tirewheelguide
Head-to-head Updated

Firestone Destination HP vs Nexen N Fera Primus — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 7 road tests and 2 + 11 owner reviews. How we score

Check price on Amazon · Destination HP Check price on Amazon · N Fera Primus
Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Firestone Destination HP
Tire AFirestone

Destination HP

Summer Premium Touring tires

Tests – · none yet Owners – · 2 reviews (needs 5)

Nexen N Fera Primus
Tire BNexen

N Fera Primus

Summer

± 6

Tests 62 · 7 tests Owners 79 · 11 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 10 in 2026 Vi Bilagare Summer Tyre Test (straight aquaplaning)

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. –

    Dry

    No comparison
    75
    Why this score
    SourceDestination HPN Fera Primus
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 7 tests–73
    Reviews found online–78

    N Fera Primus: 60% × 73.3 + 40% × 77.9 = 75

  2. –

    Wet

    No comparison
    85
    Why this score
    SourceDestination HPN Fera Primus
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 7 tests–86
    Reviews found online–84

    N Fera Primus: 60% × 86.3 + 40% × 83.5 = 85

  3. –

    Comfort

    No comparison
    57
    Why this score
    SourceDestination HPN Fera Primus
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests–32
    Reviews found online–74

    N Fera Primus: 40% × 32.2 + 60% × 73.9 = 57

  4. –

    Noise

    No comparison
    65
    Why this score
    SourceDestination HPN Fera Primus
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 4 tests–64
    Reviews found online–≈ 67 (est.)

    N Fera Primus: 60% × 64.3 + 40% × 66.6 (est.) = 65

    No owner ratings of noise for N Fera Primus. The owner half is the owners’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.

  5. –

    Treadwear

    No comparison
    50
    Why this score
    SourceDestination HPN Fera Primus
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 4 tests–33
    Reviews found online–77

    N Fera Primus: 60% × 32.9 + 40% × 76.7 = 50

  6. –

    Handling (owners)

    No comparison
    75
    Why this score
    SourceDestination HPN Fera Primus
    Reviews found online–75
  7. –

    Efficiency

    No comparison
    54
    Why this score
    SourceDestination HPN Fera Primus
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 5 tests–54
Scores at a glance
CategoryFirestone Destination HPNexen N Fera Primus
Relative Score – 71
Dry – 75
Wet – 85
Comfort – 57
Noise – 65
Treadwear – 50
Handling (owners) – 75
Efficiency – 54

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Destination HP

± 6

N Fera Primus

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

The professional test results behind the scores

Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.

DisciplineCategoryDestination HPN Fera PrimusΔHead-to-head
Also published by the testers (not in the score)
Overall Ranking Overall #3/15 2017 ADAC SUV Summer Tyre Test #7/10 2026 Vi Bilagare Summer Tyre Test – Different tests

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Destination HP

Pros

  • Exceptional traction in diverse off-road conditions including sand, mud, and grass
  • Strong performance while towing heavy loads
  • Reliable handling across varied terrain and bitumen surfaces

Cons

  • Rapid or uneven tread wear on the outer edges
  • Potential for soft compound degradation under specific driving patterns
  • Inconsistent longevity compared to premium alternatives
All owner themes in the Destination HP review

Tire B N Fera Primus

Pros

  • Fantastic dry and wet grip with stable cornering and predictable handling
  • High level of comfort with a smooth, soft ride that absorbs bumps well
  • Noticeably quieter than certain premium alternatives

Cons

  • Slightly longer braking distances compared to some competing brands like Falken
  • Reports of faster tread wear and relatively low initial tread depth
  • Can be noisy for some drivers depending on the vehicle and road conditions
All owner themes in the N Fera Primus review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Firestone Destination HP B · Nexen N Fera Primus
CategorySummer Premium Touring tiresSummer
Vehicle typeSUV and 4x4Passenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available2250
Rim diameters15″ – 20″15″ – 19″
Sizes in common44

Which one should you actually buy?

Firestone Destination HP

Nexen N Fera Primus

Only Nexen N Fera Primus has enough test and review data for a Relative Score, so there is no head-to-head winner yet.

Tire A · Firestone Destination HP
Check price on Amazon
Tire B · Nexen N Fera Primus
Check price on Amazon

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology