Tests 77 · 21 tests Owners 66 · 1,241 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 21 in 2022 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test (straight aquaplaning)
“Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun, very grippy especially in the wet”
Head-to-head
Updated
Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun vs Hankook Ventus ST — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 21 + 1 road tests and 1,241 + 22 owner reviews. How we score
Ventus ST leads, 76–72 Narrow edge
Add your size for an exact match
/R
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
74
Dry
Ventus ST +175Why this score
Source ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun Ventus ST Professional tests (TWG score) · 20 / 1 tests 79 71 Reviews found online 67 82 ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun: 60% × 79.4 + 40% × 66.7 = 74
Ventus ST: 60% × 70.6 + 40% × 82.2 = 75
-
79
Wet
ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun +178Why this score
Source ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun Ventus ST Professional tests (TWG score) · 20 / 1 tests 85 75 Reviews found online 70 82 ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun: 60% × 85.5 + 40% × 69.6 = 79
Ventus ST: 60% × 74.9 + 40% × 82.3 = 78
-
62
Comfort
Ventus ST +1476Why this score
Source ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun Ventus ST Professional tests (TWG score) · 2 / – tests 60 ≈ 71 (est.) Reviews found online 63 79 ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun: 40% × 60.5 + 60% × 62.7 = 62
Ventus ST: 40% × 70.9 (est.) + 60% × 78.8 = 76
No road tests of comfort for Ventus ST. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
66
Noise
Ventus ST +268Why this score
Source ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun Ventus ST Professional tests (TWG score) · 14 / 1 tests 66 69 Reviews found online ≈ 67 (est.) ≈ 67 (est.) ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun: 60% × 66 + 40% × 66.6 (est.) = 66
Ventus ST: 60% × 69 + 40% × 66.6 (est.) = 68
No owner ratings of noise for ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun or Ventus ST. The owner half is the owners’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.
-
69
Treadwear
Ventus ST +877Why this score
Source ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun Ventus ST Professional tests (TWG score) · 6 / – tests 73 ≈ 72 (est.) Reviews found online 63 83 ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun: 60% × 72.7 + 40% × 63 = 69
Ventus ST: 60% × 72.1 (est.) + 40% × 83.4 = 77
No road tests of treadwear for Ventus ST. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).
-
66
Handling (owners)
Ventus ST +1682Why this score
Source ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun Ventus ST Reviews found online 66 82 -
32
Efficiency
Ventus ST +2557Why this score
Source ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun Ventus ST Professional tests (TWG score) · 15 / 1 tests 32 57
Scores at a glance
| Category | Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun | Hankook Ventus ST |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 72 | 76 |
| Dry | 74 | 75 |
| Wet | 79 | 78 |
| Comfort | 62 | 76 |
| Noise | 66 | 68 |
| Treadwear | 69 | 77 |
| Handling (owners) | 66 | 82 |
| Efficiency | 32 | 57 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
72
/ 100
ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun
76
/ 100
Ventus ST
The professional test results behind the scores
Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.
| Discipline | Category | ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun | Ventus ST | Δ | Head-to-head |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dry Braking | Dry | 99% #2/7 · 2025 Motor Low Rolling Resistance (AA) Tyre Test | 95% #2/8 · 2018 All Road 265/60 R18 4x4 Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Dry Handling | Dry | 99% #3/7 · 2025 Motor Low Rolling Resistance (AA) Tyre Test | 98% #5/8 · 2018 All Road 265/60 R18 4x4 Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Straight Aquaplaning | Wet | 97% #3/7 · 2025 Motor Low Rolling Resistance (AA) Tyre Test | 98% #2/8 · 2018 All Road 265/60 R18 4x4 Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Wet Braking | Wet | 93% #4/7 · 2025 Motor Low Rolling Resistance (AA) Tyre Test | 99% #3/8 · 2018 All Road 265/60 R18 4x4 Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Wet Handling | Wet | 98% #4/7 · 2025 Motor Low Rolling Resistance (AA) Tyre Test | 98% #3/8 · 2018 All Road 265/60 R18 4x4 Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Noise | Noise | 98% #5/7 · 2025 Motor Low Rolling Resistance (AA) Tyre Test | 97% #5/8 · 2018 All Road 265/60 R18 4x4 Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Rolling Resistance | Efficiency | 86% #5/7 · 2025 Motor Low Rolling Resistance (AA) Tyre Test | 81% #8/8 · 2018 All Road 265/60 R18 4x4 Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Also published by the testers (not in the score) | |||||
| Price | Cost | 72% #7/16 · 2024 ADAC Summer Tyre Test | 58% #6/8 · 2018 All Road 265/60 R18 4x4 Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Grass Traction | Off-road | 84% #7/12 · 2023 Best SUV Tyres Tested | 100% #1/8 · 2018 All Road 265/60 R18 4x4 Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Gravel Handling | Off-road | 99% #7/10 · 2021 All Road SUV Summer Tyre Test | 99% #4/8 · 2018 All Road 265/60 R18 4x4 Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Gravel Traction | Off-road | 82% #10/10 · 2021 All Road SUV Summer Tyre Test | 100% #1/8 · 2018 All Road 265/60 R18 4x4 Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Mud Traction | Off-road | 88% #7/12 · 2023 Best SUV Tyres Tested | 92% #2/8 · 2018 All Road 265/60 R18 4x4 Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Overall Ranking | Overall | #3/6 2025 Wybór Kierowców Summer Tire Test R16 | #2/8 2018 All Road 265/60 R18 4x4 Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun
Pros
- Exceptionally low road noise and high cabin comfort
- Strong grip and stability in both wet and dry weather conditions
- Outstanding value for money compared to premium brands
Cons
- Some drivers report higher rolling resistance and slightly increased fuel consumption
- Soft sidewalls can lead to vague initial steering response or a less sporty feel during hard cornering
- Occasional complaints of a firmer, harsher ride over bumps depending on vehicle suspension and aspect ratio
Tire B Ventus ST
Pros
- Exceptional tread life and long-lasting durability, often doubling the mileage of competing tires
- Significantly reduced road noise and improved ride comfort compared to factory-fitted premium tires
- Strong dry grip and dependable, predictable wet-weather performance
Cons
- Slightly reduced feedback or a skating sensation in heavy standing water/deep puddles
- Occasional reports of increased road noise as the tires approach the end of their tread life
- Availability can sometimes be limited depending on the region and retailer
What real owners are saying
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Tire A
Positive
Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun
Community sentiment regarding the Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun is generally positive, with specific praise noted for its strong wet grip. Users frequently evaluate it as an affordable alternative alongside other budget-friendly options for smaller or standard passenger vehicles.
Top themes
#wet weather performance#budget friendly options#tire size availability#grip and handling#eco-run efficiency
Based on 5 community posts
Tire B
Hankook Ventus ST
We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun | B · Hankook Ventus ST |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | SUV and 4x4 |
| Sizes available | 86 | 10 |
| Rim diameters | 14″ – 19″ | 17″ – 22″ |
| Sizes in common | 0 | 0 |
Which one should you actually buy?
72
/ 100
Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun
76
/ 100
Hankook Ventus ST
Narrow edge: Hankook Ventus ST — better efficiency, handling and comfort. Where the Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun is ahead, it is by less than 3 points.
Pick tire B
You want lower fuel or energy use
Hankook Ventus ST scores 57 vs 32 on efficiency.
Pick tire B
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Hankook Ventus ST scores 82 vs 66 on handling.
Pick tire B
You want the most comfortable ride
Hankook Ventus ST scores 76 vs 62 on comfort.
Pick tire B
You want the longest tread life
Hankook Ventus ST scores 77 vs 69 on treadwear.
Tire A · Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun
Tire B · Hankook Ventus ST
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun or Ventus ST?
Which is better in the wet, ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun or Ventus ST?
Neither, by our numbers: 79 vs 78 on the wet score, within 3 points.
Which grips better on dry roads, ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun or Ventus ST?
Neither, by our numbers: 74 vs 75 on the dry score, within 3 points.
Which is quieter, ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun or Ventus ST?
Neither, by our numbers: 66 vs 68 on the noise score, within 3 points.
Which is more comfortable, ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun or Ventus ST?
Hankook Ventus ST, 76 vs 62 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun or Ventus ST?
Hankook Ventus ST, 77 vs 69 on our treadwear score.
Which rolls more easily, ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun or Ventus ST?
Hankook Ventus ST, 57 vs 32 on our efficiency score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology