Head-to-head Updated

Firestone Destination A/T2 vs Hankook Dynapro HP — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 1 + 0 road tests and 9 + 7 owner reviews. How we score

Destination A/T2 is ahead, 72–64

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Firestone Destination A/T2
Tire AFirestone

Destination A/T2

All-Terrain tire

Provisional

Tests – · 1 test Owners 73 · 9 reviews

Best test result: #5 of 18 in 2022 Consumer Reports All Terrain Truck Tires (tested tread life (miles))

Hankook Dynapro HP
Tire BHankook

Dynapro HP

Summer

Provisional

Tests – · none yet Owners 63 · 7 reviews

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 70

    Dry

    Destination A/T2 +8
    62
    Why this score
    SourceDestination A/T2Dynapro HP
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 69 (est.)≈ 64 (est.)
    Reviews found online7159

    Destination A/T2: 60% × 69.2 (est.) + 40% × 71.3 = 70

    Dynapro HP: 60% × 64.2 (est.) + 40% × 59 = 62

    No road tests of dry for Destination A/T2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

    No road tests of dry for Dynapro HP. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

  2. 76

    Wet

    Destination A/T2 +8
    68
    Why this score
    SourceDestination A/T2Dynapro HP
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 74 (est.)≈ 68 (est.)
    Reviews found online7867

    Destination A/T2: 60% × 74.4 (est.) + 40% × 78 = 76

    Dynapro HP: 60% × 68.1 (est.) + 40% × 66.7 = 68

    No road tests of wet for Destination A/T2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

    No road tests of wet for Dynapro HP. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

  3. 72

    Snow

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceDestination A/T2Dynapro HP
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 71 (est.)–
    Reviews found online73–

    Destination A/T2: 60% × 71 (est.) + 40% × 73.4 = 72

    No road tests of snow for Destination A/T2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).

  4. 72

    Comfort

    Destination A/T2 +7
    65
    Why this score
    SourceDestination A/T2Dynapro HP
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 70 (est.)≈ 68 (est.)
    Reviews found online7561

    Destination A/T2: 60% × 70.1 (est.) + 40% × 74.7 = 72

    Dynapro HP: 60% × 67.7 (est.) + 40% × 60.7 = 65

    No road tests of comfort for Destination A/T2 or Dynapro HP. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. 71

    Noise

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceDestination A/T2Dynapro HP
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 67 (est.)–
    Reviews found online76–

    Destination A/T2: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 75.7 = 71

    No road tests of noise for Destination A/T2. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 70

    Treadwear

    Destination A/T2 +5
    65
    Why this score
    SourceDestination A/T2Dynapro HP
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests71≈ 65 (est.)
    Reviews found online6965

    Destination A/T2: 60% × 70.9 + 40% × 69.2 = 70

    Dynapro HP: 60% × 65.3 (est.) + 40% × 64.7 = 65

    No road tests of treadwear for Dynapro HP. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

  7. 73

    Handling (owners)

    Destination A/T2 +16
    57
    Why this score
    SourceDestination A/T2Dynapro HP
    Reviews found online7357
Scores at a glance
Firestone Destination A/T2 vs Hankook Dynapro HP: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryFirestone Destination A/T2Hankook Dynapro HP
Relative Score 72 64
Dry 70 62
Wet 76 68
Snow 72 –
Comfort 72 65
Noise 71 –
Treadwear 70 65
Handling (owners) 73 57

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Destination A/T2

Dynapro HP

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Destination A/T2

Pros

  • Exceptional wet weather traction and grip
  • Strong performance in snow with 3PMS rating
  • Quiet and smooth ride quality at highway speeds

Cons

  • Vague or unresponsive steering feedback
  • Questionable durability on sharp rocks or rough forest service roads
  • Stiffer ride compared to factory street tires
All owner themes in the Destination A/T2 review

Tire B Dynapro HP

Pros

  • Impressive long-term durability and high mileage potential (up to 68,000 miles reported)
  • Stable performance for motorway travel and holiday towing under normal conditions
  • Consistent and even wear reported over extended periods (e.g., 40,000 km)

Cons

  • Extreme and premature front tire degradation, including uneven wear and a melted appearance at very low mileage
  • Lack of traction on soft or slippery surfaces like wet grass
  • Reduced performance and confidence when towing heavier loads such as a caravan
All owner themes in the Dynapro HP review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Firestone Destination A/T2 B · Hankook Dynapro HP
CategoryAll-Terrain tireSummer
Vehicle typeSUV and 4x4SUV and 4x4
Sizes available3314
Rim diameters15″ – 22″16″ – 18″
Tread depth10 - 12/32″—
UTQG540 - 560 A B—
Treadwear warranty55,000 mi—
SidewallBlack Side Wall - Raised Outline White Lettering—
Max pressure44 - 50 psi—
Sizes in common66

Which one should you actually buy?

Firestone Destination A/T2

Hankook Dynapro HP

Winner: Firestone Destination A/T2 — better handling, dry and wet. It leads or ties in every category we score. Firestone Destination A/T2 rests on little evidence so far (1 test, 9 reviews), so read this result as provisional. Hankook Dynapro HP rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 7 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire A You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Firestone Destination A/T2 scores 73 vs 57 on handling.

Pick tire A You want the most grip on dry roads

Firestone Destination A/T2 scores 70 vs 62 on dry.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

Firestone Destination A/T2 scores 76 vs 68 on wet.

Pick tire A You want the most comfortable ride

Firestone Destination A/T2 scores 72 vs 65 on comfort.

Tire A · Firestone Destination A/T2
Tire B · Hankook Dynapro HP

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Destination A/T2 or Dynapro HP?

Which is better in the wet, Destination A/T2 or Dynapro HP?

Firestone Destination A/T2, 76 vs 68 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, Destination A/T2 or Dynapro HP?

Firestone Destination A/T2, 70 vs 62 on our dry score.

Which is more comfortable, Destination A/T2 or Dynapro HP?

Firestone Destination A/T2, 72 vs 65 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, Destination A/T2 or Dynapro HP?

Firestone Destination A/T2, 70 vs 65 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology