Tests – · none yet Owners 41 · 23 reviews
Falken ZIEX ZE329 looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.
Falken ZIEX ZE329 vs Toyo Proxes TR1 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 0 + 1 road tests and 23 + 900 owner reviews. How we score
Proxes TR1 is ahead, 64–50
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 62 · 1 test Owners 66 · 900 reviews
Best test result: #3 of 6 in 2024 TopTireReview Best UHP Tyres for Asia Test (subj. comfort)
“Avoid TR1.. the sound will become unbearable.. I suggest Yokohama ES32..”
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
50
Dry
Proxes TR1 +959Why this score
Source ZIEX ZE329 Proxes TR1 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests ≈ 56 (est.) 53 Reviews found online 40 68 ZIEX ZE329: 60% × 56.4 (est.) + 40% × 39.6 = 50
Proxes TR1: 60% × 52.9 + 40% × 68.3 = 59
No road tests of dry for ZIEX ZE329. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).
-
51
Wet
Proxes TR1 +1667Why this score
Source ZIEX ZE329 Proxes TR1 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests ≈ 56 (est.) 66 Reviews found online 45 68 ZIEX ZE329: 60% × 55.8 (est.) + 40% × 44.8 = 51
Proxes TR1: 60% × 66.5 + 40% × 68 = 67
No road tests of wet for ZIEX ZE329. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).
-
57
Snow
No comparison–Why this score
Source ZIEX ZE329 Proxes TR1 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 63 (est.) – Reviews found online 48 – ZIEX ZE329: 60% × 62.5 (est.) + 40% × 47.7 = 57
No road tests of snow for ZIEX ZE329. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).
-
51
Comfort
Proxes TR1 +1465Why this score
Source ZIEX ZE329 Proxes TR1 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests ≈ 63 (est.) 68 Reviews found online 34 60 ZIEX ZE329: 60% × 63 (est.) + 40% × 33.7 = 51
Proxes TR1: 60% × 68.2 + 40% × 60.1 = 65
No road tests of comfort for ZIEX ZE329. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
62
Noise
Proxes TR1 +668Why this score
Source ZIEX ZE329 Proxes TR1 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests ≈ 67 (est.) 68 Reviews found online 53 ≈ 67 (est.) ZIEX ZE329: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 53.2 = 62
Proxes TR1: 60% × 68.2 + 40% × 67.3 (est.) = 68
No road tests of noise for ZIEX ZE329. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
No owner ratings of noise for Proxes TR1. The owner half is the owners’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.
-
46
Treadwear
Proxes TR1 +1763Why this score
Source ZIEX ZE329 Proxes TR1 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 55 (est.) ≈ 64 (est.) Reviews found online 32 61 ZIEX ZE329: 60% × 55.3 (est.) + 40% × 32 = 46
Proxes TR1: 60% × 64.3 (est.) + 40% × 61.4 = 63
No road tests of treadwear for ZIEX ZE329. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).
No road tests of treadwear for Proxes TR1. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).
-
41
Handling (owners)
Proxes TR1 +2970Why this score
Source ZIEX ZE329 Proxes TR1 Reviews found online 41 70
Scores at a glance
| Category | Falken ZIEX ZE329 | Toyo Proxes TR1 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 50 | 64 |
| Dry | 50 | 59 |
| Wet | 51 | 67 |
| Snow | 57 | – |
| Comfort | 51 | 65 |
| Noise | 62 | 68 |
| Treadwear | 46 | 63 |
| Handling (owners) | 41 | 70 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
ZIEX ZE329
Proxes TR1
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A ZIEX ZE329
Pros
- Affordable price point offering great value
- Good traction and grip on dry pavement
- Balanced overall performance for everyday commuting
Cons
- Rapid and premature tread wear, falling short of expected mileage
- Poor wet and winter weather traction, described as dangerous in snow
- Excessive road noise and highway hum reported by multiple users
Tire B Proxes TR1
Pros
- Exceptional dry grip and responsive steering feedback
- High value-for-money proposition compared to premium tier-one brands
- Attractive and aggressive directional tread design
Cons
- Noticeable road noise and humming sounds at certain speeds
- Soft sidewalls that can cause a slight squirm or delayed initial steering response
- Rapid tread wear, particularly under aggressive driving or on rear axles
What real owners are saying
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Falken ZIEX ZE329
We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.
Toyo Proxes TR1
Community sentiment regarding the Toyo Proxes TR1 is mixed, with users frequently noting an attractive price point and smooth, comfortable ride when compared to factory tires or run-flats. However, multiple drivers report shortcomings in wet-weather performance, cold grip, and road noise as mileage increases, while several criticize its soft sidewalls for creating imprecise handling at the limit.
“I had these exact tyres on my ep3, and they were brilliant compared what the car came with from factory. I can’t remember what they were, but for me , they just didn’t feel right…when I went t for these TR1’s , it felt like cars dynamics completely changed for the better. But my driving was mainly city/motorways and sometimes b-roads. And now I’m reminiscing about my type-r days…”
“Avoid TR1.. the sound will become unbearable.. I suggest Yokohama ES32..”
“Quote: Originally Posted by gamisou 70l46 did you get yours mounted and balanced for that price? I picked mine up at tiredealsforless.com for $765.12 shipped. They had the best prices that I have seen. Yep, $859 is mounted/balanced and 6% Michigan sales tax. Got them from Tireman, a Ohio/Michigan tire retailer & service center.”
Based on 36 community posts
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Falken ZIEX ZE329 | B · Toyo Proxes TR1 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All-Season | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | — | 61 |
| Rim diameters | — | 14″ – 20″ |
| Tread depth | 6/32″ | — |
| UTQG | 480 A A | — |
| Treadwear warranty | 60,000 mi | — |
| Sidewall | Blackwall | — |
| Max pressure | 51 psi | — |
Which one should you actually buy?
Falken ZIEX ZE329
Toyo Proxes TR1
Winner: Toyo Proxes TR1 — better handling, treadwear and wet. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Toyo Proxes TR1 scores 70 vs 41 on handling.
Toyo Proxes TR1 scores 63 vs 46 on treadwear.
Toyo Proxes TR1 scores 67 vs 51 on wet.
Toyo Proxes TR1 scores 65 vs 51 on comfort.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
ZIEX ZE329 or Proxes TR1?
Which is better in the wet, ZIEX ZE329 or Proxes TR1?
Toyo Proxes TR1, 67 vs 51 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, ZIEX ZE329 or Proxes TR1?
Toyo Proxes TR1, 59 vs 50 on our dry score.
Which is quieter, ZIEX ZE329 or Proxes TR1?
Toyo Proxes TR1, 68 vs 62 on our noise score.
Which is more comfortable, ZIEX ZE329 or Proxes TR1?
Toyo Proxes TR1, 65 vs 51 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, ZIEX ZE329 or Proxes TR1?
Toyo Proxes TR1, 63 vs 46 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology