Tests – · none yet Owners 51 · 7 reviews
Firestone F590 looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.
Firestone F590 vs Hankook Ventus V2 concept2 H457 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 7 + 128 owner reviews. How we score
Ventus V2 concept2 H457 is ahead, 61–56
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 57 · 128 reviews
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
55
Dry
Ventus V2 concept2 H457 +762Why this score
Source F590 Ventus V2 concept2 H457 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 59 (est.) ≈ 64 (est.) Reviews found online 47 58 F590: 60% × 59.4 (est.) + 40% × 47.3 = 55
Ventus V2 concept2 H457: 60% × 64 (est.) + 40% × 58.3 = 62
No road tests of dry for F590. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
No road tests of dry for Ventus V2 concept2 H457. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
-
57
Wet
Ventus V2 concept2 H457 +158Why this score
Source F590 Ventus V2 concept2 H457 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 60 (est.) ≈ 61 (est.) Reviews found online 51 54 F590: 60% × 60.1 (est.) + 40% × 51.2 = 57
Ventus V2 concept2 H457: 60% × 61.3 (est.) + 40% × 53.5 = 58
No road tests of wet for F590. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
No road tests of wet for Ventus V2 concept2 H457. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
–
Snow
No comparison55Why this score
Source F590 Ventus V2 concept2 H457 Professional tests (TWG score) – ≈ 62 (est.) Reviews found online – 44 Ventus V2 concept2 H457: 60% × 62.1 (est.) + 40% × 44 = 55
No road tests of snow for Ventus V2 concept2 H457. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).
-
61
Comfort
Ventus V2 concept2 H457 +364Why this score
Source F590 Ventus V2 concept2 H457 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 66 (est.) ≈ 67 (est.) Reviews found online 57 62 F590: 40% × 66.3 (est.) + 60% × 57 = 61
Ventus V2 concept2 H457: 40% × 67.3 (est.) + 60% × 61.9 = 64
No road tests of comfort for F590. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
No road tests of comfort for Ventus V2 concept2 H457. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
-
–
Noise
No comparison67Why this score
Source F590 Ventus V2 concept2 H457 Professional tests (TWG score) – ≈ 66 (est.) Reviews found online – 68 Ventus V2 concept2 H457: 60% × 66.4 (est.) + 40% × 68.4 = 67
No road tests of noise for Ventus V2 concept2 H457. The test half is the tested tires’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
58
Treadwear
Ventus V2 concept2 H457 +664Why this score
Source F590 Ventus V2 concept2 H457 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 62 (est.) ≈ 65 (est.) Reviews found online 54 63 F590: 60% × 61.8 (est.) + 40% × 53.5 = 58
Ventus V2 concept2 H457: 60% × 65.2 (est.) + 40% × 62.9 = 64
No road tests of treadwear for F590. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
No road tests of treadwear for Ventus V2 concept2 H457. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
-
46
Handling (owners)
Ventus V2 concept2 H457 +1056Why this score
Source F590 Ventus V2 concept2 H457 Reviews found online 46 56
Scores at a glance
| Category | Firestone F590 | Hankook Ventus V2 concept2 H457 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 56 | 61 |
| Dry | 55 | 62 |
| Wet | 57 | 58 |
| Snow | – | 55 |
| Comfort | 61 | 64 |
| Noise | – | 67 |
| Treadwear | 58 | 64 |
| Handling (owners) | 46 | 56 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
F590
Ventus V2 concept2 H457
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A F590
Pros
- Effective hydroplaning resistance in heavy rain
- Adequate dry grip for standard daily driving
- Reliable performance for basic commuting needs
Cons
- Poor traction during low-speed acceleration leading to wheel spin
- Premature tread wear and sidewall perishing
- Inconsistent wet weather performance causing safety concerns
Tire B Ventus V2 concept2 H457
Pros
- Exceptional value and budget-friendly pricing
- Very low road noise and a smooth, comfortable ride quality
- Reliable dry traction and good cornering capabilities for daily driving
Cons
- Subpar grip and a tendency to slip or slide in wet conditions
- Soft sidewalls that can feel squishy or flex excessively during hard cornering
- Longer dry and wet braking distances compared to premium performance tires
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Firestone F590 | B · Hankook Ventus V2 concept2 H457 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | All-Season |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | — | 45 |
| Rim diameters | — | 15″ – 20″ |
| Tread depth | — | 9.5/32″ |
| UTQG | 440 A B | 500 A A |
| Treadwear warranty | — | 45,000 mi |
| Sidewall | — | Blackwall |
| Max pressure | — | 51 psi |
Which one should you actually buy?
Firestone F590
Hankook Ventus V2 concept2 H457
Winner: Hankook Ventus V2 concept2 H457 — better handling, dry and treadwear. It leads or ties in every category we score. Firestone F590 rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 7 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Hankook Ventus V2 concept2 H457 scores 56 vs 46 on handling.
Hankook Ventus V2 concept2 H457 scores 62 vs 55 on dry.
Hankook Ventus V2 concept2 H457 scores 64 vs 58 on treadwear.
Hankook Ventus V2 concept2 H457 scores 64 vs 61 on comfort.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
F590 or Ventus V2 concept2 H457?
Which is better in the wet, F590 or Ventus V2 concept2 H457?
Neither, by our numbers: 57 vs 58 on the wet score, within 3 points.
Which grips better on dry roads, F590 or Ventus V2 concept2 H457?
Hankook Ventus V2 concept2 H457, 62 vs 55 on our dry score.
Which is more comfortable, F590 or Ventus V2 concept2 H457?
Hankook Ventus V2 concept2 H457, 64 vs 61 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, F590 or Ventus V2 concept2 H457?
Hankook Ventus V2 concept2 H457, 64 vs 58 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology