Head-to-head Updated

Falken ZE914 vs Yokohama A.Drive — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 99 + 28 owner reviews. How we score

ZE914 is ahead, 73–62

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Falken ZE914
Tire AFalken

ZE914

Summer

Tests – · none yet Owners 74 · 99 reviews

Yokohama A.Drive
Tire BYokohama

A.Drive

Summer

Tests – · none yet Owners 60 · 28 reviews

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 74

    Dry

    ZE914 +13
    61
    Why this score
    SourceZE914A.Drive
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 72 (est.)≈ 64 (est.)
    Reviews found online7758

    ZE914: 60% × 71.5 (est.) + 40% × 77.2 = 74

    A.Drive: 60% × 63.7 (est.) + 40% × 57.7 = 61

    No road tests of dry for ZE914. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

    No road tests of dry for A.Drive. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

  2. 74

    Wet

    ZE914 +12
    62
    Why this score
    SourceZE914A.Drive
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 73 (est.)≈ 64 (est.)
    Reviews found online7659

    ZE914: 60% × 73 (est.) + 40% × 75.5 = 74

    A.Drive: 60% × 63.5 (est.) + 40% × 58.6 = 62

    No road tests of wet for ZE914. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

    No road tests of wet for A.Drive. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

  3. 71

    Comfort

    ZE914 +7
    64
    Why this score
    SourceZE914A.Drive
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 70 (est.)≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online7258

    ZE914: 60% × 69.7 (est.) + 40% × 72.4 = 71

    A.Drive: 60% × 67.2 (est.) + 40% × 58.2 = 64

    No road tests of comfort for ZE914 or A.Drive. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  4. 68

    Treadwear

    ZE914 +3
    65
    Why this score
    SourceZE914A.Drive
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 67 (est.)≈ 65 (est.)
    Reviews found online7064

    ZE914: 60% × 67.1 (est.) + 40% × 70.3 = 68

    A.Drive: 60% × 65.2 (est.) + 40% × 64.4 = 65

    No road tests of treadwear for ZE914. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

    No road tests of treadwear for A.Drive. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

  5. 75

    Handling (owners)

    ZE914 +16
    59
    Why this score
    SourceZE914A.Drive
    Reviews found online7559
Scores at a glance
Falken ZE914 vs Yokohama A.Drive: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryFalken ZE914Yokohama A.Drive
Relative Score 73 62
Dry 74 61
Wet 74 62
Comfort 71 64
Treadwear 68 65
Handling (owners) 75 59

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score

ZE914

A.Drive

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A ZE914

Pros

  • Exceptional value for money compared to premium competitors
  • Strong, predictable grip in both dry and wet conditions
  • Progressive handling characteristics that provide driver confidence

Cons

  • Reports of increased road noise, particularly as the tread wears down
  • Inconsistent tread life, with some users experiencing premature wear
  • Occasional reports of poor wet-weather traction on specific high-torque or lightweight sports vehicles
All owner themes in the ZE914 review

Tire B A.Drive

Pros

  • Competitive price point offering good value for money
  • Reliable and predictable grip in dry road conditions
  • Solid durability and tread life for many users

Cons

  • Significant issues with wet-weather traction and aquaplaning
  • High levels of road noise, particularly at highway speeds
  • Inconsistent tread wear performance across different driving styles
All owner themes in the A.Drive review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Falken ZE914 B · Yokohama A.Drive
CategorySummerSummer
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover

Which one should you actually buy?

Falken ZE914

Yokohama A.Drive

Winner: Falken ZE914 — better handling, dry and wet. It leads or ties in every category we score.

Pick tire A You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Falken ZE914 scores 75 vs 59 on handling.

Pick tire A You want the most grip on dry roads

Falken ZE914 scores 74 vs 61 on dry.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

Falken ZE914 scores 74 vs 62 on wet.

Pick tire A You want the most comfortable ride

Falken ZE914 scores 71 vs 64 on comfort.

Tire A · Falken ZE914
Tire B · Yokohama A.Drive

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

ZE914 or A.Drive?

Which is better in the wet, ZE914 or A.Drive?

Falken ZE914, 74 vs 62 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, ZE914 or A.Drive?

Falken ZE914, 74 vs 61 on our dry score.

Which is more comfortable, ZE914 or A.Drive?

Falken ZE914, 71 vs 64 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, ZE914 or A.Drive?

Falken ZE914, 68 vs 65 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology