Falken ZIEX ZE329 looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.

Head-to-head Updated

Falken ZIEX ZE329 vs Yokohama ADVAN Neova AD08R — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 0 + 2 road tests and 23 + 46 owner reviews. How we score

ADVAN Neova AD08R is ahead, 68–51

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Falken ZIEX ZE329
Tire AFalken

ZIEX ZE329

All-Season

Tests – · none yet Owners 41 · 23 reviews

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 50

    Dry

    ADVAN Neova AD08R +25
    75
    Why this score
    SourceZIEX ZE329ADVAN Neova AD08R
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 2 tests≈ 56 (est.)70
    Reviews found online4083

    ZIEX ZE329: 60% × 56.4 (est.) + 40% × 39.6 = 50

    ADVAN Neova AD08R: 60% × 70.3 + 40% × 83.1 = 75

    No road tests of dry for ZIEX ZE329. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

  2. 51

    Wet

    ADVAN Neova AD08R +18
    69
    Why this score
    SourceZIEX ZE329ADVAN Neova AD08R
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 2 tests≈ 56 (est.)67
    Reviews found online4571

    ZIEX ZE329: 60% × 55.8 (est.) + 40% × 44.8 = 51

    ADVAN Neova AD08R: 60% × 67.1 + 40% × 71.3 = 69

    No road tests of wet for ZIEX ZE329. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

  3. 57

    Snow

    ZIEX ZE329 +6
    51
    Why this score
    SourceZIEX ZE329ADVAN Neova AD08R
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 63 (est.)≈ 59 (est.)
    Reviews found online4838

    ZIEX ZE329: 60% × 62.5 (est.) + 40% × 47.7 = 57

    ADVAN Neova AD08R: 60% × 59.5 (est.) + 40% × 38.4 = 51

    No road tests of snow for ZIEX ZE329. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).

    No road tests of snow for ADVAN Neova AD08R. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).

  4. 51

    Comfort

    ADVAN Neova AD08R +17
    68
    Why this score
    SourceZIEX ZE329ADVAN Neova AD08R
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 63 (est.)≈ 69 (est.)
    Reviews found online3466

    ZIEX ZE329: 60% × 63 (est.) + 40% × 33.7 = 51

    ADVAN Neova AD08R: 60% × 68.6 (est.) + 40% × 65.9 = 68

    No road tests of comfort for ZIEX ZE329 or ADVAN Neova AD08R. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. 62

    Noise

    ADVAN Neova AD08R +6
    68
    Why this score
    SourceZIEX ZE329ADVAN Neova AD08R
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 67 (est.)≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online5368

    ZIEX ZE329: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 53.2 = 62

    ADVAN Neova AD08R: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 68.3 = 68

    No road tests of noise for ZIEX ZE329 or ADVAN Neova AD08R. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 46

    Treadwear

    ADVAN Neova AD08R +18
    64
    Why this score
    SourceZIEX ZE329ADVAN Neova AD08R
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 55 (est.)≈ 65 (est.)
    Reviews found online3263

    ZIEX ZE329: 60% × 55.3 (est.) + 40% × 32 = 46

    ADVAN Neova AD08R: 60% × 64.8 (est.) + 40% × 63.1 = 64

    No road tests of treadwear for ZIEX ZE329. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

    No road tests of treadwear for ADVAN Neova AD08R. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

  7. 41

    Handling (owners)

    ADVAN Neova AD08R +40
    81
    Why this score
    SourceZIEX ZE329ADVAN Neova AD08R
    Reviews found online4181
Scores at a glance
Falken ZIEX ZE329 vs Yokohama ADVAN Neova AD08R: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryFalken ZIEX ZE329Yokohama ADVAN Neova AD08R
Relative Score 51 68
Dry 50 75
Wet 51 69
Snow 57 51
Comfort 51 68
Noise 62 68
Treadwear 46 64
Handling (owners) 41 81

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score

ZIEX ZE329

ADVAN Neova AD08R

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A ZIEX ZE329

Pros

  • Affordable price point offering great value
  • Good traction and grip on dry pavement
  • Balanced overall performance for everyday commuting

Cons

  • Rapid and premature tread wear, falling short of expected mileage
  • Poor wet and winter weather traction, described as dangerous in snow
  • Excessive road noise and highway hum reported by multiple users
All owner themes in the ZIEX ZE329 review

Tire B ADVAN Neova AD08R

Pros

  • Unbeatable dry grip and track performance
  • Razor-sharp steering response and exceptional road feedback
  • Stiff sidewalls providing precise turn-in and cornering stability

Cons

  • High tire noise that can worsen significantly as the tire ages
  • Stiff ride quality and compromised overall comfort
  • Prone to aquaplaning and reduced traction in standing water or heavy rain
All owner themes in the ADVAN Neova AD08R review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Falken ZIEX ZE329 B · Yokohama ADVAN Neova AD08R
CategoryAll-SeasonSummer
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Tread depth6/32″9/32″
UTQG480 A A200 A A
Treadwear warranty60,000 mi—
SidewallBlackwallBlackwall
Max pressure51 psi51 psi

Which one should you actually buy?

Falken ZIEX ZE329

Yokohama ADVAN Neova AD08R

Winner: Yokohama ADVAN Neova AD08R — better handling, dry and wet. Pick the Falken ZIEX ZE329 if snow matters most to you.

Pick tire B You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Yokohama ADVAN Neova AD08R scores 81 vs 41 on handling.

Pick tire B You want the most grip on dry roads

Yokohama ADVAN Neova AD08R scores 75 vs 50 on dry.

Pick tire B Your priority is wet-weather safety

Yokohama ADVAN Neova AD08R scores 69 vs 51 on wet.

Pick tire B You want the longest tread life

Yokohama ADVAN Neova AD08R scores 64 vs 46 on treadwear.

Tire A · Falken ZIEX ZE329
Tire B · Yokohama ADVAN Neova AD08R

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

ZIEX ZE329 or ADVAN Neova AD08R?

Which is better in the wet, ZIEX ZE329 or ADVAN Neova AD08R?

Yokohama ADVAN Neova AD08R, 69 vs 51 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, ZIEX ZE329 or ADVAN Neova AD08R?

Yokohama ADVAN Neova AD08R, 75 vs 50 on our dry score.

Which is better in snow, ZIEX ZE329 or ADVAN Neova AD08R?

Falken ZIEX ZE329, 57 vs 51 on our snow score.

Which is quieter, ZIEX ZE329 or ADVAN Neova AD08R?

Yokohama ADVAN Neova AD08R, 68 vs 62 on our noise score.

Which is more comfortable, ZIEX ZE329 or ADVAN Neova AD08R?

Yokohama ADVAN Neova AD08R, 68 vs 51 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, ZIEX ZE329 or ADVAN Neova AD08R?

Yokohama ADVAN Neova AD08R, 64 vs 46 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology