tirewheelguide
Head-to-head Updated

Falken ZIEX ZE914 EcoRun vs Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 1 + 0 road tests and 630 + 60 owner reviews. How we score

BluEarth Es ES32 leads, 71–67 Narrow edge

Check price on Amazon · BluEarth Es ES32 or ZIEX ZE914 EcoRun on Amazon
Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Falken ZIEX ZE914 EcoRun
Tire AFalken

ZIEX ZE914 EcoRun

Summer

± 7

Tests 71 · 1 test Owners 61 · 630 reviews

Best test result: #2 of 20 in 2020 Auto Zeitung Summer Tyre Test (straight aquaplaning)

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 66

    Dry

    BluEarth Es ES32 +4
    70
    Why this score
    SourceZIEX ZE914 EcoRunBluEarth Es ES32
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests68≈ 69 (est.)
    Reviews found online6471

    ZIEX ZE914 EcoRun: 60% × 67.5 + 40% × 63.7 = 66

    BluEarth Es ES32: 60% × 69.5 (est.) + 40% × 71.4 = 70

    No road tests of dry for BluEarth Es ES32. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).

  2. 72

    Wet

    BluEarth Es ES32 +2
    74
    Why this score
    SourceZIEX ZE914 EcoRunBluEarth Es ES32
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests77≈ 73 (est.)
    Reviews found online6575

    ZIEX ZE914 EcoRun: 60% × 76.5 + 40% × 64.8 = 72

    BluEarth Es ES32: 60% × 73 (est.) + 40% × 74.8 = 74

    No road tests of wet for BluEarth Es ES32. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. 55

    Snow

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceZIEX ZE914 EcoRunBluEarth Es ES32
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 61 (est.)–
    Reviews found online46–

    ZIEX ZE914 EcoRun: 60% × 61.5 (est.) + 40% × 45.9 = 55

    No road tests of snow for ZIEX ZE914 EcoRun. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).

  4. 64

    Comfort

    BluEarth Es ES32 +9
    73
    Why this score
    SourceZIEX ZE914 EcoRunBluEarth Es ES32
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests73≈ 70 (est.)
    Reviews found online5975

    ZIEX ZE914 EcoRun: 40% × 72.5 + 60% × 59.1 = 64

    BluEarth Es ES32: 40% × 70.1 (est.) + 60% × 74.7 = 73

    No road tests of comfort for BluEarth Es ES32. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. 61

    Noise

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceZIEX ZE914 EcoRunBluEarth Es ES32
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests64–
    Reviews found online57–

    ZIEX ZE914 EcoRun: 60% × 64 + 40% × 57 = 61

  6. 63

    Treadwear

    BluEarth Es ES32 +2
    65
    Why this score
    SourceZIEX ZE914 EcoRunBluEarth Es ES32
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 64 (est.)≈ 66 (est.)
    Reviews found online6265

    ZIEX ZE914 EcoRun: 60% × 64.5 (est.) + 40% × 61.5 = 63

    BluEarth Es ES32: 60% × 65.6 (est.) + 40% × 64.6 = 65

    No road tests of treadwear for ZIEX ZE914 EcoRun. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).

    No road tests of treadwear for BluEarth Es ES32. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).

  7. 67

    Handling (owners)

    BluEarth Es ES32 +8
    75
    Why this score
    SourceZIEX ZE914 EcoRunBluEarth Es ES32
    Reviews found online6775
  8. 64

    Efficiency

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceZIEX ZE914 EcoRunBluEarth Es ES32
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests64–
Scores at a glance
CategoryFalken ZIEX ZE914 EcoRunYokohama BluEarth Es ES32
Relative Score 67 71
Dry 66 70
Wet 72 74
Snow 55 –
Comfort 64 73
Noise 61 –
Treadwear 63 65
Handling (owners) 67 75
Efficiency 64 –

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Recomputed
Headline score
± 7

ZIEX ZE914 EcoRun

± 8

BluEarth Es ES32

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A ZIEX ZE914 EcoRun

Pros

  • Exceptional value for money compared to premium brands
  • Strong and predictable wet and dry traction
  • Stiff sidewalls providing crisp steering response and good road feedback

Cons

  • Increased road noise or droning, particularly on coarse asphalt or as the tire wears
  • Stiffer ride quality and harshness over bumps due to fortified sidewalls
  • Wet grip performance dropping noticeably as the tread wears down
All owner themes in the ZIEX ZE914 EcoRun review

Tire B BluEarth Es ES32

Pros

  • Exceptional ride comfort and noise reduction
  • Strong value proposition compared to premium brands
  • Reliable dry-weather traction and handling

Cons

  • Wet-weather grip can become unpredictable as tread depth decreases
  • Inconsistent tread life, with some users reporting premature wear
  • Sidewalls may be susceptible to damage from severe potholes
All owner themes in the BluEarth Es ES32 review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Falken ZIEX ZE914 EcoRun B · Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32
CategorySummerSummer
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available1764
Rim diameters14″ – 18″13″ – 18″
Tread depth9/32″—
UTQG320 A A—
SidewallBlackwall—
Max pressure51 psi—
Sizes in common1212

Which one should you actually buy?

Falken ZIEX ZE914 EcoRun

Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32

Narrow edge: Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 — better comfort, handling and dry. It leads or ties in every category we score.

Pick tire B You want the most comfortable ride

Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 scores 73 vs 64 on comfort.

Pick tire B You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 scores 75 vs 67 on handling.

Pick tire B You want the most grip on dry roads

Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 scores 70 vs 66 on dry.

Tire A · Falken ZIEX ZE914 EcoRun
Check price on Amazon
Tire B · Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32
Check price on Amazon

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

ZIEX ZE914 EcoRun or BluEarth Es ES32?

Which is better in the wet, ZIEX ZE914 EcoRun or BluEarth Es ES32?

Neither, by our numbers: 72 vs 74 on the wet score, within 3 points.

Which grips better on dry roads, ZIEX ZE914 EcoRun or BluEarth Es ES32?

Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32, 70 vs 66 on our dry score.

Which is more comfortable, ZIEX ZE914 EcoRun or BluEarth Es ES32?

Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32, 73 vs 64 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, ZIEX ZE914 EcoRun or BluEarth Es ES32?

Neither, by our numbers: 63 vs 65 on the treadwear score, within 3 points.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology