Head-to-head Updated

Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun vs Toyo Proxes ST — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 21 + 0 road tests and 1,241 + 14 owner reviews. How we score

Too close to call: ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun 73, Proxes ST 72.

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun
Tire AFalken

ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun

Summer

Tests 76 · 21 tests Owners 68 · 1,241 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 21 in 2022 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test (straight aquaplaning)

“Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun, very grippy especially in the wet”

Toyo Proxes ST
Tire BToyo

Proxes ST

All Season

Provisional

Tests – · none yet Owners 73 · 14 reviews

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 75

    Dry

    ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun +3
    72
    Why this score
    SourceZIEX ZE310 EcoRunProxes ST
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 20 / – tests79≈ 71 (est.)
    Reviews found online6975

    ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun: 60% × 79.1 + 40% × 68.5 = 75

    Proxes ST: 60% × 70.5 (est.) + 40% × 74.7 = 72

    No road tests of dry for Proxes ST. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

  2. 79

    Wet

    ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun +4
    75
    Why this score
    SourceZIEX ZE310 EcoRunProxes ST
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 20 / – tests84≈ 74 (est.)
    Reviews found online7177

    ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun: 60% × 84.4 + 40% × 70.9 = 79

    Proxes ST: 60% × 73.6 (est.) + 40% × 76.6 = 75

    No road tests of wet for Proxes ST. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

  3. –

    Snow

    No comparison
    66
    Why this score
    SourceZIEX ZE310 EcoRunProxes ST
    Professional tests (TWG score)–≈ 68 (est.)
    Reviews found online–64

    Proxes ST: 60% × 67.8 (est.) + 40% × 63.6 = 66

    No road tests of snow for Proxes ST. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).

  4. 62

    Comfort

    Proxes ST +10
    72
    Why this score
    SourceZIEX ZE310 EcoRunProxes ST
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 2 / – tests60≈ 70 (est.)
    Reviews found online6574

    ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun: 60% × 60.5 + 40% × 65 = 62

    Proxes ST: 60% × 70 (est.) + 40% × 74.1 = 72

    No road tests of comfort for Proxes ST. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. 67

    Noise

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceZIEX ZE310 EcoRunProxes ST
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 14 / – tests66–
    Reviews found online≈ 67 (est.)–

    ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun: 60% × 66 + 40% × 67.3 (est.) = 67

    No owner ratings of noise for ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun. The owner half is the owners’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.

  6. 69

    Treadwear

    Level
    69
    Why this score
    SourceZIEX ZE310 EcoRunProxes ST
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 6 / – tests72≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online6572

    ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun: 60% × 72.1 + 40% × 64.9 = 69

    Proxes ST: 60% × 67.5 (est.) + 40% × 71.7 = 69

    No road tests of treadwear for Proxes ST. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

  7. 67

    Handling (owners)

    Proxes ST +4
    71
    Why this score
    SourceZIEX ZE310 EcoRunProxes ST
    Reviews found online6771
Scores at a glance
Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun vs Toyo Proxes ST: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryFalken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRunToyo Proxes ST
Relative Score 73 72
Dry 75 72
Wet 79 75
Snow – 66
Comfort 62 72
Noise 67 –
Treadwear 69 69
Handling (owners) 67 71

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score

ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun

Proxes ST

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun

Pros

  • Exceptionally low road noise and high cabin comfort
  • Strong grip and stability in both wet and dry weather conditions
  • Outstanding value for money compared to premium brands

Cons

  • Some drivers report higher rolling resistance and slightly increased fuel consumption
  • Soft sidewalls can lead to vague initial steering response or a less sporty feel during hard cornering
  • Occasional complaints of a firmer, harsher ride over bumps depending on vehicle suspension and aspect ratio
All owner themes in the ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun review

Tire B Proxes ST

Pros

  • Exceptional tread life and long-term durability
  • Quiet and comfortable ride quality compared to other brands and run-flats
  • Strong dry and wet grip with good resistance to aquaplaning

Cons

  • Poor performance and limited traction in snow and ice
  • A small number of users experienced disappointing treadwear and longevity
  • Conflicting feedback regarding wet grip, with isolated reports of poor performance
All owner themes in the Proxes ST review

What real owners are saying

From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score

Tire A

Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun

Positive

Community sentiment regarding the Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun is generally positive, with specific praise noted for its strong wet grip. Users frequently evaluate it as an affordable alternative alongside other budget-friendly options for smaller or standard passenger vehicles.

Top themes
#wet weather performance#budget friendly options#tire size availability#grip and handling#eco-run efficiency

Based on 5 community posts

Tire B

Toyo Proxes ST

We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun B · Toyo Proxes ST
CategorySummerAll Season
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverSUV and 4x4
Sizes available861
Rim diameters14″ – 19″19″

Which one should you actually buy?

Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun

Toyo Proxes ST

Too close to call: Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun and Toyo Proxes ST are within 2 points overall. Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun is stronger on wet and dry. Toyo Proxes ST is stronger on comfort. Toyo Proxes ST rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 14 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire B You want the most comfortable ride

Toyo Proxes ST scores 72 vs 62 on comfort.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun scores 79 vs 75 on wet.

Pick tire A You want the most grip on dry roads

Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun scores 75 vs 72 on dry.

Tire A · Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun
Tire B · Toyo Proxes ST

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun or Proxes ST?

Which is better in the wet, ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun or Proxes ST?

Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun, 79 vs 75 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun or Proxes ST?

Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun, 75 vs 72 on our dry score.

Which is more comfortable, ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun or Proxes ST?

Toyo Proxes ST, 72 vs 62 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun or Proxes ST?

Neither, by our numbers: 69 vs 69 on the treadwear score, within 3 points.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology