tirewheelguide
Head-to-head Updated

Firestone Destination M/T2 vs Toyo Open Country WT — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 39 + 5 owner reviews. How we score

Open Country WT is ahead, 75–68

Check price on Amazon · Open Country WT or Destination M/T2 on Amazon
Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 69

    Dry

    Open Country WT +6
    75
    Why this score
    SourceDestination M/T2Open Country WT
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 69 (est.)≈ 72 (est.)
    Reviews found online7079

    Destination M/T2: 60% × 68.6 (est.) + 40% × 70 = 69

    Open Country WT: 60% × 72.3 (est.) + 40% × 79.1 = 75

    No road tests of dry for Destination M/T2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

    No road tests of dry for Open Country WT. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

  2. 71

    Wet

    Open Country WT +8
    79
    Why this score
    SourceDestination M/T2Open Country WT
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 71 (est.)≈ 77 (est.)
    Reviews found online7283

    Destination M/T2: 60% × 71 (est.) + 40% × 72 = 71

    Open Country WT: 60% × 77.1 (est.) + 40% × 82.9 = 79

    No road tests of wet for Destination M/T2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

    No road tests of wet for Open Country WT. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

  3. 70

    Snow

    Open Country WT +2
    72
    Why this score
    SourceDestination M/T2Open Country WT
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 70 (est.)≈ 71 (est.)
    Reviews found online7174

    Destination M/T2: 60% × 70.2 (est.) + 40% × 70.7 = 70

    Open Country WT: 60% × 71.1 (est.) + 40% × 73.6 = 72

    No road tests of snow for Destination M/T2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).

    No road tests of snow for Open Country WT. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).

  4. 66

    Comfort

    Open Country WT +7
    73
    Why this score
    SourceDestination M/T2Open Country WT
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 68 (est.)≈ 70 (est.)
    Reviews found online6377

    Destination M/T2: 60% × 68.1 (est.) + 40% × 63.3 = 66

    Open Country WT: 60% × 70.4 (est.) + 40% × 76.6 = 73

    No road tests of comfort for Destination M/T2 or Open Country WT. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. 61

    Noise

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceDestination M/T2Open Country WT
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 67 (est.)–
    Reviews found online52–

    Destination M/T2: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 52.3 = 61

    No road tests of noise for Destination M/T2. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 60

    Treadwear

    Open Country WT +11
    71
    Why this score
    SourceDestination M/T2Open Country WT
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 63 (est.)≈ 68 (est.)
    Reviews found online5675

    Destination M/T2: 60% × 62.7 (est.) + 40% × 56.1 = 60

    Open Country WT: 60% × 68.4 (est.) + 40% × 74.5 = 71

    No road tests of treadwear for Destination M/T2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

    No road tests of treadwear for Open Country WT. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

  7. 66

    Handling (owners)

    Open Country WT +14
    80
    Why this score
    SourceDestination M/T2Open Country WT
    Reviews found online6680
Scores at a glance
CategoryFirestone Destination M/T2Toyo Open Country WT
Relative Score 68 75
Dry 69 75
Wet 71 79
Snow 70 72
Comfort 66 73
Noise 61 –
Treadwear 60 71
Handling (owners) 66 80

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Destination M/T2

Open Country WT

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Destination M/T2

Pros

  • Unexpectedly low road noise for a mud-terrain tire
  • Exceptional off-road traction in mud, sand, and deep snow
  • Good highway manners and stable handling

Cons

  • Can develop cupping and increased noise if maintenance/rotations are neglected
  • Slight initial slip on road paint during the first few thousand miles
  • Mixed reports on longevity when heavily utilized for towing or rough gravel service
All owner themes in the Destination M/T2 review

Tire B Open Country WT

Pros

  • Exceptional performance and traction in snow, ice, slush, and wet weather
  • Surprising longevity and slow tread wear over high mileage (20,000 to 30,000 miles)
  • Good versatility and capability for light off-road use, unmade tracks, and muddy fields

Cons

  • Slightly increased road noise compared to standard road tires, though not overly intrusive
All owner themes in the Open Country WT review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Firestone Destination M/T2 B · Toyo Open Country WT
CategoryMud-Terrain tireWinter
Vehicle typeSUV and 4x4SUV and 4x4
Sizes available188
Rim diameters15″ – 20″16″ – 19″
Tread depth19/32″—
SidewallOutlined White Lettering—
Max pressure50 psi—
Sizes in common00

Which one should you actually buy?

Firestone Destination M/T2

Toyo Open Country WT

Winner: Toyo Open Country WT — better handling, treadwear and wet. It leads or ties in every category we score. Toyo Open Country WT rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 5 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire B You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Toyo Open Country WT scores 80 vs 66 on handling.

Pick tire B You want the longest tread life

Toyo Open Country WT scores 71 vs 60 on treadwear.

Pick tire B Your priority is wet-weather safety

Toyo Open Country WT scores 79 vs 71 on wet.

Pick tire B You want the most comfortable ride

Toyo Open Country WT scores 73 vs 66 on comfort.

Tire A · Firestone Destination M/T2
Check price on Amazon
Tire B · Toyo Open Country WT
Check price on Amazon

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Destination M/T2 or Open Country WT?

Which is better in the wet, Destination M/T2 or Open Country WT?

Toyo Open Country WT, 79 vs 71 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, Destination M/T2 or Open Country WT?

Toyo Open Country WT, 75 vs 69 on our dry score.

Which is better in snow, Destination M/T2 or Open Country WT?

Neither, by our numbers: 70 vs 72 on the snow score, within 3 points.

Which is more comfortable, Destination M/T2 or Open Country WT?

Toyo Open Country WT, 73 vs 66 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, Destination M/T2 or Open Country WT?

Toyo Open Country WT, 71 vs 60 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology