Tests – · none yet Owners 69 · 80 reviews
Head-to-head
Updated
Firestone Destination A/T vs Yokohama Geolandar A/T G015 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 2 road tests and 80 + 1,633 owner reviews. How we score
Geolandar A/T G015 is ahead, 74–69
Add your size for an exact match
/R
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 73 · 2 tests Owners 77 · 1,633 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 8 in 2018 Auto Bild SUV All Season Tyre Test (noise)
“I put the G015 ’s on y wife’s 2020 this spring but in 225/65r17. Saved the stock wheels for snow tires . No complaints with the tires . They are super quiet. Handle fine.”
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
68
Dry
Geolandar A/T G015 +775Why this score
Source Destination A/T Geolandar A/T G015 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests ≈ 68 (est.) 74 Reviews found online 67 77 Destination A/T: 60% × 67.7 (est.) + 40% × 67.2 = 68
Geolandar A/T G015: 60% × 73.6 + 40% × 77.1 = 75
No road tests of dry for Destination A/T. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).
-
71
Wet
Geolandar A/T G015 +273Why this score
Source Destination A/T Geolandar A/T G015 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests ≈ 71 (est.) 69 Reviews found online 72 80 Destination A/T: 60% × 71.3 (est.) + 40% × 71.7 = 71
Geolandar A/T G015: 60% × 68.9 + 40% × 79.6 = 73
No road tests of wet for Destination A/T. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
70
Snow
Geolandar A/T G015 +575Why this score
Source Destination A/T Geolandar A/T G015 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests ≈ 70 (est.) 77 Reviews found online 70 73 Destination A/T: 60% × 70.3 (est.) + 40% × 69.5 = 70
Geolandar A/T G015: 60% × 76.6 + 40% × 73.4 = 75
No road tests of snow for Destination A/T. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).
-
67
Comfort
Geolandar A/T G015 +875Why this score
Source Destination A/T Geolandar A/T G015 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 69 (est.) ≈ 71 (est.) Reviews found online 66 77 Destination A/T: 40% × 68.6 (est.) + 60% × 66.3 = 67
Geolandar A/T G015: 40% × 70.6 (est.) + 60% × 77.4 = 75
No road tests of comfort for Destination A/T or Geolandar A/T G015. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
68
Noise
Geolandar A/T G015 +977Why this score
Source Destination A/T Geolandar A/T G015 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests ≈ 67 (est.) 76 Reviews found online 71 78 Destination A/T: 60% × 66.6 (est.) + 40% × 70.7 = 68
Geolandar A/T G015: 60% × 75.8 + 40% × 77.8 = 77
No road tests of noise for Destination A/T. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
67
Treadwear
Geolandar A/T G015 +572Why this score
Source Destination A/T Geolandar A/T G015 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 67 (est.) ≈ 70 (est.) Reviews found online 68 76 Destination A/T: 60% × 66.6 (est.) + 40% × 67.5 = 67
Geolandar A/T G015: 60% × 69.5 (est.) + 40% × 75.8 = 72
No road tests of treadwear for Destination A/T. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).
No road tests of treadwear for Geolandar A/T G015. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).
-
64
Handling (owners)
Geolandar A/T G015 +1074Why this score
Source Destination A/T Geolandar A/T G015 Reviews found online 64 74 -
–
Efficiency
No comparison57Why this score
Source Destination A/T Geolandar A/T G015 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests – 57
Scores at a glance
| Category | Firestone Destination A/T | Yokohama Geolandar A/T G015 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 69 | 74 |
| Dry | 68 | 75 |
| Wet | 71 | 73 |
| Snow | 70 | 75 |
| Comfort | 67 | 75 |
| Noise | 68 | 77 |
| Treadwear | 67 | 72 |
| Handling (owners) | 64 | 74 |
| Efficiency | – | 57 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Recomputed
Headline score
69
/ 100
Destination A/T
74
/ 100
Geolandar A/T G015
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
The professional test results behind the scores
Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.
In the overall rankings of 1 tests that ran both, Firestone Destination A/T finished ahead 1 times and Yokohama Geolandar A/T G015 0 times.
| Discipline | Category | Destination A/T | Geolandar A/T G015 | Δ | Head-to-head |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Also published by the testers (not in the score) | |||||
| Overall Ranking | Overall | #8/13 | #16/13 | – | 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2018 SA4x4 All-Terrain Tire Test R17 · 265/65R17 |
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Destination A/T
Pros
- Exceptional ride comfort and low road noise for an all-terrain tire
- Strong value proposition with competitive pricing
- Reliable traction in diverse conditions including snow, sand, and wet pavement
Cons
- Noticeable decline in wet-weather traction as tread depth wears down
- Tendency to hydroplane in deep standing water
- Limited performance in deep, thick mud compared to more aggressive mud-terrain tires
Tire B Geolandar A/T G015
Pros
- Exceptional wet-weather and rain traction
- Low road noise and smooth highway ride quality
- Strong performance in light snow and winter conditions (3PMSF rated)
Cons
- Struggles in deep, sticky mud and wet clay
- Some reports of faster tread wear or hardening rubber compound over time
- Softer sidewalls on certain specs can result in a slightly floaty or numb steering feel under heavy loads
What real owners are saying
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Tire A
Firestone Destination A/T
We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.
Tire B
Positive
Yokohama Geolandar A/T G015
Community sentiment toward the Yokohama Geolandar A/T G015 is predominantly positive, with owners highlighting its quiet highway manners, strong snow and wet traction, and good light off-road capability. Criticisms primarily center around a slight 1–2 mpg fuel economy loss, potential ride harshness or softer P-rated sidewalls depending on vehicle application, and gravel retention in the tread. Many drivers consider it a balanced all-terrain tire suited for predominantly on-road daily driving with occasional trail use.
ramforum.com
·2016-06-01
“I may up the pressure to your suggestion - I'm running the door jamb recommended 39 PSI all around. I pick up little pebbles in the tread all day, every day, I notice. I have noticed a ~2 mpg loss on fuel economy, which really adds a lot to the "price" of the tires. Are you seeing any worse MPGs?”
r/RangerRaptor
·3 upvotes ·2024-10-19
“Changing tires (General Grabber AT3 vs Yokohama Geolandar A/T G015) Halloo I am about to pick my RR next month from the dealer and I am thinking if it is a good idea to change tires. Here is the context: I am buying the RR because I always wanted to drive a truck and I love American cars in general (I also have Mustang s197 V8). In fact I want to switch from Wrangler Sahara, which is a great car BTW, however after 4 years and only 20.000 miles I know I miss more comfort. The rest of my family even more ;-) 95% of my trips is on reagular roads, city cruising. Sometimes some rural paths (no heavy offroading). My Wrangler came with Duelers, which I replaced with Yokohama A/T G015. The difference was night and day as far as wet and cold. Here in POLAND we have two seasons: it is either hot and wet or cold and wet. Winter in my area is pretty light, however I go to the mountains once a year. So the question is: As I do not know how General Grabber AT3 works, but I trust Yokohoma G015, is the change the tires worth it?”
r/XVcrosstrek
·3 upvotes ·2019-02-13
“GEOLANDAR A/T G015 Anyone running these on 17" rims, stock or other? I have Enkei M52 rims, 17x7.5 and 45mm offset. What size fits without rubbing? 215/60R17 looks to be the closest, the only other size close is 225/65R17 which I think will be too big without a lift. I am open to other suggestions for off-road capable tires that will mainly be used on-road. K02 is out because they don't fit without rubbing, and I plan to add flaps at some point and do not want to lift the vehicle or get different rims.”
Top themes
#Snow and winter traction#Highway road noise#Fuel economy impact#Ride comfort and sidewall stiffness#Off-road and trail capability#Sizing and fitment rubbing
Based on 30 community posts
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Firestone Destination A/T | B · Yokohama Geolandar A/T G015 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All Season All Terrain and Off Road tires | All-Terrain tire |
| Vehicle type | SUV and 4x4 | SUV and 4x4 |
| Sizes available | 2 | 90 |
| Rim diameters | 16″ – 17″ | 15″ – 22″ |
| Tread depth | 14/32″ | 11 - 18/32″ |
| UTQG | 460 A B | 360 - 600 A B |
| Sidewall | Outlined White Lettering | Black Side Wall - Raised Outline White Lettering |
| Max pressure | 50 psi | 35 - 80 psi |
Which one should you actually buy?
69
/ 100
Firestone Destination A/T
74
/ 100
Yokohama Geolandar A/T G015
Winner: Yokohama Geolandar A/T G015 — better handling, noise and comfort. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Pick tire B
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Yokohama Geolandar A/T G015 scores 74 vs 64 on handling.
Pick tire B
You want a quieter cabin
Yokohama Geolandar A/T G015 scores 77 vs 68 on noise.
Pick tire B
You want the most comfortable ride
Yokohama Geolandar A/T G015 scores 75 vs 67 on comfort.
Pick tire B
You want the most grip on dry roads
Yokohama Geolandar A/T G015 scores 75 vs 68 on dry.
Tire A · Firestone Destination A/T
Tire B · Yokohama Geolandar A/T G015
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Destination A/T or Geolandar A/T G015?
Which is better in the wet, Destination A/T or Geolandar A/T G015?
Neither, by our numbers: 71 vs 73 on the wet score, within 3 points.
Which grips better on dry roads, Destination A/T or Geolandar A/T G015?
Yokohama Geolandar A/T G015, 75 vs 68 on our dry score.
Which is better in snow, Destination A/T or Geolandar A/T G015?
Yokohama Geolandar A/T G015, 75 vs 70 on our snow score.
Which is quieter, Destination A/T or Geolandar A/T G015?
Yokohama Geolandar A/T G015, 77 vs 68 on our noise score.
Which is more comfortable, Destination A/T or Geolandar A/T G015?
Yokohama Geolandar A/T G015, 75 vs 67 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, Destination A/T or Geolandar A/T G015?
Yokohama Geolandar A/T G015, 72 vs 67 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology