tirewheelguide
Head-to-head Updated

Yokohama Geolandar H/T G056 vs Firestone Destination HP — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 35 + 2 owner reviews. How we score

Check price on Amazon · Geolandar H/T G056 Check price on Amazon · Destination HP
Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Firestone Destination HP
Tire BFirestone

Destination HP

Summer Premium Touring tires

Tests – · none yet Owners – · 2 reviews (needs 5)

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 72

    Dry

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceGeolandar H/T G056Destination HP
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 70 (est.)–
    Reviews found online74–

    Geolandar H/T G056: 60% × 70.5 (est.) + 40% × 73.8 = 72

    No road tests of dry for Geolandar H/T G056. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).

  2. 70

    Wet

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceGeolandar H/T G056Destination HP
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 71 (est.)–
    Reviews found online70–

    Geolandar H/T G056: 60% × 70.5 (est.) + 40% × 70.3 = 70

    No road tests of wet for Geolandar H/T G056. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. 58

    Snow

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceGeolandar H/T G056Destination HP
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 63 (est.)–
    Reviews found online50–

    Geolandar H/T G056: 60% × 63.1 (est.) + 40% × 50.4 = 58

    No road tests of snow for Geolandar H/T G056. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).

  4. 69

    Comfort

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceGeolandar H/T G056Destination HP
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 69 (est.)–
    Reviews found online69–

    Geolandar H/T G056: 40% × 69.2 (est.) + 60% × 69.3 = 69

    No road tests of comfort for Geolandar H/T G056. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. 69

    Noise

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceGeolandar H/T G056Destination HP
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 67 (est.)–
    Reviews found online72–

    Geolandar H/T G056: 60% × 66.6 (est.) + 40% × 72.1 = 69

    No road tests of noise for Geolandar H/T G056. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 64

    Treadwear

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceGeolandar H/T G056Destination HP
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 65 (est.)–
    Reviews found online63–

    Geolandar H/T G056: 60% × 64.9 (est.) + 40% × 62.7 = 64

    No road tests of treadwear for Geolandar H/T G056. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).

  7. 69

    Handling (owners)

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceGeolandar H/T G056Destination HP
    Reviews found online69–
Scores at a glance
CategoryYokohama Geolandar H/T G056Firestone Destination HP
Relative Score 68 –
Dry 72 –
Wet 70 –
Snow 58 –
Comfort 69 –
Noise 69 –
Treadwear 64 –
Handling (owners) 69 –

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
± 7

Geolandar H/T G056

Destination HP

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Geolandar H/T G056

Pros

  • Excellent ride comfort and low road noise
  • Strong dry pavement handling and stability
  • Impressive tread longevity for many users

Cons

  • Inconsistent performance in wet and snowy conditions
  • Reports of premature tread wear in heavy-duty or high-torque applications
  • Occasional complaints regarding road noise or 'growling' sounds as the tire ages
All owner themes in the Geolandar H/T G056 review

Tire B Destination HP

Pros

  • Exceptional traction in diverse off-road conditions including sand, mud, and grass
  • Strong performance while towing heavy loads
  • Reliable handling across varied terrain and bitumen surfaces

Cons

  • Rapid or uneven tread wear on the outer edges
  • Potential for soft compound degradation under specific driving patterns
  • Inconsistent longevity compared to premium alternatives
All owner themes in the Destination HP review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Yokohama Geolandar H/T G056 B · Firestone Destination HP
CategoryAll SeasonSummer Premium Touring tires
Vehicle typeSUV and 4x4SUV and 4x4
Sizes available5622
Rim diameters15″ – 22″15″ – 20″
Tread depth11/32″—
UTQG720 A A—
Treadwear warranty70,000 mi—
SidewallBlackwall—
Max pressure51 psi—
Sizes in common77

Which one should you actually buy?

Yokohama Geolandar H/T G056

Firestone Destination HP

Only Yokohama Geolandar H/T G056 has enough test and review data for a Relative Score, so there is no head-to-head winner yet.

Tire A · Yokohama Geolandar H/T G056
Check price on Amazon
Tire B · Firestone Destination HP
Check price on Amazon

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology