Tests – · none yet Owners 69 · 10 reviews
Firestone MultiSeason vs Bridgestone Alenza AS Ultra — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 10 + 13 owner reviews. How we score
MultiSeason leads, 69–65 Narrow edge
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 61 · 13 reviews
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
67
Dry
MultiSeason +166Why this score
Source MultiSeason Alenza AS Ultra Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 67 (est.) ≈ 67 (est.) Reviews found online 67 65 MultiSeason: 60% × 67.4 (est.) + 40% × 66.6 = 67
Alenza AS Ultra: 60% × 66.6 (est.) + 40% × 64.7 = 66
No road tests of dry for MultiSeason. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
No road tests of dry for Alenza AS Ultra. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
-
70
Wet
MultiSeason +169Why this score
Source MultiSeason Alenza AS Ultra Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 70 (est.) ≈ 70 (est.) Reviews found online 70 69 MultiSeason: 60% × 70.4 (est.) + 40% × 70.2 = 70
Alenza AS Ultra: 60% × 69.7 (est.) + 40% × 68.8 = 69
No road tests of wet for MultiSeason. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
No road tests of wet for Alenza AS Ultra. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
72
Snow
MultiSeason +270Why this score
Source MultiSeason Alenza AS Ultra Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 71 (est.) ≈ 70 (est.) Reviews found online 73 69 MultiSeason: 60% × 71.2 (est.) + 40% × 72.6 = 72
Alenza AS Ultra: 60% × 70 (est.) + 40% × 68.9 = 70
No road tests of snow for MultiSeason. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).
No road tests of snow for Alenza AS Ultra. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).
-
66
Comfort
MultiSeason +264Why this score
Source MultiSeason Alenza AS Ultra Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 68 (est.) ≈ 67 (est.) Reviews found online 65 62 MultiSeason: 40% × 68 (est.) + 60% × 65.2 = 66
Alenza AS Ultra: 40% × 67.3 (est.) + 60% × 62.1 = 64
No road tests of comfort for MultiSeason. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
No road tests of comfort for Alenza AS Ultra. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
-
–
Noise
No comparison62Why this score
Source MultiSeason Alenza AS Ultra Professional tests (TWG score) – ≈ 66 (est.) Reviews found online – 56 Alenza AS Ultra: 60% × 66.4 (est.) + 40% × 56 = 62
No road tests of noise for Alenza AS Ultra. The test half is the tested tires’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
68
Treadwear
MultiSeason +1454Why this score
Source MultiSeason Alenza AS Ultra Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 67 (est.) ≈ 59 (est.) Reviews found online 68 46 MultiSeason: 60% × 67.1 (est.) + 40% × 68.2 = 68
Alenza AS Ultra: 60% × 59.3 (est.) + 40% × 46.4 = 54
No road tests of treadwear for MultiSeason. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
No road tests of treadwear for Alenza AS Ultra. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
-
67
Handling (owners)
MultiSeason +463Why this score
Source MultiSeason Alenza AS Ultra Reviews found online 67 63
Scores at a glance
| Category | Firestone MultiSeason | Bridgestone Alenza AS Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 69 | 65 |
| Dry | 67 | 66 |
| Wet | 70 | 69 |
| Snow | 72 | 70 |
| Comfort | 66 | 64 |
| Noise | – | 62 |
| Treadwear | 68 | 54 |
| Handling (owners) | 67 | 63 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
MultiSeason
Alenza AS Ultra
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A MultiSeason
Pros
- Exceptional traction and grip in snow and icy conditions
- Strong value proposition compared to premium competitors
- Reliable performance for daily commuting in varied climates
Cons
- Inconsistent wet weather grip, particularly during cornering
- Reports of elevated road noise levels for some users
- Potential for premature tread wear depending on driving conditions
Tire B Alenza AS Ultra
Pros
- Strong traction on both wet and dry road surfaces
- Improved ride comfort and handling compared to some factory-installed alternatives
- Capable performance in varied weather conditions for some users
Cons
- Reports of premature tread wear and short service life
- Noticeable road noise compared to other premium tires
- Inconsistent performance in severe winter conditions, particularly on ice and deep snow
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Firestone MultiSeason | B · Bridgestone Alenza AS Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All Season | All Season |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | SUV and 4x4 |
| Sizes available | 22 | 46 |
| Rim diameters | 13″ – 16″ | 16″ – 22″ |
| Tread depth | — | 10/32″ |
| UTQG | — | 800 A A |
| Treadwear warranty | — | 80,000 mi |
| Sidewall | — | Blackwall |
| Max pressure | — | 44 psi |
| Sizes in common | 0 | 0 |
Which one should you actually buy?
Firestone MultiSeason
Bridgestone Alenza AS Ultra
Narrow edge: Firestone MultiSeason — better treadwear. It leads or ties in every category we score. Firestone MultiSeason rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 10 reviews), so read this result as provisional. Bridgestone Alenza AS Ultra rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 13 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Firestone MultiSeason scores 68 vs 54 on treadwear.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
MultiSeason or Alenza AS Ultra?
Which is better in the wet, MultiSeason or Alenza AS Ultra?
Neither, by our numbers: 70 vs 69 on the wet score, within 3 points.
Which grips better on dry roads, MultiSeason or Alenza AS Ultra?
Neither, by our numbers: 67 vs 66 on the dry score, within 3 points.
Which is better in snow, MultiSeason or Alenza AS Ultra?
Neither, by our numbers: 72 vs 70 on the snow score, within 3 points.
Which is more comfortable, MultiSeason or Alenza AS Ultra?
Neither, by our numbers: 66 vs 64 on the comfort score, within 3 points.
Which lasts longer, MultiSeason or Alenza AS Ultra?
Firestone MultiSeason, 68 vs 54 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology