Tests 77 · 21 tests Owners 66 · 1,241 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 21 in 2022 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test (straight aquaplaning)
“Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun, very grippy especially in the wet”
Head-to-head
Updated
Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun vs Hankook Ventus Prime 3 K125 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 21 + 14 road tests and 1,241 + 124 owner reviews. How we score
Ventus Prime 3 K125 leads, 76–72 Narrow edge
Add your size for an exact match
/R
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 77 · 14 tests Owners 75 · 124 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 53 in 2021 53 Summer Tyre Braking Test (dry braking)
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
Key facts
- In 6 tests that measured dry braking for both, ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun won 0 and Ventus Prime 3 K125 won 6 (average 95% vs 99% of the best).
- In 6 tests that measured wet braking for both, ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun won 1 and Ventus Prime 3 K125 won 5 (average 94% vs 96% of the best).
- In 5 tests that measured straight aquaplaning for both, ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun won 5 and Ventus Prime 3 K125 won 0 (average 98% vs 95% of the best).
- In 4 tests that measured wet handling for both, ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun won 1 and Ventus Prime 3 K125 won 3 (average 97% vs 98% of the best).
- In 4 tests that measured noise for both, ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun won 1 and Ventus Prime 3 K125 won 3 (average 98% vs 99% of the best).
-
74
Dry
Ventus Prime 3 K125 +1185Why this score
Source ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun Ventus Prime 3 K125 Professional tests (TWG score) · 20 / 12 tests 79 89 Reviews found online 67 79 Dry Braking (% of best) · 6 shared tests · wins 0–6 95% 99% Dry Handling (% of best) · 3 shared tests · wins 0–3 99% 100% Dry Handling (tester's mark) (% of best) · 2 shared tests · wins 0–2 79% 95% ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun: 60% × 79.4 + 40% × 66.7 = 74
Ventus Prime 3 K125: 60% × 88.5 + 40% × 79.3 = 85
-
79
Wet
Ventus Prime 3 K125 +180Why this score
Source ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun Ventus Prime 3 K125 Professional tests (TWG score) · 20 / 12 tests 85 82 Reviews found online 70 77 Straight Aquaplaning (% of best) · 5 shared tests · wins 5–0 98% 95% Wet Handling (tester's mark) (% of best) · 2 shared tests · wins 1–0 75% 70% Wet Braking (% of best) · 6 shared tests · wins 1–5 94% 96% Wet Handling (% of best) · 4 shared tests · wins 1–3 97% 98% ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun: 60% × 85.5 + 40% × 69.7 = 79
Ventus Prime 3 K125: 60% × 81.8 + 40% × 77.2 = 80
-
62
Comfort
Ventus Prime 3 K125 +1274Why this score
Source ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun Ventus Prime 3 K125 Professional tests (TWG score) · 2 / 3 tests 60 76 Reviews found online 63 72 Comfort (tester's mark) (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 0–1 70% 80% ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun: 40% × 60.5 + 60% × 62.8 = 62
Ventus Prime 3 K125: 40% × 75.9 + 60% × 72.4 = 74
-
66
Noise
Ventus Prime 3 K125 +975Why this score
Source ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun Ventus Prime 3 K125 Professional tests (TWG score) · 14 / 6 tests 66 80 Reviews found online ≈ 67 (est.) ≈ 67 (est.) Noise (% of best) · 4 shared tests · wins 1–3 98% 99% ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun: 60% × 66 + 40% × 66.6 (est.) = 66
Ventus Prime 3 K125: 60% × 80.3 + 40% × 66.6 (est.) = 75
No owner ratings of noise for ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun or Ventus Prime 3 K125. The owner half is the owners’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.
-
69
Treadwear
ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun +465Why this score
Source ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun Ventus Prime 3 K125 Professional tests (TWG score) · 6 / 5 tests 73 61 Reviews found online 63 71 Wear (% of best) · 2 shared tests · wins 2–0 81% 66% ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun: 60% × 72.7 + 40% × 63 = 69
Ventus Prime 3 K125: 60% × 61 + 40% × 70.5 = 65
-
66
Handling (owners)
Ventus Prime 3 K125 +975Why this score
Source ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun Ventus Prime 3 K125 Reviews found online 66 75 -
32
Efficiency
Ventus Prime 3 K125 +3466Why this score
Source ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun Ventus Prime 3 K125 Professional tests (TWG score) · 15 / 8 tests 32 66 Rolling Resistance (% of best) · 4 shared tests · wins 0–4 77% 83%
Scores at a glance
| Category | Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun | Hankook Ventus Prime 3 K125 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 72 | 76 |
| Dry | 74 | 85 |
| Wet | 79 | 80 |
| Comfort | 62 | 74 |
| Noise | 66 | 75 |
| Treadwear | 69 | 65 |
| Handling (owners) | 66 | 75 |
| Efficiency | 32 | 66 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
72
/ 100
ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun
76
/ 100
Ventus Prime 3 K125
The professional test results behind the scores
Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.
In the overall rankings of 8 tests that ran both, Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun finished ahead 1 times and Hankook Ventus Prime 3 K125 7 times.
| Discipline | Category | ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun | Ventus Prime 3 K125 | Δ | Head-to-head |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dry Braking | Dry | 95% | 99% | −4.5 | 0–6 in 6 shared tests Newest: 2021 53 Summer Tyre Braking Test · 205/55 R16 |
| Dry Handling | Dry | 99% | 100% | −1.0 | 0–3 in 3 shared tests Newest: 2021 Auto Bild 16 Inch Summer Tyre Test · 205/55 R16 |
| Dry Handling (tester's mark) | Dry | 79% | 95% | −16.0 | 0–2 in 2 shared tests Newest: 2019 AMS Summer SUV Tyre Test · 215/55 R17 |
| Straight Aquaplaning | Wet | 98% | 95% | +2.6 | 5–0 in 5 shared tests Newest: 2021 Auto Bild 16 Inch Summer Tyre Test · 205/55 R16 |
| Wet Braking | Wet | 94% | 96% | −2.2 | 1–5 in 6 shared tests Newest: 2021 53 Summer Tyre Braking Test · 205/55 R16 |
| Wet Handling | Wet | 97% | 98% | −0.8 | 1–3 in 4 shared tests Newest: 2021 Auto Bild 16 Inch Summer Tyre Test · 205/55 R16 |
| Wet Handling (tester's mark) | Wet | 75% | 70% | +5.0 | 1–0 in 2 shared tests Newest: 2019 AMS Summer SUV Tyre Test · 215/55 R17 |
| Comfort (tester's mark) | Comfort | 70% | 80% | −10.0 | 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2019 AMS Summer SUV Tyre Test · 215/55 R17 |
| Noise | Noise | 98% | 99% | −0.7 | 1–3 in 4 shared tests Newest: 2021 Auto Bild 16 Inch Summer Tyre Test · 205/55 R16 |
| Wear | Treadwear | 81% | 66% | +14.9 | 2–0 in 2 shared tests Newest: 2021 Auto Bild 16 Inch Summer Tyre Test · 205/55 R16 |
| Rolling Resistance | Efficiency | 77% | 83% | −6.1 | 0–4 in 4 shared tests Newest: 2021 Auto Bild 16 Inch Summer Tyre Test · 205/55 R16 |
| Also published by the testers (not in the score) | |||||
| Price | Cost | 75% | 84% | −8.7 | 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2018 Auto Bild 15 inch Summer Tyre Test · 195/65 R15 |
| Total Cost of Ownership | Cost | #11/20 | #13/20 | – | 1–1 in 2 shared tests Newest: 2021 Auto Bild 16 Inch Summer Tyre Test · 205/55 R16 |
| Value | Cost | 76% | 65% | +11.3 | 2–0 in 2 shared tests Newest: 2021 Auto Bild 16 Inch Summer Tyre Test · 205/55 R16 |
| Grass Traction | Off-road | 84% #7/12 · 2023 Best SUV Tyres Tested | 99% #2/10 · 2019 SUV 4x4 Summer Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Gravel Handling | Off-road | 99% #7/10 · 2021 All Road SUV Summer Tyre Test | 96% #10/10 · 2019 SUV 4x4 Summer Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Gravel Traction | Off-road | 82% #10/10 · 2021 All Road SUV Summer Tyre Test | 100% #1/10 · 2019 SUV 4x4 Summer Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Mud Traction | Off-road | 88% #7/12 · 2023 Best SUV Tyres Tested | 89% #6/10 · 2019 SUV 4x4 Summer Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Overall Ranking | Overall | #8/53 | #1/53 | – | 1–7 in 8 shared tests Newest: 2021 53 Summer Tyre Braking Test · 205/55 R16 |
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun
Pros
- Exceptionally low road noise and high cabin comfort
- Strong grip and stability in both wet and dry weather conditions
- Outstanding value for money compared to premium brands
Cons
- Some drivers report higher rolling resistance and slightly increased fuel consumption
- Soft sidewalls can lead to vague initial steering response or a less sporty feel during hard cornering
- Occasional complaints of a firmer, harsher ride over bumps depending on vehicle suspension and aspect ratio
Tire B Ventus Prime 3 K125
Pros
- Excellent dry road grip and braking performance
- High value-for-money ratio compared to premium competitors
- Comfortable ride quality with effective vibration absorption
Cons
- Increased risk of hydroplaning as tread depth decreases
- Accelerated tread wear on heavier vehicles or under high-torque conditions
- Noise levels can increase noticeably after several thousand miles
What real owners are saying
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Tire A
Positive
Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun
Community sentiment regarding the Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun is generally positive, with specific praise noted for its strong wet grip. Users frequently evaluate it as an affordable alternative alongside other budget-friendly options for smaller or standard passenger vehicles.
Top themes
#wet weather performance#budget friendly options#tire size availability#grip and handling#eco-run efficiency
Based on 5 community posts
Tire B
Hankook Ventus Prime 3 K125
We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun | B · Hankook Ventus Prime 3 K125 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 86 | 60 |
| Rim diameters | 14″ – 19″ | 15″ – 20″ |
| Sizes in common | 52 | 52 |
Which one should you actually buy?
72
/ 100
Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun
76
/ 100
Hankook Ventus Prime 3 K125
Narrow edge: Hankook Ventus Prime 3 K125 — better efficiency, comfort and dry. Pick the Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun if treadwear matters most to you.
Pick tire B
You want lower fuel or energy use
Hankook Ventus Prime 3 K125 scores 66 vs 32 on efficiency.
Pick tire B
You want the most comfortable ride
Hankook Ventus Prime 3 K125 scores 74 vs 62 on comfort.
Pick tire B
You want the most grip on dry roads
Hankook Ventus Prime 3 K125 scores 85 vs 74 on dry.
Pick tire B
You want a quieter cabin
Hankook Ventus Prime 3 K125 scores 75 vs 66 on noise.
Pick tire A
Your priority is straight aquaplaning
Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun won 5 of 5 shared straight aquaplaning tests.
Tire A · Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun
Tire B · Hankook Ventus Prime 3 K125
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun or Ventus Prime 3 K125?
Which is better in the wet, ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun or Ventus Prime 3 K125?
Neither, by our numbers: 79 vs 80 on the wet score, within 3 points.
Which grips better on dry roads, ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun or Ventus Prime 3 K125?
Hankook Ventus Prime 3 K125, 85 vs 74 on our dry score.
Which is quieter, ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun or Ventus Prime 3 K125?
Hankook Ventus Prime 3 K125, 75 vs 66 on our noise score.
Which is more comfortable, ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun or Ventus Prime 3 K125?
Hankook Ventus Prime 3 K125, 74 vs 62 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun or Ventus Prime 3 K125?
Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun, 69 vs 65 on our treadwear score.
Which rolls more easily, ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun or Ventus Prime 3 K125?
Hankook Ventus Prime 3 K125, 66 vs 32 on our efficiency score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology