Tests 76 · 21 tests Owners 68 · 1,241 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 21 in 2022 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test (straight aquaplaning)
“Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun, very grippy especially in the wet”
Yokohama Geolandar G055 Blue Earth looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.
Head-to-head
Updated
Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun vs Yokohama Geolandar G055 Blue Earth — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 21 + 0 road tests and 1,241 + 12 owner reviews. How we score
ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun is ahead, 73–61
Add your size for an exact match
/R
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 59 · 12 reviews
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
75
Dry
ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun +1461Why this score
Source ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun Geolandar G055 Blue Earth Professional tests (TWG score) · 20 / – tests 79 ≈ 64 (est.) Reviews found online 69 58 ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun: 60% × 79.1 + 40% × 68.5 = 75
Geolandar G055 Blue Earth: 60% × 63.8 (est.) + 40% × 58 = 61
No road tests of dry for Geolandar G055 Blue Earth. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).
-
79
Wet
ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun +2257Why this score
Source ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun Geolandar G055 Blue Earth Professional tests (TWG score) · 20 / – tests 84 ≈ 60 (est.) Reviews found online 71 53 ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun: 60% × 84.4 + 40% × 70.9 = 79
Geolandar G055 Blue Earth: 60% × 60.3 (est.) + 40% × 52.9 = 57
No road tests of wet for Geolandar G055 Blue Earth. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).
-
62
Comfort
Geolandar G055 Blue Earth +365Why this score
Source ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun Geolandar G055 Blue Earth Professional tests (TWG score) · 2 / – tests 60 ≈ 68 (est.) Reviews found online 65 62 ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun: 60% × 60.5 + 40% × 65 = 62
Geolandar G055 Blue Earth: 60% × 67.9 (est.) + 40% × 61.8 = 65
No road tests of comfort for Geolandar G055 Blue Earth. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
67
Noise
No comparison–Why this score
Source ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun Geolandar G055 Blue Earth Professional tests (TWG score) · 14 / – tests 66 – Reviews found online ≈ 67 (est.) – ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun: 60% × 66 + 40% × 67.3 (est.) = 67
No owner ratings of noise for ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun. The owner half is the owners’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.
-
69
Treadwear
ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun +465Why this score
Source ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun Geolandar G055 Blue Earth Professional tests (TWG score) · 6 / – tests 72 ≈ 65 (est.) Reviews found online 65 64 ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun: 60% × 72.1 + 40% × 64.9 = 69
Geolandar G055 Blue Earth: 60% × 65.1 (est.) + 40% × 64 = 65
No road tests of treadwear for Geolandar G055 Blue Earth. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).
-
67
Handling (owners)
ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun +958Why this score
Source ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun Geolandar G055 Blue Earth Reviews found online 67 58
Scores at a glance
| Category | Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun | Yokohama Geolandar G055 Blue Earth |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 73 | 61 |
| Dry | 75 | 61 |
| Wet | 79 | 57 |
| Comfort | 62 | 65 |
| Noise | 67 | – |
| Treadwear | 69 | 65 |
| Handling (owners) | 67 | 58 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
73
/ 100
ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun
61
/ 100
Geolandar G055 Blue Earth
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun
Pros
- Exceptionally low road noise and high cabin comfort
- Strong grip and stability in both wet and dry weather conditions
- Outstanding value for money compared to premium brands
Cons
- Some drivers report higher rolling resistance and slightly increased fuel consumption
- Soft sidewalls can lead to vague initial steering response or a less sporty feel during hard cornering
- Occasional complaints of a firmer, harsher ride over bumps depending on vehicle suspension and aspect ratio
Tire B Geolandar G055 Blue Earth
Pros
- Extremely quiet and comfortable ride quality
- Improved fuel economy and low rolling resistance
- Adequate dry road grip and handling
Cons
- Dangerous or unreliable wet weather traction, particularly lateral grip and cornering
- Prone to wheel spin on damp or wet surfaces
- Accelerated or uneven tread wear reported on certain crossover and SUV models
What real owners are saying
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Tire A
Positive
Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun
Community sentiment regarding the Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun is generally positive, with specific praise noted for its strong wet grip. Users frequently evaluate it as an affordable alternative alongside other budget-friendly options for smaller or standard passenger vehicles.
Top themes
#wet weather performance#budget friendly options#tire size availability#grip and handling#eco-run efficiency
Based on 5 community posts
Tire B
Yokohama Geolandar G055 Blue Earth
We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun | B · Yokohama Geolandar G055 Blue Earth |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | SUV and 4x4 |
| Sizes available | 86 | — |
| Rim diameters | 14″ – 19″ | — |
Which one should you actually buy?
73
/ 100
Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun
61
/ 100
Yokohama Geolandar G055 Blue Earth
Winner: Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun — better wet, dry and handling. Pick the Yokohama Geolandar G055 Blue Earth if comfort matters most to you. Yokohama Geolandar G055 Blue Earth rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 12 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Pick tire A
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun scores 79 vs 57 on wet.
Pick tire A
You want the most grip on dry roads
Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun scores 75 vs 61 on dry.
Pick tire A
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun scores 67 vs 58 on handling.
Pick tire A
You want the longest tread life
Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun scores 69 vs 65 on treadwear.
Tire A · Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun
Tire B · Yokohama Geolandar G055 Blue Earth
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun or Geolandar G055 Blue Earth?
Which is better in the wet, ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun or Geolandar G055 Blue Earth?
Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun, 79 vs 57 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun or Geolandar G055 Blue Earth?
Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun, 75 vs 61 on our dry score.
Which is more comfortable, ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun or Geolandar G055 Blue Earth?
Yokohama Geolandar G055 Blue Earth, 65 vs 62 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun or Geolandar G055 Blue Earth?
Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun, 69 vs 65 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology