tirewheelguide
Head-to-head Updated

Falken ZIEX ZE320 vs Hankook Ventus Prime 4 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 7 + 13 road tests and 131 + 2,512 owner reviews. How we score

ZIEX ZE320 is ahead, 82–75

Check price on Amazon · ZIEX ZE320 or Ventus Prime 4 on Amazon
Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Falken ZIEX ZE320
Tire AFalken

ZIEX ZE320

Summer

± 6

Tests 84 · 7 tests Owners 81 · 131 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 20 in 2025 Auto Bild Summer Performance Tyre Test (wet handling)

Hankook Ventus Prime 4
Tire BHankook

Ventus Prime 4

Summer

± 4

Tests 78 · 13 tests Owners 71 · 2,512 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 21 in 2022 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test (dry handling)

“Simbolul cu mașina și fulgerul de pe Hankook Ventus Prime 4 arată că anvelopa e compatibilă și cu mașini electrice (EV), nu că e destinată exclusiv lor. Poate fi folosită fără probleme și pe mașini cu motor termic.”

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

Key facts

  • In 3 tests that measured straight aquaplaning for both, ZIEX ZE320 won 2 and Ventus Prime 4 won 1 (average 97% vs 93% of the best).
  1. 90

    Dry

    ZIEX ZE320 +10
    80
    Why this score
    SourceZIEX ZE320Ventus Prime 4
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 7 / 11 tests9484
    Reviews found online8473
    Dry Braking (% of best) · 2 shared tests · wins 2–0100%94%
    Dry Handling (tester's mark) (% of best) · 2 shared tests · wins 1–095%93%

    ZIEX ZE320: 60% × 94.3 + 40% × 83.9 = 90

    Ventus Prime 4: 60% × 84.3 + 40% × 73 = 80

  2. 86

    Wet

    ZIEX ZE320 +8
    78
    Why this score
    SourceZIEX ZE320Ventus Prime 4
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 7 / 12 tests8780
    Reviews found online8575
    Straight Aquaplaning (% of best) · 3 shared tests · wins 2–197%93%
    Wet Handling (tester's mark) (% of best) · 2 shared tests · wins 1–185%87%
    Wet Braking (% of best) · 2 shared tests · wins 2–094%87%
    Wet Braking (concrete) (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 1–086%77%
    Wet Handling (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 0–196%98%

    ZIEX ZE320: 60% × 86.6 + 40% × 84.7 = 86

    Ventus Prime 4: 60% × 80.2 + 40% × 74.5 = 78

  3. 81

    Comfort

    ZIEX ZE320 +12
    69
    Why this score
    SourceZIEX ZE320Ventus Prime 4
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 3 / 1 tests8570
    Reviews found online7868
    Comfort (tester's mark) (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 1–096%95%

    ZIEX ZE320: 40% × 85.2 + 60% × 77.7 = 81

    Ventus Prime 4: 40% × 70.3 + 60% × 67.6 = 69

  4. 76

    Noise

    ZIEX ZE320 +15
    61
    Why this score
    SourceZIEX ZE320Ventus Prime 4
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 5 / 8 tests8258
    Reviews found online≈ 67 (est.)≈ 67 (est.)
    Noise (tester's mark) (% of best) · 2 shared tests · wins 1–195%86%

    ZIEX ZE320: 60% × 81.9 + 40% × 66.5 (est.) = 76

    Ventus Prime 4: 60% × 57.6 + 40% × 66.5 (est.) = 61

    No owner ratings of noise for ZIEX ZE320 or Ventus Prime 4. The owner half is the owners’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.

  5. 71

    Treadwear

    Ventus Prime 4 +3
    74
    Why this score
    SourceZIEX ZE320Ventus Prime 4
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 2 / 5 tests7078
    Reviews found online7467
    Abrasion (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 1–076%72%
    Wear (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 0–165%77%

    ZIEX ZE320: 60% × 69.8 + 40% × 74 = 71

    Ventus Prime 4: 60% × 78.2 + 40% × 66.9 = 74

  6. 83

    Handling (owners)

    ZIEX ZE320 +11
    72
    Why this score
    SourceZIEX ZE320Ventus Prime 4
    Reviews found online8372
  7. 67

    Efficiency

    Ventus Prime 4 +16
    83
    Why this score
    SourceZIEX ZE320Ventus Prime 4
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 5 / 8 tests6783
    Fuel Consumption (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 0–196%100%
    Rolling Resistance (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 0–095%95%
Scores at a glance
CategoryFalken ZIEX ZE320Hankook Ventus Prime 4
Relative Score 82 75
Dry 90 80
Wet 86 78
Comfort 81 69
Noise 76 61
Treadwear 71 74
Handling (owners) 83 72
Efficiency 67 83

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
± 6

ZIEX ZE320

± 4

Ventus Prime 4

The professional test results behind the scores

Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.

In the overall rankings of 3 tests that ran both, Falken ZIEX ZE320 finished ahead 2 times and Hankook Ventus Prime 4 1 times.

DisciplineCategoryZIEX ZE320Ventus Prime 4ΔHead-to-head
Dry Braking Dry 100% 94% +5.6 2–0 in 2 shared tests Newest: 2026 ADAC Summer Tyre Test · 225/50R17
Dry Handling (tester's mark) Dry 95% 93% +2.5 1–0 in 2 shared tests Newest: 2025 Summer and All Season Combined Tyre Test · 225/45 R17
Straight Aquaplaning Wet 97% 93% +3.1 2–1 in 3 shared tests Newest: 2026 ADAC Summer Tyre Test · 225/50R17
Wet Braking Wet 94% 87% +6.7 2–0 in 2 shared tests Newest: 2026 ADAC Summer Tyre Test · 225/50R17
Wet Braking (concrete) Wet 86% 77% +9.0 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2026 ADAC Summer Tyre Test · 225/50R17
Wet Handling Wet 96% 98% −1.9 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2025 Summer and All Season Combined Tyre Test · 225/45 R17
Wet Handling (tester's mark) Wet 85% 87% −2.3 1–1 in 2 shared tests Newest: 2025 Summer and All Season Combined Tyre Test · 225/45 R17
Comfort (tester's mark) Comfort 96% 95% +1.2 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2025 Die ReifenTester Summer Touring Tyre Test · 205/55 R17
Noise (tester's mark) Noise 95% 86% +8.8 1–1 in 2 shared tests Newest: 2025 Summer and All Season Combined Tyre Test · 225/45 R17
Abrasion Treadwear 76% 72% +4.1 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2026 ADAC Summer Tyre Test · 225/50R17
Wear Treadwear 65% 77% −12.4 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2026 ADAC Summer Tyre Test · 225/50R17
Fuel Consumption Efficiency 96% 100% −3.6 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2026 ADAC Summer Tyre Test · 225/50R17
Rolling Resistance Efficiency 95% 95% 0.0 0–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2025 Summer and All Season Combined Tyre Test · 225/45 R17
Also published by the testers (not in the score)
Overall Ranking Overall #5/16 #11/16 – 2–1 in 3 shared tests Newest: 2026 ADAC Summer Tyre Test · 225/50R17

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A ZIEX ZE320

Pros

  • Exceptional ride comfort and smooth absorption of road imperfections
  • Significantly lower noise levels compared to predecessor or competing brands
  • Strong and confident grip in both wet and dry conditions

Cons

  • Noticeably worse fuel efficiency/consumption reported by some users
  • Performance drop and unexpected oversteer under very high asphalt temperatures (40-70°C)
  • Potential for rapid tread wear on specific vehicle applications
All owner themes in the ZIEX ZE320 review

Tire B Ventus Prime 4

Pros

  • Exceptional wet and dry grip providing high confidence
  • Significantly reduced road noise and smooth, quiet ride quality
  • Competitively priced offering great value compared to top-tier premium brands

Cons

  • Accelerated tread wear reported by some users, leading to shorter overall tire life
  • Noticeable decrease in wet traction and grip as the tread wears down past the halfway mark
  • Stiffer sidewalls can translate to a firmer ride or reduced comfort on rough surfaces
All owner themes in the Ventus Prime 4 review

What real owners are saying

From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score

Tire A

Falken ZIEX ZE320

We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.

Tire B

Hankook Ventus Prime 4

Positive

Community opinion on the Hankook Ventus Prime 4 is largely positive, with drivers viewing it as a comfortable, quiet, and capable touring tire. Users frequently praise its strong dry and wet performance alongside its compelling price-to-performance ratio compared to premium alternatives like Michelin. Some uncertainties exist regarding long-term tread wear and slight fuel economy impacts, but owners generally report satisfactory everyday reliability.

forums.hardwarezone.com.sg ·3 upvotes ·2024-10-08

“Tried it out on 205/55R16 Grip wise, feels like similar grip level as previous Tyres. Quite good on dry, quick lane switch wun feel the Tyre wall lembeh over. Dry brake is good. Haven't test wet perf much yet. Noise, is abit similar to previous Tyre, maybe just slightly noiser. Comfort wise, is on the comfy side. FC wise, slightly worse than previous Tyre. Good replacement for economic call I feel from price per overall offering perspective Those who want a comfy n quiet ride, can consider this Tyre”
r/TireQuestions ·1 upvote ·2026-10-09

“Found a cut on one of my tires, is it 100% cooked? Three month old Hankook Ventus Prime 4 and I found a cut/split. It’s holding air fine but it is cooked?”
r/AutomobileRO ·2 upvotes ·2025-03-23

“Simbolul cu mașina și fulgerul de pe Hankook Ventus Prime 4 arată că anvelopa e compatibilă și cu mașini electrice (EV), nu că e destinată exclusiv lor. Poate fi folosită fără probleme și pe mașini cu motor termic.”
Top themes
#value for money#comfort and low noise#wet and dry grip#comparison with premium brands#tread longevity questions#touring versus sports handling

Based on 41 community posts

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Falken ZIEX ZE320 B · Hankook Ventus Prime 4
CategorySummerSummer
Sizes available3366
Rim diameters15″ – 18″15″ – 20″
Sizes in common2929

Which one should you actually buy?

Falken ZIEX ZE320

Hankook Ventus Prime 4

Winner: Falken ZIEX ZE320 — better noise, comfort and handling. Pick the Hankook Ventus Prime 4 if efficiency and treadwear matter most to you.

Pick tire B You want lower fuel or energy use

Hankook Ventus Prime 4 scores 83 vs 67 on efficiency.

Pick tire A You want a quieter cabin

Falken ZIEX ZE320 scores 76 vs 61 on noise.

Pick tire A You want the most comfortable ride

Falken ZIEX ZE320 scores 81 vs 69 on comfort.

Pick tire A You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Falken ZIEX ZE320 scores 83 vs 72 on handling.

Tire A · Falken ZIEX ZE320
Check price on Amazon
Tire B · Hankook Ventus Prime 4
Check price on Amazon

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

ZIEX ZE320 or Ventus Prime 4?

Which is better in the wet, ZIEX ZE320 or Ventus Prime 4?

Falken ZIEX ZE320, 86 vs 78 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, ZIEX ZE320 or Ventus Prime 4?

Falken ZIEX ZE320, 90 vs 80 on our dry score.

Which is quieter, ZIEX ZE320 or Ventus Prime 4?

Falken ZIEX ZE320, 76 vs 61 on our noise score.

Which is more comfortable, ZIEX ZE320 or Ventus Prime 4?

Falken ZIEX ZE320, 81 vs 69 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, ZIEX ZE320 or Ventus Prime 4?

Hankook Ventus Prime 4, 74 vs 71 on our treadwear score.

Which rolls more easily, ZIEX ZE320 or Ventus Prime 4?

Hankook Ventus Prime 4, 83 vs 67 on our efficiency score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology