Tests – · none yet Owners 68 · 80 reviews
Firestone Destination A/T vs Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 80 + 186 owner reviews. How we score
DynaPro A/TM RF10 leads, 71–68 Narrow edge
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 73 · 186 reviews
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
67
Dry
DynaPro A/TM RF10 +673Why this score
Source Destination A/T DynaPro A/TM RF10 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 68 (est.) ≈ 71 (est.) Reviews found online 67 77 Destination A/T: 60% × 67.6 (est.) + 40% × 67.3 = 67
DynaPro A/TM RF10: 60% × 71.3 (est.) + 40% × 76.6 = 73
No road tests of dry for Destination A/T. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).
No road tests of dry for DynaPro A/TM RF10. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).
-
70
Wet
DynaPro A/TM RF10 +474Why this score
Source Destination A/T DynaPro A/TM RF10 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 70 (est.) ≈ 73 (est.) Reviews found online 70 75 Destination A/T: 60% × 69.8 (est.) + 40% × 69.8 = 70
DynaPro A/TM RF10: 60% × 72.8 (est.) + 40% × 75.2 = 74
No road tests of wet for Destination A/T. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).
No road tests of wet for DynaPro A/TM RF10. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).
-
69
Snow
Destination A/T +465Why this score
Source Destination A/T DynaPro A/TM RF10 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 69 (est.) ≈ 67 (est.) Reviews found online 68 62 Destination A/T: 60% × 69.4 (est.) + 40% × 68.3 = 69
DynaPro A/TM RF10: 60% × 67.1 (est.) + 40% × 61.6 = 65
No road tests of snow for Destination A/T. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).
No road tests of snow for DynaPro A/TM RF10. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).
-
68
Comfort
DynaPro A/TM RF10 +472Why this score
Source Destination A/T DynaPro A/TM RF10 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 69 (est.) ≈ 70 (est.) Reviews found online 67 75 Destination A/T: 60% × 68.8 (est.) + 40% × 67.1 = 68
DynaPro A/TM RF10: 60% × 70.2 (est.) + 40% × 75.4 = 72
No road tests of comfort for Destination A/T or DynaPro A/TM RF10. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
69
Noise
DynaPro A/TM RF10 +170Why this score
Source Destination A/T DynaPro A/TM RF10 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 67 (est.) ≈ 67 (est.) Reviews found online 71 73 Destination A/T: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 70.9 = 69
DynaPro A/TM RF10: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 72.9 = 70
No road tests of noise for Destination A/T or DynaPro A/TM RF10. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
67
Treadwear
DynaPro A/TM RF10 +471Why this score
Source Destination A/T DynaPro A/TM RF10 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 66 (est.) ≈ 69 (est.) Reviews found online 68 75 Destination A/T: 60% × 66.4 (est.) + 40% × 68.3 = 67
DynaPro A/TM RF10: 60% × 68.6 (est.) + 40% × 75.3 = 71
No road tests of treadwear for Destination A/T. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).
No road tests of treadwear for DynaPro A/TM RF10. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).
-
65
Handling (owners)
DynaPro A/TM RF10 +671Why this score
Source Destination A/T DynaPro A/TM RF10 Reviews found online 65 71
Scores at a glance
| Category | Firestone Destination A/T | Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 68 | 71 |
| Dry | 67 | 73 |
| Wet | 70 | 74 |
| Snow | 69 | 65 |
| Comfort | 68 | 72 |
| Noise | 69 | 70 |
| Treadwear | 67 | 71 |
| Handling (owners) | 65 | 71 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Destination A/T
DynaPro A/TM RF10
The professional test results behind the scores
Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.
In the overall rankings of 1 tests that ran both, Firestone Destination A/T finished ahead 1 times and Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10 0 times.
| Discipline | Category | Destination A/T | DynaPro A/TM RF10 | Δ | Head-to-head |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Also published by the testers (not in the score) | |||||
| Overall Ranking | Overall | #8/13 | #14/13 | – | 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2018 SA4x4 All-Terrain Tire Test R17 · 265/65R17 |
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Destination A/T
Pros
- Exceptional ride comfort and low road noise for an all-terrain tire
- Strong value proposition with competitive pricing
- Reliable traction in diverse conditions including snow, sand, and wet pavement
Cons
- Noticeable decline in wet-weather traction as tread depth wears down
- Tendency to hydroplane in deep standing water
- Limited performance in deep, thick mud compared to more aggressive mud-terrain tires
Tire B DynaPro A/TM RF10
Pros
- Exceptional tread life and durability
- Low road noise compared to other all-terrain tires
- Strong value proposition and competitive pricing
Cons
- Inconsistent traction on wet pavement and ice
- Reports of sidewall vulnerability to punctures
- Potential for increased fuel consumption
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Firestone Destination A/T | B · Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All Season All Terrain and Off Road tires | All-Terrain tire |
| Vehicle type | SUV and 4x4 | SUV and 4x4 |
| Sizes available | 2 | 29 |
| Rim diameters | 16″ – 17″ | 15″ – 20″ |
| Tread depth | 14/32″ | 13/32″ |
| UTQG | 460 A B | 560 A B |
| Treadwear warranty | — | 50,000 mi |
| Sidewall | Outlined White Lettering | Outlined White Lettering |
| Max pressure | 50 psi | 44 psi |
Which one should you actually buy?
Firestone Destination A/T
Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10
Narrow edge: Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10 — better dry, handling and wet. Pick the Firestone Destination A/T if snow matters most to you.
Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10 scores 73 vs 67 on dry.
Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10 scores 71 vs 65 on handling.
Firestone Destination A/T scores 69 vs 65 on snow.
Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10 scores 74 vs 70 on wet.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Destination A/T or DynaPro A/TM RF10?
Which is better in the wet, Destination A/T or DynaPro A/TM RF10?
Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10, 74 vs 70 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, Destination A/T or DynaPro A/TM RF10?
Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10, 73 vs 67 on our dry score.
Which is better in snow, Destination A/T or DynaPro A/TM RF10?
Firestone Destination A/T, 69 vs 65 on our snow score.
Which is quieter, Destination A/T or DynaPro A/TM RF10?
Neither, by our numbers: 69 vs 70 on the noise score, within 3 points.
Which is more comfortable, Destination A/T or DynaPro A/TM RF10?
Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10, 72 vs 68 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, Destination A/T or DynaPro A/TM RF10?
Hankook DynaPro A/TM RF10, 71 vs 67 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology