Tests – · none yet Owners 69 · 35 reviews
Pirelli CINTURA/TO P1 vs Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 35 + 60 owner reviews. How we score
BluEarth Es ES32 leads, 71–69 Narrow edge
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 71 · 60 reviews
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
68
Dry
BluEarth Es ES32 +270Why this score
Source CINTURA/TO P1 BluEarth Es ES32 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 68 (est.) ≈ 69 (est.) Reviews found online 69 71 CINTURA/TO P1: 60% × 68.3 (est.) + 40% × 68.5 = 68
BluEarth Es ES32: 60% × 69.5 (est.) + 40% × 71.4 = 70
No road tests of dry for CINTURA/TO P1. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).
No road tests of dry for BluEarth Es ES32. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).
-
70
Wet
BluEarth Es ES32 +474Why this score
Source CINTURA/TO P1 BluEarth Es ES32 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 71 (est.) ≈ 73 (est.) Reviews found online 70 75 CINTURA/TO P1: 60% × 70.5 (est.) + 40% × 70.3 = 70
BluEarth Es ES32: 60% × 73 (est.) + 40% × 74.8 = 74
No road tests of wet for CINTURA/TO P1. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
No road tests of wet for BluEarth Es ES32. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
71
Comfort
BluEarth Es ES32 +273Why this score
Source CINTURA/TO P1 BluEarth Es ES32 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 70 (est.) ≈ 70 (est.) Reviews found online 72 75 CINTURA/TO P1: 40% × 69.6 (est.) + 60% × 71.8 = 71
BluEarth Es ES32: 40% × 70.1 (est.) + 60% × 74.7 = 73
No road tests of comfort for CINTURA/TO P1 or BluEarth Es ES32. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
68
Treadwear
CINTURA/TO P1 +365Why this score
Source CINTURA/TO P1 BluEarth Es ES32 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 67 (est.) ≈ 66 (est.) Reviews found online 69 65 CINTURA/TO P1: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 69.4 = 68
BluEarth Es ES32: 60% × 65.6 (est.) + 40% × 64.6 = 65
No road tests of treadwear for CINTURA/TO P1. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).
No road tests of treadwear for BluEarth Es ES32. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).
-
67
Handling (owners)
BluEarth Es ES32 +875Why this score
Source CINTURA/TO P1 BluEarth Es ES32 Reviews found online 67 75
Scores at a glance
| Category | Pirelli CINTURA/TO P1 | Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 69 | 71 |
| Dry | 68 | 70 |
| Wet | 70 | 74 |
| Comfort | 71 | 73 |
| Treadwear | 68 | 65 |
| Handling (owners) | 67 | 75 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
CINTURA/TO P1
BluEarth Es ES32
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A CINTURA/TO P1
Pros
- Exceptional tread longevity and high mileage capability
- Superior ride comfort and bump absorption
- Low road noise levels
Cons
- Noticeable decline in grip and handling as tread depth decreases
- Reports of sidewall bulges and structural fragility
- Inconsistent wet-weather performance compared to premium sport tires
Tire B BluEarth Es ES32
Pros
- Exceptional ride comfort and noise reduction
- Strong value proposition compared to premium brands
- Reliable dry-weather traction and handling
Cons
- Wet-weather grip can become unpredictable as tread depth decreases
- Inconsistent tread life, with some users reporting premature wear
- Sidewalls may be susceptible to damage from severe potholes
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Pirelli CINTURA/TO P1 | B · Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 37 | 64 |
| Rim diameters | 14″ – 19″ | 13″ – 18″ |
| Sizes in common | 31 | 31 |
Which one should you actually buy?
Pirelli CINTURA/TO P1
Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32
Narrow edge: Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 — better handling and wet. Pick the Pirelli CINTURA/TO P1 if treadwear matters most to you.
Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 scores 75 vs 67 on handling.
Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 scores 74 vs 70 on wet.
Pirelli CINTURA/TO P1 scores 68 vs 65 on treadwear.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
CINTURA/TO P1 or BluEarth Es ES32?
Which is better in the wet, CINTURA/TO P1 or BluEarth Es ES32?
Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32, 74 vs 70 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, CINTURA/TO P1 or BluEarth Es ES32?
Neither, by our numbers: 68 vs 70 on the dry score, within 3 points.
Which is more comfortable, CINTURA/TO P1 or BluEarth Es ES32?
Neither, by our numbers: 71 vs 73 on the comfort score, within 3 points.
Which lasts longer, CINTURA/TO P1 or BluEarth Es ES32?
Pirelli CINTURA/TO P1, 68 vs 65 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology