Tests 76 · 21 tests Owners 66 · 1,244 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 21 in 2022 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test (straight aquaplaning)
“Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun, very grippy especially in the wet”
Head-to-head
Updated
Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun vs Kumho Ecsta Sport PS72 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 21 + 8 road tests and 1,244 + 1,068 owner reviews. How we score
Ecsta Sport PS72 is ahead, 80–72
Add your size for an exact match
/R
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 78 · 8 tests Owners 83 · 1,068 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 20 in 2026 Autobild Summer Tyre Test (wet handling (tester's mark))
“I’m on the Kumho sport ps72 and in the dry on road they are great, wet road- great, dry track also great but on wet track; a little unpredictable.”
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
74
Dry
Ecsta Sport PS72 +1286Why this score
Source ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun Ecsta Sport PS72 Professional tests (TWG score) · 20 / 8 tests 79 87 Reviews found online 66 85 ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun: 60% × 79.5 + 40% × 66.4 = 74
Ecsta Sport PS72: 60% × 86.6 + 40% × 85.3 = 86
-
79
Wet
Ecsta Sport PS72 +988Why this score
Source ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun Ecsta Sport PS72 Professional tests (TWG score) · 20 / 8 tests 85 88 Reviews found online 70 88 ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun: 60% × 84.9 + 40% × 69.5 = 79
Ecsta Sport PS72: 60% × 88.1 + 40% × 87.5 = 88
-
61
Comfort
Ecsta Sport PS72 +768Why this score
Source ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun Ecsta Sport PS72 Professional tests (TWG score) · 2 / 5 tests 60 58 Reviews found online 62 75 ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun: 40% × 60 + 60% × 62.3 = 61
Ecsta Sport PS72: 40% × 57.9 + 60% × 75.4 = 68
-
66
Noise
ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun +264Why this score
Source ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun Ecsta Sport PS72 Professional tests (TWG score) · 14 / 7 tests 66 63 Reviews found online ≈ 66 (est.) ≈ 66 (est.) ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun: 60% × 66.1 + 40% × 66.4 (est.) = 66
Ecsta Sport PS72: 60% × 62.5 + 40% × 66.4 (est.) = 64
No owner ratings of noise for ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun or Ecsta Sport PS72. The owner half is the owners’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.
-
69
Treadwear
Ecsta Sport PS72 +473Why this score
Source ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun Ecsta Sport PS72 Professional tests (TWG score) · 6 / 1 tests 72 70 Reviews found online 63 78 ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun: 60% × 72.3 + 40% × 63.2 = 69
Ecsta Sport PS72: 60% × 69.9 + 40% × 78 = 73
-
66
Handling (owners)
Ecsta Sport PS72 +2086Why this score
Source ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun Ecsta Sport PS72 Reviews found online 66 86 -
31
Efficiency
Ecsta Sport PS72 +4071Why this score
Source ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun Ecsta Sport PS72 Professional tests (TWG score) · 15 / 5 tests 31 71
Scores at a glance
| Category | Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun | Kumho Ecsta Sport PS72 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 72 | 80 |
| Dry | 74 | 86 |
| Wet | 79 | 88 |
| Comfort | 61 | 68 |
| Noise | 66 | 64 |
| Treadwear | 69 | 73 |
| Handling (owners) | 66 | 86 |
| Efficiency | 31 | 71 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
72
/ 100
ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun
80
/ 100
Ecsta Sport PS72
The professional test results behind the scores
Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.
| Discipline | Category | ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun | Ecsta Sport PS72 | Δ | Head-to-head |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dry Braking | Dry | 99% #2/7 · 2025 Motor Low Rolling Resistance (AA) Tyre Test | 95% #9/50 · 2026 Summer Braking Super Tyre Test - How do 52 Tyres Perform in Wet and Dry Braking? | – | Different tests |
| Dry Handling | Dry | 99% #3/7 · 2025 Motor Low Rolling Resistance (AA) Tyre Test | 99% #3/4 · 2026 AutoView Value Sport Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Dry Handling (tester's mark) | Dry | 94% #3/7 · 2025 Motor Low Rolling Resistance (AA) Tyre Test | 88% #4/4 · 2026 AutoView Value Sport Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Curved Aquaplaning | Wet | 86% #6/7 · 2025 Motor Low Rolling Resistance (AA) Tyre Test | 94% #5/9 · 2026 Summer SUV Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Straight Aquaplaning | Wet | 97% #3/7 · 2025 Motor Low Rolling Resistance (AA) Tyre Test | 96% #14/20 · 2026 Autobild Summer Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Wet Braking | Wet | 93% #4/7 · 2025 Motor Low Rolling Resistance (AA) Tyre Test | 93% #4/50 · 2026 Summer Braking Super Tyre Test - How do 52 Tyres Perform in Wet and Dry Braking? | – | Different tests |
| Wet Circle | Wet | 98% #4/9 · 2024 AZ Summer Tyre Test | 96% #8/9 · 2026 Summer SUV Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Wet Handling | Wet | 98% #4/7 · 2025 Motor Low Rolling Resistance (AA) Tyre Test | 99% #5/20 · 2026 Autobild Summer Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Wet Handling (tester's mark) | Wet | 70% #8/11 · 2019 AMS Summer SUV Tyre Test | 100% #1/20 · 2026 Autobild Summer Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Comfort (tester's mark) | Comfort | 93% #5/7 · 2025 Motor Low Rolling Resistance (AA) Tyre Test | 97% #3/4 · 2026 AutoView Value Sport Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Noise | Noise | 98% #5/7 · 2025 Motor Low Rolling Resistance (AA) Tyre Test | 100% #1/4 · 2026 AutoView Value Sport Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Abrasion | Treadwear | 67% #8/16 · 2024 ADAC Summer Tyre Test | 70% #11/20 · 2026 Autobild Summer Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Wear | Treadwear | 67% #8/16 · 2024 ADAC Summer Tyre Test | 76% #13/20 · 2026 Autobild Summer Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Rolling Resistance | Efficiency | 86% #5/7 · 2025 Motor Low Rolling Resistance (AA) Tyre Test | 82% #12/20 · 2026 Autobild Summer Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Also published by the testers (not in the score) | |||||
| Total Cost of Ownership | Cost | #13/20 2024 AutoBild Summer Tyre Test | #6/20 2026 Autobild Summer Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Value | Cost | 62% #8/16 · 2024 ADAC Summer Tyre Test | 89% #7/20 · 2026 Autobild Summer Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Grass Traction | Off-road | 84% #7/12 · 2023 Best SUV Tyres Tested | 69% #6/9 · 2026 Summer SUV Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Gravel Handling | Off-road | 99% #7/10 · 2021 All Road SUV Summer Tyre Test | 99% #3/9 · 2026 Summer SUV Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Gravel Traction | Off-road | 82% #10/10 · 2021 All Road SUV Summer Tyre Test | 94% #3/9 · 2026 Summer SUV Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Sand Traction | Off-road | 95% #2/12 · 2023 Best SUV Tyres Tested | 93% #4/9 · 2026 Summer SUV Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Overall Ranking | Overall | #3/6 2025 Wybór Kierowców Summer Tire Test R16 | #7/10 2026 ACE Summer Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun
Pros
- Exceptionally low road noise and high cabin comfort
- Strong grip and stability in both wet and dry weather conditions
- Outstanding value for money compared to premium brands
Cons
- Some drivers report higher rolling resistance and slightly increased fuel consumption
- Soft sidewalls can lead to vague initial steering response or a less sporty feel during hard cornering
- Occasional complaints of a firmer, harsher ride over bumps depending on vehicle suspension and aspect ratio
Tire B Ecsta Sport PS72
Pros
- Exceptional value and significantly lower price point compared to tier-one premium brands
- Strong and predictable grip in both wet and dry conditions
- Quieter road noise and high ride comfort relative to other performance tires
Cons
- Occasional reports of out-of-round tires causing persistent vibrations at highway speeds
- Stiffer sidewalls can result in a firmer ride or slight tracking issues when cold
- Some users noted faster-than-expected wear under aggressive, spirited driving conditions
What real owners are saying
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Tire A
Positive
Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun
Community sentiment regarding the Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun is generally positive, with specific praise noted for its strong wet grip. Users frequently evaluate it as an affordable alternative alongside other budget-friendly options for smaller or standard passenger vehicles.
Top themes
#wet weather performance#budget friendly options#tire size availability#grip and handling#eco-run efficiency
Based on 5 community posts
Tire B
Positive
Kumho Ecsta Sport PS72
Community sentiment toward the Kumho Ecsta Sport PS72 is largely positive, with drivers praising its impressive dry and wet grip, responsive handling, and low cabin noise compared to premium alternatives like the Michelin Pilot Sport series. Most owners view it as an outstanding value proposition, offering near-flagship performance at a significantly lower price point. Minor criticisms focus on potential treadwear longevity, lack of rim protection, mixed feedback on highway noise, and occasional wheel balance or vibration issues.
civicxi.com
·2026-01-19
“Anyone else running these tires? Is it possible the tire(s) out of round? New hypergram wheels/new tires w/ aluminum hubcentric rings. Has vibrations, but most noticed front right. Balanced again same thing. Took the hub rings off with significant decrease but still there. Will try again with plastic rings followed by swapping wheels front to rear. If still going on will have to live with it”
r/elektrischrijden
·1 upvote ·2026-09-02
“Ik heb nog een paar nieuwe banden liggen voor die maat. Continental PremiumContact 7. Had je voor heel weinig mogen hebben. Die zijn echt wel beter dan die Hankooks. Overigens hoeft een goede band niet heel duur te zijn. Ik was zelf niet tevreden mer Hankook. De laatste nieuwe banden die ik heb laten monteren waren Kumho's Ecsta sport PS72. Die zijn weliswaar goedkoop, maar komen uitstekend uit veel testen. Ze hebben ook echt meer grip dan de Hankooks en Vredesteins die ik hiervoor had.”
r/F30
·6 upvotes ·2026-06-07
“Michelin PS5 vs Continental SC 7 vs Kumho PS72 for 437 wheels Looking for new tires for my F30 330i on 437M wheels (225/40R19 & 255/35R19). Main priorities are comfort, steering feel, low noise, and good grip for spirited driving. I’ve previously run Michelin PS5 and loved them, although they got a bit noisy over time. Now I’m deciding between: Michelin PS5 Continental SportContact 7 Kumho PS72 The Kumhos are much cheaper and reviews seem very positive. Are they really close to the PS5/SC7, or is it worth spending more?”
Top themes
#value for money#dry and wet grip#low road noise#Michelin PS4 comparison#balancing and vibration#ride comfort compliance#treadwear longevity
Based on 33 community posts
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun | B · Kumho Ecsta Sport PS72 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 86 | 50 |
| Rim diameters | 14″ – 19″ | 17″ – 21″ |
| Tread depth | — | 9.4/32″ |
| UTQG | — | 320 A A |
| Treadwear warranty | — | 30,000 mi |
| Sidewall | — | Blackwall |
| Max pressure | — | 50 psi |
| Sizes in common | 22 | 22 |
Which one should you actually buy?
72
/ 100
Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun
80
/ 100
Kumho Ecsta Sport PS72
Winner: Kumho Ecsta Sport PS72 — better efficiency, handling and dry. Where the Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun is ahead, it is by less than 3 points.
Pick tire B
You want lower fuel or energy use
Kumho Ecsta Sport PS72 scores 71 vs 31 on efficiency.
Pick tire B
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Kumho Ecsta Sport PS72 scores 86 vs 66 on handling.
Pick tire B
You want the most grip on dry roads
Kumho Ecsta Sport PS72 scores 86 vs 74 on dry.
Pick tire B
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Kumho Ecsta Sport PS72 scores 88 vs 79 on wet.
Tire A · Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun
Tire B · Kumho Ecsta Sport PS72
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun or Ecsta Sport PS72?
Which is better in the wet, ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun or Ecsta Sport PS72?
Kumho Ecsta Sport PS72, 88 vs 79 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun or Ecsta Sport PS72?
Kumho Ecsta Sport PS72, 86 vs 74 on our dry score.
Which is quieter, ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun or Ecsta Sport PS72?
Neither, by our numbers: 66 vs 64 on the noise score, within 3 points.
Which is more comfortable, ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun or Ecsta Sport PS72?
Kumho Ecsta Sport PS72, 68 vs 61 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun or Ecsta Sport PS72?
Kumho Ecsta Sport PS72, 73 vs 69 on our treadwear score.
Which rolls more easily, ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun or Ecsta Sport PS72?
Kumho Ecsta Sport PS72, 71 vs 31 on our efficiency score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology