Head-to-head Updated

Firestone MultiSeason vs Bridgestone Alenza AS Ultra — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 10 + 13 owner reviews. How we score

MultiSeason leads, 69–65 Narrow edge

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Firestone MultiSeason
Tire AFirestone

MultiSeason

All Season

± 8Provisional

Tests – · none yet Owners 69 · 10 reviews

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 67

    Dry

    MultiSeason +1
    66
    Why this score
    SourceMultiSeasonAlenza AS Ultra
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 67 (est.)≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online6765

    MultiSeason: 60% × 67.4 (est.) + 40% × 66.6 = 67

    Alenza AS Ultra: 60% × 66.6 (est.) + 40% × 64.7 = 66

    No road tests of dry for MultiSeason. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).

    No road tests of dry for Alenza AS Ultra. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).

  2. 70

    Wet

    MultiSeason +1
    69
    Why this score
    SourceMultiSeasonAlenza AS Ultra
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 70 (est.)≈ 70 (est.)
    Reviews found online7069

    MultiSeason: 60% × 70.4 (est.) + 40% × 70.2 = 70

    Alenza AS Ultra: 60% × 69.7 (est.) + 40% × 68.8 = 69

    No road tests of wet for MultiSeason. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

    No road tests of wet for Alenza AS Ultra. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. 72

    Snow

    MultiSeason +2
    70
    Why this score
    SourceMultiSeasonAlenza AS Ultra
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 71 (est.)≈ 70 (est.)
    Reviews found online7369

    MultiSeason: 60% × 71.2 (est.) + 40% × 72.6 = 72

    Alenza AS Ultra: 60% × 70 (est.) + 40% × 68.9 = 70

    No road tests of snow for MultiSeason. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).

    No road tests of snow for Alenza AS Ultra. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).

  4. 66

    Comfort

    MultiSeason +2
    64
    Why this score
    SourceMultiSeasonAlenza AS Ultra
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 68 (est.)≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online6562

    MultiSeason: 40% × 68 (est.) + 60% × 65.2 = 66

    Alenza AS Ultra: 40% × 67.3 (est.) + 60% × 62.1 = 64

    No road tests of comfort for MultiSeason. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

    No road tests of comfort for Alenza AS Ultra. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

  5. –

    Noise

    No comparison
    62
    Why this score
    SourceMultiSeasonAlenza AS Ultra
    Professional tests (TWG score)–≈ 66 (est.)
    Reviews found online–56

    Alenza AS Ultra: 60% × 66.4 (est.) + 40% × 56 = 62

    No road tests of noise for Alenza AS Ultra. The test half is the tested tires’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 68

    Treadwear

    MultiSeason +14
    54
    Why this score
    SourceMultiSeasonAlenza AS Ultra
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 67 (est.)≈ 59 (est.)
    Reviews found online6846

    MultiSeason: 60% × 67.1 (est.) + 40% × 68.2 = 68

    Alenza AS Ultra: 60% × 59.3 (est.) + 40% × 46.4 = 54

    No road tests of treadwear for MultiSeason. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

    No road tests of treadwear for Alenza AS Ultra. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

  7. 67

    Handling (owners)

    MultiSeason +4
    63
    Why this score
    SourceMultiSeasonAlenza AS Ultra
    Reviews found online6763
Scores at a glance
Firestone MultiSeason vs Bridgestone Alenza AS Ultra: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryFirestone MultiSeasonBridgestone Alenza AS Ultra
Relative Score 69 65
Dry 67 66
Wet 70 69
Snow 72 70
Comfort 66 64
Noise – 62
Treadwear 68 54
Handling (owners) 67 63

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
± 8

MultiSeason

± 8

Alenza AS Ultra

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A MultiSeason

Pros

  • Exceptional traction and grip in snow and icy conditions
  • Strong value proposition compared to premium competitors
  • Reliable performance for daily commuting in varied climates

Cons

  • Inconsistent wet weather grip, particularly during cornering
  • Reports of elevated road noise levels for some users
  • Potential for premature tread wear depending on driving conditions
All owner themes in the MultiSeason review

Tire B Alenza AS Ultra

Pros

  • Strong traction on both wet and dry road surfaces
  • Improved ride comfort and handling compared to some factory-installed alternatives
  • Capable performance in varied weather conditions for some users

Cons

  • Reports of premature tread wear and short service life
  • Noticeable road noise compared to other premium tires
  • Inconsistent performance in severe winter conditions, particularly on ice and deep snow
All owner themes in the Alenza AS Ultra review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Firestone MultiSeason B · Bridgestone Alenza AS Ultra
CategoryAll SeasonAll Season
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverSUV and 4x4
Sizes available2246
Rim diameters13″ – 16″16″ – 22″
Tread depth—10/32″
UTQG—800 A A
Treadwear warranty—80,000 mi
Sidewall—Blackwall
Max pressure—44 psi
Sizes in common00

Which one should you actually buy?

Firestone MultiSeason

Bridgestone Alenza AS Ultra

Narrow edge: Firestone MultiSeason — better treadwear. It leads or ties in every category we score. Firestone MultiSeason rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 10 reviews), so read this result as provisional. Bridgestone Alenza AS Ultra rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 13 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire A You want the longest tread life

Firestone MultiSeason scores 68 vs 54 on treadwear.

Tire A · Firestone MultiSeason
Tire B · Bridgestone Alenza AS Ultra

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

MultiSeason or Alenza AS Ultra?

Which is better in the wet, MultiSeason or Alenza AS Ultra?

Neither, by our numbers: 70 vs 69 on the wet score, within 3 points.

Which grips better on dry roads, MultiSeason or Alenza AS Ultra?

Neither, by our numbers: 67 vs 66 on the dry score, within 3 points.

Which is better in snow, MultiSeason or Alenza AS Ultra?

Neither, by our numbers: 72 vs 70 on the snow score, within 3 points.

Which is more comfortable, MultiSeason or Alenza AS Ultra?

Neither, by our numbers: 66 vs 64 on the comfort score, within 3 points.

Which lasts longer, MultiSeason or Alenza AS Ultra?

Firestone MultiSeason, 68 vs 54 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology