tirewheelguide
Head-to-head Updated

Pirelli CINTURA/TO P1 vs Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 41 + 63 owner reviews. How we score

BluEarth Es ES32 leads, 72–70 Narrow edge

Check price on Amazon · BluEarth Es ES32 or CINTURA/TO P1 on Amazon
Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 68

    Dry

    BluEarth Es ES32 +3
    71
    Why this score
    SourceCINTURA/TO P1BluEarth Es ES32
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 68 (est.)≈ 70 (est.)
    Reviews found online6873

    CINTURA/TO P1: 60% × 67.9 (est.) + 40% × 67.9 = 68

    BluEarth Es ES32: 60% × 70.1 (est.) + 40% × 73 = 71

    No road tests of dry for CINTURA/TO P1. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).

    No road tests of dry for BluEarth Es ES32. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).

  2. 72

    Wet

    BluEarth Es ES32 +3
    75
    Why this score
    SourceCINTURA/TO P1BluEarth Es ES32
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 71 (est.)≈ 74 (est.)
    Reviews found online7276

    CINTURA/TO P1: 60% × 71.5 (est.) + 40% × 72 = 72

    BluEarth Es ES32: 60% × 73.8 (est.) + 40% × 76.2 = 75

    No road tests of wet for CINTURA/TO P1. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

    No road tests of wet for BluEarth Es ES32. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. 73

    Snow

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceCINTURA/TO P1BluEarth Es ES32
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 72 (est.)–
    Reviews found online75–

    CINTURA/TO P1: 60% × 72.1 (est.) + 40% × 75.4 = 73

    No road tests of snow for CINTURA/TO P1. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).

  4. 71

    Comfort

    BluEarth Es ES32 +3
    74
    Why this score
    SourceCINTURA/TO P1BluEarth Es ES32
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 69 (est.)≈ 70 (est.)
    Reviews found online7276

    CINTURA/TO P1: 40% × 69.4 (est.) + 60% × 71.9 = 71

    BluEarth Es ES32: 40% × 70.2 (est.) + 60% × 75.8 = 74

    No road tests of comfort for CINTURA/TO P1. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

    No road tests of comfort for BluEarth Es ES32. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

  5. 69

    Noise

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceCINTURA/TO P1BluEarth Es ES32
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 66 (est.)–
    Reviews found online74–

    CINTURA/TO P1: 60% × 66.3 (est.) + 40% × 73.6 = 69

    No road tests of noise for CINTURA/TO P1. The test half is the tested tires’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 70

    Treadwear

    CINTURA/TO P1 +3
    67
    Why this score
    SourceCINTURA/TO P1BluEarth Es ES32
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 68 (est.)≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online7267

    CINTURA/TO P1: 60% × 68.3 (est.) + 40% × 71.5 = 70

    BluEarth Es ES32: 60% × 66.5 (est.) + 40% × 66.5 = 67

    No road tests of treadwear for CINTURA/TO P1. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

    No road tests of treadwear for BluEarth Es ES32. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

  7. 67

    Handling (owners)

    BluEarth Es ES32 +9
    76
    Why this score
    SourceCINTURA/TO P1BluEarth Es ES32
    Reviews found online6776
Scores at a glance
CategoryPirelli CINTURA/TO P1Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32
Relative Score 70 72
Dry 68 71
Wet 72 75
Snow 73 –
Comfort 71 74
Noise 69 –
Treadwear 70 67
Handling (owners) 67 76

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
± 8

CINTURA/TO P1

± 8

BluEarth Es ES32

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A CINTURA/TO P1

Pros

  • Exceptional tread life and long mileage capability
  • Quiet, low-noise highway and city performance
  • High level of ride comfort and good bump absorption

Cons

  • Decline in wet grip and overall performance as the tread wears down
  • Stiffens up significantly past half-life
  • Reports of sidewall weakness and premature structural bulges
All owner themes in the CINTURA/TO P1 review

Tire B BluEarth Es ES32

Pros

  • Exceptional ride comfort and smoothness over bumps
  • Noticeably low road noise and quiet operation
  • Strong value for money compared to premium brands

Cons

  • Faster-than-average tread wear reported by some drivers
  • Diminished wet weather grip and increased skidding risk as the tread wears down
  • Not suited for high-performance driving or aggressive cornering
All owner themes in the BluEarth Es ES32 review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Pirelli CINTURA/TO P1 B · Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32
CategorySummerSummer
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available3764
Rim diameters14″ – 19″13″ – 18″
Tread depth10/32″—
UTQG420 A A—
SidewallBlackwall—
Max pressure51 psi—
Sizes in common3131

Which one should you actually buy?

Pirelli CINTURA/TO P1

Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32

Narrow edge: Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 — better handling, dry and wet. Pick the Pirelli CINTURA/TO P1 if treadwear matters most to you.

Pick tire B You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 scores 76 vs 67 on handling.

Pick tire A You want the longest tread life

Pirelli CINTURA/TO P1 scores 70 vs 67 on treadwear.

Pick tire B You want the most grip on dry roads

Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 scores 71 vs 68 on dry.

Pick tire B Your priority is wet-weather safety

Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 scores 75 vs 72 on wet.

Tire A · Pirelli CINTURA/TO P1
Check price on Amazon
Tire B · Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32
Check price on Amazon

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

CINTURA/TO P1 or BluEarth Es ES32?

Which is better in the wet, CINTURA/TO P1 or BluEarth Es ES32?

Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32, 75 vs 72 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, CINTURA/TO P1 or BluEarth Es ES32?

Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32, 71 vs 68 on our dry score.

Which is more comfortable, CINTURA/TO P1 or BluEarth Es ES32?

Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32, 74 vs 71 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, CINTURA/TO P1 or BluEarth Es ES32?

Pirelli CINTURA/TO P1, 70 vs 67 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology