZE914
67
/ 100
Michelin Primacy LC
Winner: Falken ZE914 — better handling, dry and treadwear. It leads or ties in every category we score. Michelin Primacy LC rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 12 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Pick tire A
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Falken ZE914 scores 77 vs 62 on handling.
Pick tire A
You want the most grip on dry roads
Falken ZE914 scores 76 vs 66 on dry.
Pick tire A
You want the longest tread life
Falken ZE914 scores 72 vs 63 on treadwear.
Pick tire A
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Falken ZE914 scores 77 vs 70 on wet.
Tire A · Falken ZE914
Tire B · Michelin Primacy LC
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
ZE914 or Primacy LC?
Which is better in the wet, ZE914 or Primacy LC?
Falken ZE914, 77 vs 70 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, ZE914 or Primacy LC?
Falken ZE914, 76 vs 66 on our dry score.
Which is more comfortable, ZE914 or Primacy LC?
Falken ZE914, 73 vs 69 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, ZE914 or Primacy LC?
Falken ZE914, 72 vs 63 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology