Tests – · none yet Owners 75 · 5 reviews
Firestone Firehawk 900 vs Pirelli CINTURA/TO P1 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 5 + 35 owner reviews. How we score
Firehawk 900 leads, 73–69 Narrow edge
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 69 · 35 reviews
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
71
Dry
Firehawk 900 +368Why this score
Source Firehawk 900 CINTURA/TO P1 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 70 (est.) ≈ 68 (est.) Reviews found online 72 69 Firehawk 900: 60% × 69.8 (est.) + 40% × 72.2 = 71
CINTURA/TO P1: 60% × 68.3 (est.) + 40% × 68.5 = 68
No road tests of dry for Firehawk 900. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).
No road tests of dry for CINTURA/TO P1. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).
-
75
Wet
Firehawk 900 +570Why this score
Source Firehawk 900 CINTURA/TO P1 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 74 (est.) ≈ 71 (est.) Reviews found online 77 70 Firehawk 900: 60% × 74.2 (est.) + 40% × 77 = 75
CINTURA/TO P1: 60% × 70.5 (est.) + 40% × 70.3 = 70
No road tests of wet for Firehawk 900. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
No road tests of wet for CINTURA/TO P1. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
74
Comfort
Firehawk 900 +371Why this score
Source Firehawk 900 CINTURA/TO P1 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 70 (est.) ≈ 70 (est.) Reviews found online 76 72 Firehawk 900: 40% × 70.4 (est.) + 60% × 75.9 = 74
CINTURA/TO P1: 40% × 69.6 (est.) + 60% × 71.8 = 71
No road tests of comfort for Firehawk 900 or CINTURA/TO P1. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
71
Treadwear
Firehawk 900 +368Why this score
Source Firehawk 900 CINTURA/TO P1 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 69 (est.) ≈ 67 (est.) Reviews found online 75 69 Firehawk 900: 60% × 69.2 (est.) + 40% × 74.8 = 71
CINTURA/TO P1: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 69.4 = 68
No road tests of treadwear for Firehawk 900. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).
No road tests of treadwear for CINTURA/TO P1. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).
-
77
Handling (owners)
Firehawk 900 +1067Why this score
Source Firehawk 900 CINTURA/TO P1 Reviews found online 77 67
Scores at a glance
| Category | Firestone Firehawk 900 | Pirelli CINTURA/TO P1 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 73 | 69 |
| Dry | 71 | 68 |
| Wet | 75 | 70 |
| Comfort | 74 | 71 |
| Treadwear | 71 | 68 |
| Handling (owners) | 77 | 67 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Firehawk 900
CINTURA/TO P1
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Firehawk 900
Pros
- Reliable wet and dry traction
- Strong durability and impact resistance against potholes
- High level of ride comfort and bump absorption
Cons
- Noticeable road noise, especially at lower speeds
- Run-flat variants may be unsuitable for certain vehicle suspension setups
- Dry grip performance can degrade noticeably as the tire ages
Tire B CINTURA/TO P1
Pros
- Exceptional tread longevity and high mileage capability
- Superior ride comfort and bump absorption
- Low road noise levels
Cons
- Noticeable decline in grip and handling as tread depth decreases
- Reports of sidewall bulges and structural fragility
- Inconsistent wet-weather performance compared to premium sport tires
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Firestone Firehawk 900 | B · Pirelli CINTURA/TO P1 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | — | 37 |
| Rim diameters | — | 14″ – 19″ |
Which one should you actually buy?
Firestone Firehawk 900
Pirelli CINTURA/TO P1
Narrow edge: Firestone Firehawk 900 — better handling, wet and dry. It leads or ties in every category we score. Firestone Firehawk 900 rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 5 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Firestone Firehawk 900 scores 77 vs 67 on handling.
Firestone Firehawk 900 scores 75 vs 70 on wet.
Firestone Firehawk 900 scores 71 vs 68 on dry.
Firestone Firehawk 900 scores 74 vs 71 on comfort.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Firehawk 900 or CINTURA/TO P1?
Which is better in the wet, Firehawk 900 or CINTURA/TO P1?
Firestone Firehawk 900, 75 vs 70 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, Firehawk 900 or CINTURA/TO P1?
Firestone Firehawk 900, 71 vs 68 on our dry score.
Which is more comfortable, Firehawk 900 or CINTURA/TO P1?
Firestone Firehawk 900, 74 vs 71 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, Firehawk 900 or CINTURA/TO P1?
Firestone Firehawk 900, 71 vs 68 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology