Tests 76 · 21 tests Owners 68 · 1,241 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 21 in 2022 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test (straight aquaplaning)
“Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun, very grippy especially in the wet”
Toyo Proxes RA1 looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 21 + 0 road tests and 1,241 + 11 owner reviews. How we score
ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun leads, 73–69 Narrow edge
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 76 · 21 tests Owners 68 · 1,241 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 21 in 2022 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test (straight aquaplaning)
“Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun, very grippy especially in the wet”
Tests – · none yet Owners 65 · 11 reviews
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
| Source | ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun | Proxes RA1 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 20 / – tests | 79 | ≈ 72 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 69 | 79 |
ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun: 60% × 79.1 + 40% × 68.5 = 75
Proxes RA1: 60% × 72.1 (est.) + 40% × 78.5 = 75
No road tests of dry for Proxes RA1. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).
| Source | ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun | Proxes RA1 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 20 / – tests | 84 | ≈ 65 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 71 | 61 |
ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun: 60% × 84.4 + 40% × 70.9 = 79
Proxes RA1: 60% × 65 (est.) + 40% × 61.3 = 64
No road tests of wet for Proxes RA1. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).
| Source | ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun | Proxes RA1 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | – | ≈ 58 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | – | 34 |
Proxes RA1: 60% × 58.2 (est.) + 40% × 34.4 = 49
No road tests of snow for Proxes RA1. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).
| Source | ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun | Proxes RA1 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 2 / – tests | 60 | ≈ 69 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 65 | 66 |
ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun: 60% × 60.5 + 40% × 65 = 62
Proxes RA1: 60% × 68.5 (est.) + 40% × 65.7 = 67
No road tests of comfort for Proxes RA1. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
| Source | ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun | Proxes RA1 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 14 / – tests | 66 | ≈ 67 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | ≈ 67 (est.) | 70 |
ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun: 60% × 66 + 40% × 67.3 (est.) = 67
Proxes RA1: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 70.1 = 68
No owner ratings of noise for ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun. The owner half is the owners’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.
No road tests of noise for Proxes RA1. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
| Source | ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun | Proxes RA1 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 6 / – tests | 72 | ≈ 66 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 65 | 68 |
ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun: 60% × 72.1 + 40% × 64.9 = 69
Proxes RA1: 60% × 66.2 (est.) + 40% × 67.6 = 67
No road tests of treadwear for Proxes RA1. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).
| Source | ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun | Proxes RA1 |
|---|---|---|
| Reviews found online | 67 | 73 |
| Category | Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun | Toyo Proxes RA1 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 73 | 69 |
| Dry | 75 | 75 |
| Wet | 79 | 64 |
| Snow | – | 49 |
| Comfort | 62 | 67 |
| Noise | 67 | 68 |
| Treadwear | 69 | 67 |
| Handling (owners) | 67 | 73 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun
Proxes RA1
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Community sentiment regarding the Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun is generally positive, with specific praise noted for its strong wet grip. Users frequently evaluate it as an affordable alternative alongside other budget-friendly options for smaller or standard passenger vehicles.
Based on 5 community posts
We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.
| Attribute | A · Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun | B · Toyo Proxes RA1 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer Trackday and Competition tires |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 86 | 7 |
| Rim diameters | 14″ – 19″ | 15″ – 18″ |
| Tread depth | — | 8/32″ |
| UTQG | — | 100 AA A |
| Sidewall | — | Black Side Wall |
| Max pressure | — | 44 psi |
| Sizes in common | 3 | 3 |
Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun
Toyo Proxes RA1
Narrow edge: Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun — better wet. Pick the Toyo Proxes RA1 if handling and comfort matter most to you. Toyo Proxes RA1 rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 11 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun scores 79 vs 64 on wet.
Toyo Proxes RA1 scores 73 vs 67 on handling.
Toyo Proxes RA1 scores 67 vs 62 on comfort.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun, 79 vs 64 on our wet score.
Neither, by our numbers: 75 vs 75 on the dry score, within 3 points.
Neither, by our numbers: 67 vs 68 on the noise score, within 3 points.
Toyo Proxes RA1, 67 vs 62 on our comfort score.
Neither, by our numbers: 69 vs 67 on the treadwear score, within 3 points.
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology