Tests – · none yet Owners 69 · 8 reviews
Head-to-head
Updated
Firestone Firehawk AS vs Firestone MultiSeason — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 8 + 10 owner reviews. How we score
Too close to call: Firehawk AS and MultiSeason are level at 69.
Add your size for an exact match
/R
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 69 · 10 reviews
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
70
Dry
Firehawk AS +367Why this score
Source Firehawk AS MultiSeason Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 69 (est.) ≈ 67 (est.) Reviews found online 71 67 Firehawk AS: 60% × 69 (est.) + 40% × 70.6 = 70
MultiSeason: 60% × 67.4 (est.) + 40% × 66.6 = 67
No road tests of dry for Firehawk AS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
No road tests of dry for MultiSeason. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
-
69
Wet
MultiSeason +170Why this score
Source Firehawk AS MultiSeason Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 69 (est.) ≈ 70 (est.) Reviews found online 68 70 Firehawk AS: 60% × 69.4 (est.) + 40% × 68.4 = 69
MultiSeason: 60% × 70.4 (est.) + 40% × 70.2 = 70
No road tests of wet for Firehawk AS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
No road tests of wet for MultiSeason. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
66
Snow
MultiSeason +672Why this score
Source Firehawk AS MultiSeason Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 68 (est.) ≈ 71 (est.) Reviews found online 62 73 Firehawk AS: 60% × 67.9 (est.) + 40% × 62.4 = 66
MultiSeason: 60% × 71.2 (est.) + 40% × 72.6 = 72
No road tests of snow for Firehawk AS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).
No road tests of snow for MultiSeason. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).
-
69
Comfort
Firehawk AS +366Why this score
Source Firehawk AS MultiSeason Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 69 (est.) ≈ 68 (est.) Reviews found online 69 65 Firehawk AS: 40% × 68.7 (est.) + 60% × 68.8 = 69
MultiSeason: 40% × 68 (est.) + 60% × 65.2 = 66
No road tests of comfort for Firehawk AS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
No road tests of comfort for MultiSeason. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
-
70
Noise
No comparison–Why this score
Source Firehawk AS MultiSeason Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 66 (est.) – Reviews found online 74 – Firehawk AS: 60% × 66.4 (est.) + 40% × 74.1 = 70
No road tests of noise for Firehawk AS. The test half is the tested tires’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
70
Treadwear
Firehawk AS +268Why this score
Source Firehawk AS MultiSeason Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 68 (est.) ≈ 67 (est.) Reviews found online 72 68 Firehawk AS: 60% × 68.5 (est.) + 40% × 71.9 = 70
MultiSeason: 60% × 67.1 (est.) + 40% × 68.2 = 68
No road tests of treadwear for Firehawk AS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
No road tests of treadwear for MultiSeason. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
-
67
Handling (owners)
Level67Why this score
Source Firehawk AS MultiSeason Reviews found online 67 67
Scores at a glance
| Category | Firestone Firehawk AS | Firestone MultiSeason |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 69 | 69 |
| Dry | 70 | 67 |
| Wet | 69 | 70 |
| Snow | 66 | 72 |
| Comfort | 69 | 66 |
| Noise | 70 | – |
| Treadwear | 70 | 68 |
| Handling (owners) | 67 | 67 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
69
/ 100
Firehawk AS
69
/ 100
MultiSeason
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Firehawk AS
Pros
- Exceptionally quiet and smooth ride quality
- Strong dry handling and improved cornering response
- Good water dispersion and wet road performance for most users
Cons
- Potential susceptibility to hydroplaning in heavy rain according to select reviewers
- Requires proper balancing to prevent irregular tread wear
Tire B MultiSeason
Pros
- Exceptional traction and grip in snow and icy conditions
- Strong value proposition compared to premium competitors
- Reliable performance for daily commuting in varied climates
Cons
- Inconsistent wet weather grip, particularly during cornering
- Reports of elevated road noise levels for some users
- Potential for premature tread wear depending on driving conditions
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Firestone Firehawk AS | B · Firestone MultiSeason |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All Season High Performance tires | All Season |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 5 | 22 |
| Rim diameters | 15″ – 18″ | 13″ – 16″ |
| Tread depth | 11/32″ | — |
| UTQG | 480 A A | — |
| Treadwear warranty | 50,000 mi | — |
| Sidewall | Blackwall | — |
| Max pressure | 44 psi | — |
| Sizes in common | 1 | 1 |
Which one should you actually buy?
69
/ 100
Firestone Firehawk AS
69
/ 100
Firestone MultiSeason
Too close to call: Firestone Firehawk AS and Firestone MultiSeason are within 2 points overall. Firestone Firehawk AS is stronger on dry and comfort. Firestone MultiSeason is stronger on snow. Firestone Firehawk AS rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 8 reviews), so read this result as provisional. Firestone MultiSeason rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 10 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Pick tire B
You drive through snowy winters
Firestone MultiSeason scores 72 vs 66 on snow.
Pick tire A
You want the most grip on dry roads
Firestone Firehawk AS scores 70 vs 67 on dry.
Pick tire A
You want the most comfortable ride
Firestone Firehawk AS scores 69 vs 66 on comfort.
Tire A · Firestone Firehawk AS
Tire B · Firestone MultiSeason
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Firehawk AS or MultiSeason?
Which is better in the wet, Firehawk AS or MultiSeason?
Neither, by our numbers: 69 vs 70 on the wet score, within 3 points.
Which grips better on dry roads, Firehawk AS or MultiSeason?
Firestone Firehawk AS, 70 vs 67 on our dry score.
Which is better in snow, Firehawk AS or MultiSeason?
Firestone MultiSeason, 72 vs 66 on our snow score.
Which is more comfortable, Firehawk AS or MultiSeason?
Firestone Firehawk AS, 69 vs 66 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, Firehawk AS or MultiSeason?
Neither, by our numbers: 70 vs 68 on the treadwear score, within 3 points.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology