Tests – · none yet Owners 77 · 3 reviews
Head-to-head
Updated
Falken Ziez ZE950 AS vs Hankook Winter i*pike RS2 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): 60% professional tests, 40% owner reviews.
Ziez ZE950 AS leads, 75–71 Narrow edge
Add your size for an exact match
/R
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 66 · 5 tests Owners 76 · 5 reviews
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
76
Dry
Ziez ZE950 AS +1759Why this score
Source Ziez ZE950 AS Winter i*pike RS2 Professional tests (TWG score) – 49 Reviews found online 81 74 -
76
Wet
Ziez ZE950 AS +274Why this score
Source Ziez ZE950 AS Winter i*pike RS2 Professional tests (TWG score) – 71 Reviews found online 78 78 -
77
Snow
Ziez ZE950 AS +176Why this score
Source Ziez ZE950 AS Winter i*pike RS2 Professional tests (TWG score) – 76 Reviews found online 81 77 -
75
Comfort
Winter i*pike RS2 +378Why this score
Source Ziez ZE950 AS Winter i*pike RS2 Professional tests (TWG score) – 81 Reviews found online 81 75 -
–
Noise
No comparison60Why this score
Source Ziez ZE950 AS Winter i*pike RS2 Professional tests (TWG score) – 55 -
67
Treadwear
Winter i*pike RS2 +471Why this score
Source Ziez ZE950 AS Winter i*pike RS2 Reviews found online 69 75 -
80
Handling
Ziez ZE950 AS +179Why this score
Source Ziez ZE950 AS Winter i*pike RS2 Reviews found online 80 79
Scores at a glance
| Category | Falken Ziez ZE950 AS | Hankook Winter i*pike RS2 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 75 | 71 |
| Dry | 76 | 59 |
| Wet | 76 | 74 |
| Snow | 77 | 76 |
| Comfort | 75 | 78 |
| Noise | – | 60 |
| Treadwear | 67 | 71 |
| Handling | 80 | 79 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Less important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Less important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neither tire has a score here yet, so this weight changes nothing.
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
75
/ 100
Ziez ZE950 AS
71
/ 100
Winter i*pike RS2
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Ziez ZE950 AS
Pros
- Excellent value for the price point
- Smooth and comfortable ride quality
- Low road noise levels
Cons
- Limited tread life warranty compared to some competitors
- Potential trade-off between handling performance and longevity
Tire B Winter i*pike RS2
Pros
- Exceptional traction and braking on snow and ice
- Strong side grip and predictable cornering limits
- High durability with secure stud retention over multiple years
Cons
- Poor steering feedback on dry tarmac
- Noticeable understeer in dry road conditions
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Falken Ziez ZE950 AS | B · Hankook Winter i*pike RS2 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All Season High Performance tires | Winter |
| Vehicle type | — | Passenger Car / Crossover |
Which one should you actually buy?
75
/ 100
Falken Ziez ZE950 AS
71
/ 100
Hankook Winter i*pike RS2
Winner: Falken Ziez ZE950 AS — better dry. Pick the Hankook Winter i*pike RS2 if treadwear and comfort matter most to you.
Pick tire A
You want the most grip on dry roads
Falken Ziez ZE950 AS scores 76 vs 59 on dry.
Pick tire B
You want the longest tread life
Hankook Winter i*pike RS2 scores 71 vs 67 on treadwear.
Pick tire B
You want the most comfortable ride
Hankook Winter i*pike RS2 scores 78 vs 75 on comfort.
Tire A · Falken Ziez ZE950 AS
Tire B · Hankook Winter i*pike RS2
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.