tirewheelguide
Head-to-head Updated

Firestone Firehawk 900 vs Firestone RoadHawk — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 17 road tests and 7 + 644 owner reviews. How we score

Firehawk 900 is ahead, 74–58

Check price on Amazon · Firehawk 900 or RoadHawk on Amazon
Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Firestone RoadHawk
Tire BFirestone

RoadHawk

Summer

± 6

Tests 70 · 17 tests Owners 40 · 644 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 15 in 2019 Summer and All Season Tyre Test (wet handling)

“Not sure if it is what you are looking for. I am Polish but I live in the USA. I am still following info from Poland but I am not buying tires there anymore. A magazine Motor tests tires. magazynauto.pl Firestone was included in their "accessibly priced" summer tires: Firestone Roadhawk. They lost to Uniroyal, Semperit, Dębica but were ahead of Kumho, Apollo, Tomket, Imperial and Double Coin. They were not included in their premium and middle priced test. German based Auto Bild (and its Polish version Auto Świat) did a test in 2019 and the same Roadhawk passed the elimination test (53 down to 20: wet and dry braking distances added together as #13) and finished #18 in detailed test. So Firestone is present in Poland and Europe as a cheaper brand from Bridgestone but how popular it is I do not know. Krzyś”

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 73

    Dry

    Firehawk 900 +5
    68
    Why this score
    SourceFirehawk 900RoadHawk
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 16 tests≈ 71 (est.)82
    Reviews found online7646

    Firehawk 900: 60% × 71.1 (est.) + 40% × 75.5 = 73

    RoadHawk: 60% × 82.2 + 40% × 46 = 68

    No road tests of dry for Firehawk 900. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).

  2. 75

    Wet

    Firehawk 900 +10
    65
    Why this score
    SourceFirehawk 900RoadHawk
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 17 tests≈ 74 (est.)76
    Reviews found online7647

    Firehawk 900: 60% × 73.7 (est.) + 40% × 76.1 = 75

    RoadHawk: 60% × 76.3 + 40% × 47.3 = 65

    No road tests of wet for Firehawk 900. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. 76

    Comfort

    Firehawk 900 +26
    50
    Why this score
    SourceFirehawk 900RoadHawk
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 2 tests≈ 71 (est.)67
    Reviews found online7939

    Firehawk 900: 40% × 70.7 (est.) + 60% × 79 = 76

    RoadHawk: 40% × 67.1 + 60% × 39 = 50

    No road tests of comfort for Firehawk 900. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

  4. 71

    Noise

    Firehawk 900 +26
    45
    Why this score
    SourceFirehawk 900RoadHawk
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 8 tests≈ 66 (est.)31
    Reviews found online78≈ 66 (est.)

    Firehawk 900: 60% × 66.4 (est.) + 40% × 77.9 = 71

    RoadHawk: 60% × 30.6 + 40% × 66.4 (est.) = 45

    No road tests of noise for Firehawk 900. The test half is the tested tires’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

    No owner ratings of noise for RoadHawk. The owner half is the owners’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.

  5. 73

    Treadwear

    Firehawk 900 +23
    50
    Why this score
    SourceFirehawk 900RoadHawk
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 6 tests≈ 70 (est.)64
    Reviews found online7729

    Firehawk 900: 60% × 70.3 (est.) + 40% × 77 = 73

    RoadHawk: 60% × 64.3 + 40% × 28.9 = 50

    No road tests of treadwear for Firehawk 900. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

  6. 79

    Handling (owners)

    Firehawk 900 +44
    35
    Why this score
    SourceFirehawk 900RoadHawk
    Reviews found online7935
  7. –

    Efficiency

    No comparison
    72
    Why this score
    SourceFirehawk 900RoadHawk
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 9 tests–72
Scores at a glance
CategoryFirestone Firehawk 900Firestone RoadHawk
Relative Score 74 58
Dry 73 68
Wet 75 65
Comfort 76 50
Noise 71 45
Treadwear 73 50
Handling (owners) 79 35
Efficiency – 72

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Recomputed
Headline score
± 8

Firehawk 900

± 6

RoadHawk

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Firehawk 900

Pros

  • Reliable and safe grip in both wet and dry conditions
  • Good ride comfort and bump absorption on rough or uneven roads
  • Attractive aesthetic appearance

Cons

  • Noticeable road noise, especially reported with run-flat versions at lower speeds or with windows down
  • Potential to receive older, pre-dated stock from retailers affecting rubber longevity
  • Dry grip can diminish as the tire ages
All owner themes in the Firehawk 900 review

Tire B RoadHawk

Pros

  • Exceptional wet weather performance, particularly in standing water and heavy rain
  • Strong dry grip and confident cornering for daily driving
  • Comfortable ride quality with good bump absorption

Cons

  • Accelerated and sometimes uneven tread wear, resulting in shorter-than-expected lifespan
  • Soft sidewalls that can cause a visual 'under-inflated' bulge and spongy cornering response
  • Limited steering feedback and precision during spirited driving
All owner themes in the RoadHawk review

What real owners are saying

From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score

Tire A

Firestone Firehawk 900

We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.

Tire B

Firestone RoadHawk

Mixed

Community discussions reflect mixed perspectives on the Firestone Roadhawk, noting reasonable reviews alongside concerns regarding tread wear. While some test results place it competitively among budget-friendly summer options, owners also discuss practical issues such as unusual noises, generational replacement difficulties, and overall value.

r/automobil ·2025-11-20

“sind diese Sommerreifen noch okay? Im August 2023 gekauft und circa 25 tausend km gefahren. Firestone Roadhawk, DOT 4922. Habe an meinem Opel Meriva beim Anfahren nach links, zB beim Ausparken oder beim Anfahren in einer engen Linkskurve von vorne rechts ein mehrmaliges Poltern gehört. Habe ein bisschen gegoogelt und von ausgeschlagenem Querlenker gelesen. Im Oktober 2022 hat das Auto einen neuen Vorderachsträger und neue Querlenker bekommen. Nun habe ich Winterräder montiert und das Poltern beim Anfahren nach links ist weg. Was kann das sein? Read more”
r/tires ·2026-04-22

“I cant for the life of me find a Firestone Roadhawk (gen1) 205/50 R17 93W XL anywhere in Europe. The problem is GEN 1 is over, and all they have is GEN 2, aka Roadhawk 2. And i have 3 perfectly good Roadhawk (GEN 1), and no tire to make a set. Some sellers even post pictures of GEN 1, but they actually send you GEN 2. Which im pretty sure have a different profile, and markings. Any ideas ?”
Top themes
#tread wear concerns#budget tire test results#replacement availability issues#generation differences#driving noise symptoms

Based on 5 community posts

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Firestone Firehawk 900 B · Firestone RoadHawk
CategorySummerSummer
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available—115
Rim diameters—15″ – 21″
UTQG300 A A—
SidewallBlackwall—
Max pressure42 psi—

Which one should you actually buy?

Firestone Firehawk 900

Firestone RoadHawk

Winner: Firestone Firehawk 900 — better handling, comfort and noise. It leads or ties in every category we score. Firestone Firehawk 900 rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 7 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire A You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Firestone Firehawk 900 scores 79 vs 35 on handling.

Pick tire A You want the most comfortable ride

Firestone Firehawk 900 scores 76 vs 50 on comfort.

Pick tire A You want a quieter cabin

Firestone Firehawk 900 scores 71 vs 45 on noise.

Pick tire A You want the longest tread life

Firestone Firehawk 900 scores 73 vs 50 on treadwear.

Tire A · Firestone Firehawk 900
Check price on Amazon
Tire B · Firestone RoadHawk
Check price on Amazon

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Firehawk 900 or RoadHawk?

Which is better in the wet, Firehawk 900 or RoadHawk?

Firestone Firehawk 900, 75 vs 65 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, Firehawk 900 or RoadHawk?

Firestone Firehawk 900, 73 vs 68 on our dry score.

Which is quieter, Firehawk 900 or RoadHawk?

Firestone Firehawk 900, 71 vs 45 on our noise score.

Which is more comfortable, Firehawk 900 or RoadHawk?

Firestone Firehawk 900, 76 vs 50 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, Firehawk 900 or RoadHawk?

Firestone Firehawk 900, 73 vs 50 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology