Tests – · none yet Owners 69 · 10 reviews
Head-to-head
Updated
Firestone MultiSeason vs Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 10 + 63 owner reviews. How we score
BluEarth Es ES32 leads, 72–68 Narrow edge
Add your size for an exact match
/R
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 73 · 63 reviews
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
67
Dry
BluEarth Es ES32 +471Why this score
Source MultiSeason BluEarth Es ES32 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 67 (est.) ≈ 70 (est.) Reviews found online 67 73 MultiSeason: 60% × 67.4 (est.) + 40% × 66.6 = 67
BluEarth Es ES32: 60% × 70 (est.) + 40% × 72.9 = 71
No road tests of dry for MultiSeason. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
No road tests of dry for BluEarth Es ES32. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
-
70
Wet
BluEarth Es ES32 +575Why this score
Source MultiSeason BluEarth Es ES32 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 70 (est.) ≈ 74 (est.) Reviews found online 70 76 MultiSeason: 60% × 70.4 (est.) + 40% × 70.2 = 70
BluEarth Es ES32: 60% × 73.7 (est.) + 40% × 76.2 = 75
No road tests of wet for MultiSeason. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
No road tests of wet for BluEarth Es ES32. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
72
Snow
No comparison–Why this score
Source MultiSeason BluEarth Es ES32 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 71 (est.) – Reviews found online 73 – MultiSeason: 60% × 71.2 (est.) + 40% × 72.6 = 72
No road tests of snow for MultiSeason. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).
-
66
Comfort
BluEarth Es ES32 +874Why this score
Source MultiSeason BluEarth Es ES32 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 68 (est.) ≈ 70 (est.) Reviews found online 65 76 MultiSeason: 40% × 68 (est.) + 60% × 65.2 = 66
BluEarth Es ES32: 40% × 70.1 (est.) + 60% × 75.8 = 74
No road tests of comfort for MultiSeason. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
No road tests of comfort for BluEarth Es ES32. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
-
68
Treadwear
MultiSeason +167Why this score
Source MultiSeason BluEarth Es ES32 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 67 (est.) ≈ 67 (est.) Reviews found online 68 67 MultiSeason: 60% × 67.1 (est.) + 40% × 68.2 = 68
BluEarth Es ES32: 60% × 66.5 (est.) + 40% × 66.5 = 67
No road tests of treadwear for MultiSeason. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
No road tests of treadwear for BluEarth Es ES32. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
-
67
Handling (owners)
BluEarth Es ES32 +1077Why this score
Source MultiSeason BluEarth Es ES32 Reviews found online 67 77
Scores at a glance
| Category | Firestone MultiSeason | Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 68 | 72 |
| Dry | 67 | 71 |
| Wet | 70 | 75 |
| Snow | 72 | – |
| Comfort | 66 | 74 |
| Treadwear | 68 | 67 |
| Handling (owners) | 67 | 77 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
68
/ 100
MultiSeason
72
/ 100
BluEarth Es ES32
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A MultiSeason
Pros
- Exceptional traction and grip in snow and icy conditions
- Strong value proposition compared to premium competitors
- Reliable performance for daily commuting in varied climates
Cons
- Inconsistent wet weather grip, particularly during cornering
- Reports of elevated road noise levels for some users
- Potential for premature tread wear depending on driving conditions
Tire B BluEarth Es ES32
Pros
- Exceptional ride comfort and smoothness over bumps
- Noticeably low road noise and quiet operation
- Strong value for money compared to premium brands
Cons
- Faster-than-average tread wear reported by some drivers
- Diminished wet weather grip and increased skidding risk as the tread wears down
- Not suited for high-performance driving or aggressive cornering
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Firestone MultiSeason | B · Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All Season | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 22 | 64 |
| Rim diameters | 13″ – 16″ | 13″ – 18″ |
| Sizes in common | 21 | 21 |
Which one should you actually buy?
68
/ 100
Firestone MultiSeason
72
/ 100
Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32
Narrow edge: Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 — better handling, comfort and wet. Where the Firestone MultiSeason is ahead, it is by less than 3 points. Firestone MultiSeason rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 10 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Pick tire B
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 scores 77 vs 67 on handling.
Pick tire B
You want the most comfortable ride
Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 scores 74 vs 66 on comfort.
Pick tire B
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 scores 75 vs 70 on wet.
Pick tire B
You want the most grip on dry roads
Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 scores 71 vs 67 on dry.
Tire A · Firestone MultiSeason
Tire B · Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
MultiSeason or BluEarth Es ES32?
Which is better in the wet, MultiSeason or BluEarth Es ES32?
Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32, 75 vs 70 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, MultiSeason or BluEarth Es ES32?
Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32, 71 vs 67 on our dry score.
Which is more comfortable, MultiSeason or BluEarth Es ES32?
Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32, 74 vs 66 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, MultiSeason or BluEarth Es ES32?
Neither, by our numbers: 68 vs 67 on the treadwear score, within 3 points.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology