tirewheelguide
Head-to-head Updated

Firestone Destination HP vs Yokohama Geolandar H/T G056 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 2 + 35 owner reviews. How we score

Check price on Amazon · Destination HP Check price on Amazon · Geolandar H/T G056
Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Firestone Destination HP
Tire AFirestone

Destination HP

Summer Premium Touring tires

Tests – · none yet Owners – · 2 reviews (needs 5)

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. –

    Dry

    No comparison
    72
    Why this score
    SourceDestination HPGeolandar H/T G056
    Professional tests (TWG score)–≈ 70 (est.)
    Reviews found online–74

    Geolandar H/T G056: 60% × 70.5 (est.) + 40% × 73.8 = 72

    No road tests of dry for Geolandar H/T G056. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).

  2. –

    Wet

    No comparison
    70
    Why this score
    SourceDestination HPGeolandar H/T G056
    Professional tests (TWG score)–≈ 71 (est.)
    Reviews found online–70

    Geolandar H/T G056: 60% × 70.5 (est.) + 40% × 70.3 = 70

    No road tests of wet for Geolandar H/T G056. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. –

    Snow

    No comparison
    58
    Why this score
    SourceDestination HPGeolandar H/T G056
    Professional tests (TWG score)–≈ 63 (est.)
    Reviews found online–50

    Geolandar H/T G056: 60% × 63.1 (est.) + 40% × 50.4 = 58

    No road tests of snow for Geolandar H/T G056. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).

  4. –

    Comfort

    No comparison
    69
    Why this score
    SourceDestination HPGeolandar H/T G056
    Professional tests (TWG score)–≈ 69 (est.)
    Reviews found online–69

    Geolandar H/T G056: 40% × 69.2 (est.) + 60% × 69.3 = 69

    No road tests of comfort for Geolandar H/T G056. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. –

    Noise

    No comparison
    69
    Why this score
    SourceDestination HPGeolandar H/T G056
    Professional tests (TWG score)–≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online–72

    Geolandar H/T G056: 60% × 66.6 (est.) + 40% × 72.1 = 69

    No road tests of noise for Geolandar H/T G056. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. –

    Treadwear

    No comparison
    64
    Why this score
    SourceDestination HPGeolandar H/T G056
    Professional tests (TWG score)–≈ 65 (est.)
    Reviews found online–63

    Geolandar H/T G056: 60% × 64.9 (est.) + 40% × 62.7 = 64

    No road tests of treadwear for Geolandar H/T G056. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).

  7. –

    Handling (owners)

    No comparison
    69
    Why this score
    SourceDestination HPGeolandar H/T G056
    Reviews found online–69
Scores at a glance
CategoryFirestone Destination HPYokohama Geolandar H/T G056
Relative Score – 68
Dry – 72
Wet – 70
Snow – 58
Comfort – 69
Noise – 69
Treadwear – 64
Handling (owners) – 69

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Destination HP

± 7

Geolandar H/T G056

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Destination HP

Pros

  • Exceptional traction in diverse off-road conditions including sand, mud, and grass
  • Strong performance while towing heavy loads
  • Reliable handling across varied terrain and bitumen surfaces

Cons

  • Rapid or uneven tread wear on the outer edges
  • Potential for soft compound degradation under specific driving patterns
  • Inconsistent longevity compared to premium alternatives
All owner themes in the Destination HP review

Tire B Geolandar H/T G056

Pros

  • Excellent ride comfort and low road noise
  • Strong dry pavement handling and stability
  • Impressive tread longevity for many users

Cons

  • Inconsistent performance in wet and snowy conditions
  • Reports of premature tread wear in heavy-duty or high-torque applications
  • Occasional complaints regarding road noise or 'growling' sounds as the tire ages
All owner themes in the Geolandar H/T G056 review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Firestone Destination HP B · Yokohama Geolandar H/T G056
CategorySummer Premium Touring tiresAll Season
Vehicle typeSUV and 4x4SUV and 4x4
Sizes available2256
Rim diameters15″ – 20″15″ – 22″
Tread depth—11/32″
UTQG—720 A A
Treadwear warranty—70,000 mi
Sidewall—Blackwall
Max pressure—51 psi
Sizes in common77

Which one should you actually buy?

Firestone Destination HP

Yokohama Geolandar H/T G056

Only Yokohama Geolandar H/T G056 has enough test and review data for a Relative Score, so there is no head-to-head winner yet.

Tire A · Firestone Destination HP
Check price on Amazon
Tire B · Yokohama Geolandar H/T G056
Check price on Amazon

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology