tirewheelguide

Falken ZIEX ZE329 looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.

Head-to-head Updated

Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun vs Falken ZIEX ZE329 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 21 + 0 road tests and 1,241 + 23 owner reviews. How we score

ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun is ahead, 73–50

Check price on Amazon · ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun or ZIEX ZE329 on Amazon
Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun
Tire AFalken

ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun

Summer

Tests 76 · 21 tests Owners 68 · 1,241 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 21 in 2022 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test (straight aquaplaning)

“Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun, very grippy especially in the wet”

Falken ZIEX ZE329
Tire BFalken

ZIEX ZE329

All-Season

Tests – · none yet Owners 41 · 23 reviews

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 75

    Dry

    ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun +25
    50
    Why this score
    SourceZIEX ZE310 EcoRunZIEX ZE329
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 20 / – tests79≈ 56 (est.)
    Reviews found online6940

    ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun: 60% × 79.1 + 40% × 68.5 = 75

    ZIEX ZE329: 60% × 56.4 (est.) + 40% × 39.6 = 50

    No road tests of dry for ZIEX ZE329. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

  2. 79

    Wet

    ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun +28
    51
    Why this score
    SourceZIEX ZE310 EcoRunZIEX ZE329
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 20 / – tests84≈ 56 (est.)
    Reviews found online7145

    ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun: 60% × 84.4 + 40% × 70.9 = 79

    ZIEX ZE329: 60% × 55.8 (est.) + 40% × 44.8 = 51

    No road tests of wet for ZIEX ZE329. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

  3. –

    Snow

    No comparison
    57
    Why this score
    SourceZIEX ZE310 EcoRunZIEX ZE329
    Professional tests (TWG score)–≈ 63 (est.)
    Reviews found online–48

    ZIEX ZE329: 60% × 62.5 (est.) + 40% × 47.7 = 57

    No road tests of snow for ZIEX ZE329. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).

  4. 62

    Comfort

    ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun +11
    51
    Why this score
    SourceZIEX ZE310 EcoRunZIEX ZE329
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 2 / – tests60≈ 63 (est.)
    Reviews found online6534

    ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun: 60% × 60.5 + 40% × 65 = 62

    ZIEX ZE329: 60% × 63 (est.) + 40% × 33.7 = 51

    No road tests of comfort for ZIEX ZE329. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. 67

    Noise

    ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun +5
    62
    Why this score
    SourceZIEX ZE310 EcoRunZIEX ZE329
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 14 / – tests66≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online≈ 67 (est.)53

    ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun: 60% × 66 + 40% × 67.3 (est.) = 67

    ZIEX ZE329: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 53.2 = 62

    No owner ratings of noise for ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun. The owner half is the owners’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.

    No road tests of noise for ZIEX ZE329. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 69

    Treadwear

    ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun +23
    46
    Why this score
    SourceZIEX ZE310 EcoRunZIEX ZE329
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 6 / – tests72≈ 55 (est.)
    Reviews found online6532

    ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun: 60% × 72.1 + 40% × 64.9 = 69

    ZIEX ZE329: 60% × 55.3 (est.) + 40% × 32 = 46

    No road tests of treadwear for ZIEX ZE329. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

  7. 67

    Handling (owners)

    ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun +26
    41
    Why this score
    SourceZIEX ZE310 EcoRunZIEX ZE329
    Reviews found online6741
Scores at a glance
CategoryFalken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRunFalken ZIEX ZE329
Relative Score 73 50
Dry 75 50
Wet 79 51
Snow – 57
Comfort 62 51
Noise 67 62
Treadwear 69 46
Handling (owners) 67 41

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score

ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun

ZIEX ZE329

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun

Pros

  • Exceptionally low road noise and high cabin comfort
  • Strong grip and stability in both wet and dry weather conditions
  • Outstanding value for money compared to premium brands

Cons

  • Some drivers report higher rolling resistance and slightly increased fuel consumption
  • Soft sidewalls can lead to vague initial steering response or a less sporty feel during hard cornering
  • Occasional complaints of a firmer, harsher ride over bumps depending on vehicle suspension and aspect ratio
All owner themes in the ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun review

Tire B ZIEX ZE329

Pros

  • Affordable price point offering great value
  • Good traction and grip on dry pavement
  • Balanced overall performance for everyday commuting

Cons

  • Rapid and premature tread wear, falling short of expected mileage
  • Poor wet and winter weather traction, described as dangerous in snow
  • Excessive road noise and highway hum reported by multiple users
All owner themes in the ZIEX ZE329 review

What real owners are saying

From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score

Tire A

Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun

Positive

Community sentiment regarding the Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun is generally positive, with specific praise noted for its strong wet grip. Users frequently evaluate it as an affordable alternative alongside other budget-friendly options for smaller or standard passenger vehicles.

Top themes
#wet weather performance#budget friendly options#tire size availability#grip and handling#eco-run efficiency

Based on 5 community posts

Tire B

Falken ZIEX ZE329

We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun B · Falken ZIEX ZE329
CategorySummerAll-Season
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available86—
Rim diameters14″ – 19″—
Tread depth—6/32″
UTQG—480 A A
Treadwear warranty—60,000 mi
Sidewall—Blackwall
Max pressure—51 psi

Which one should you actually buy?

Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun

Falken ZIEX ZE329

Winner: Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun — better wet, handling and dry. It leads or ties in every category we score.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun scores 79 vs 51 on wet.

Pick tire A You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun scores 67 vs 41 on handling.

Pick tire A You want the most grip on dry roads

Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun scores 75 vs 50 on dry.

Pick tire A You want the longest tread life

Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun scores 69 vs 46 on treadwear.

Tire A · Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun
Check price on Amazon
Tire B · Falken ZIEX ZE329
Check price on Amazon

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun or ZIEX ZE329?

Which is better in the wet, ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun or ZIEX ZE329?

Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun, 79 vs 51 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun or ZIEX ZE329?

Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun, 75 vs 50 on our dry score.

Which is quieter, ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun or ZIEX ZE329?

Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun, 67 vs 62 on our noise score.

Which is more comfortable, ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun or ZIEX ZE329?

Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun, 62 vs 51 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun or ZIEX ZE329?

Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun, 69 vs 46 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology