Head-to-head Updated

Firestone Firehawk Indy 500 vs Kumho Ecsta LE Sport — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 1 + 0 road tests and 1,457 + 33 owner reviews. How we score

Firehawk Indy 500 is ahead, 69–62

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Firestone Firehawk Indy 500
± 7

Tests – · 1 test Owners 62 · 1,457 reviews

Best test result: #6 of 22 in 2022 Consumer Reports Ultra High Performance Summer Tires (tested tread life (miles))

“I just put Firestone Firehawk Indy 500's on my NC2 and I like them and would recommend them. I paid about $635 with installation at Costco but you might even be able to find them for less elsewhere.”

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 74

    Dry

    Firehawk Indy 500 +13
    61
    Why this score
    SourceFirehawk Indy 500Ecsta LE Sport
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 72 (est.)≈ 63 (est.)
    Reviews found online7857

    Firehawk Indy 500: 60% × 72.1 (est.) + 40% × 77.6 = 74

    Ecsta LE Sport: 60% × 63.3 (est.) + 40% × 56.6 = 61

    No road tests of dry for Firehawk Indy 500. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).

    No road tests of dry for Ecsta LE Sport. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).

  2. 67

    Wet

    Firehawk Indy 500 +2
    65
    Why this score
    SourceFirehawk Indy 500Ecsta LE Sport
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 68 (est.)≈ 66 (est.)
    Reviews found online6563

    Firehawk Indy 500: 60% × 67.6 (est.) + 40% × 65.1 = 67

    Ecsta LE Sport: 60% × 66.4 (est.) + 40% × 62.9 = 65

    No road tests of wet for Firehawk Indy 500. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

    No road tests of wet for Ecsta LE Sport. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. 44

    Snow

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceFirehawk Indy 500Ecsta LE Sport
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 55 (est.)–
    Reviews found online28–

    Firehawk Indy 500: 60% × 54.7 (est.) + 40% × 27.8 = 44

    No road tests of snow for Firehawk Indy 500. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).

  4. 66

    Comfort

    Firehawk Indy 500 +4
    62
    Why this score
    SourceFirehawk Indy 500Ecsta LE Sport
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 68 (est.)≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online6459

    Firehawk Indy 500: 40% × 68.3 (est.) + 60% × 64.4 = 66

    Ecsta LE Sport: 40% × 67.3 (est.) + 60% × 58.9 = 62

    No road tests of comfort for Firehawk Indy 500 or Ecsta LE Sport. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. 66

    Noise

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceFirehawk Indy 500Ecsta LE Sport
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 67 (est.)–
    Reviews found online65–

    Firehawk Indy 500: 60% × 66.6 (est.) + 40% × 64.8 = 66

    No road tests of noise for Firehawk Indy 500. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 66

    Treadwear

    Firehawk Indy 500 +6
    60
    Why this score
    SourceFirehawk Indy 500Ecsta LE Sport
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests70≈ 62 (est.)
    Reviews found online6155

    Firehawk Indy 500: 60% × 70.2 + 40% × 60.7 = 66

    Ecsta LE Sport: 60% × 62.3 (est.) + 40% × 55.3 = 60

    No road tests of treadwear for Ecsta LE Sport. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).

  7. 71

    Handling (owners)

    Firehawk Indy 500 +11
    60
    Why this score
    SourceFirehawk Indy 500Ecsta LE Sport
    Reviews found online7160
Scores at a glance
Firestone Firehawk Indy 500 vs Kumho Ecsta LE Sport: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryFirestone Firehawk Indy 500Kumho Ecsta LE Sport
Relative Score 69 62
Dry 74 61
Wet 67 65
Snow 44 –
Comfort 66 62
Noise 66 –
Treadwear 66 60
Handling (owners) 71 60

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
± 7

Firehawk Indy 500

± 8

Ecsta LE Sport

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

The professional test results behind the scores

Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.

DisciplineCategoryFirehawk Indy 500Ecsta LE SportΔHead-to-head
Also published by the testers (not in the score)
Overall Ranking Overall #9/22 2022 Consumer Reports Ultra High Performance Summer Tires #10/11 2018 Auto Review 225/45 R17 Tyre Test – Different tests

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Firehawk Indy 500

Pros

  • Exceptional value and affordability compared to premium tier brands like Michelin
  • Outstanding dry grip and confident, responsive cornering capabilities
  • Surprisingly quiet and comfortable ride quality on the highway

Cons

  • Accelerated tread wear and shorter overall lifespan
  • Poor performance and loss of traction in cold temperatures (below 40°F)
  • Vulnerability to hydroplaning or reduced traction in heavy standing water
All owner themes in the Firehawk Indy 500 review

Tire B Ecsta LE Sport

Pros

  • Exceptional value compared to premium tier brands
  • Strong dry and wet road grip when relatively new
  • Predictable and progressive handling limits near the edge

Cons

  • Rapid and uneven tread wear, particularly on front or driven wheels
  • Fragile sidewalls prone to bubbling or damage from minor impacts
  • Noticeable drop-off in performance and increased tramlining as the tread wears down
All owner themes in the Ecsta LE Sport review

What real owners are saying

From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score

Tire A

Firestone Firehawk Indy 500

Positive

Community sentiment toward the Firestone Firehawk Indy 500 is overwhelmingly positive, with drivers frequently praising it as an exceptional value and budget-friendly alternative to premium summer tires. Owners report strong dry grip, solid wet-weather traction, good comfort, and predictable handling, though some note reduced performance in cold temperatures, softer sidewalls, and a tendency to get greasy during aggressive track sessions. Interest is also growing around the newer V2 version and its updated compound and tread design.

s197forum.com ·2018-03-14

“I have them on my 14 GT. 255 front/285 rear. They have roughly 5k on them and have worn well. Wheel spin has to be intentionally induced now. No more surprises. Highly recommend.”

r/tires ·1 upvote ·2026-07-25

“Firehawk Indy 500 v2: Summer or All Season Just went to the local Firestone store to get tires. I needed to replace all four (front two for wear and back two from damage to one of them). I expressly asked for non-summer tires. We live in Texas, but it does get below 32 here. This is for a 2019 Genesis G80 Sport 3.3T. They sold me Firehawk Indy 500 v2 tires, even after I confirmed three times that they were not summer tires. The third time I even showed them on my phone and they were adamant that they show as All Season in their system. Did I just get punked? The only thing I could fine about temperature on their website was that these tires have basically a 0 rating for ice. In other articles, they show as dangerous for anything below 40 degrees Fahrenheit . Am I being overconcerned, and it'll be fine here in Texas? Is this something I need to get them to resolve (different tires) or should I go someplace else for tires and return these for my money back?”

r/FiestaST ·22 upvotes ·2018-04-09

“Firestone Firehawk Indy 500 Tire Review After my stock rubber wore down I decided to look into other (cheaper) options for this summer. I landed on getting a set of Firestone Firehawk Indy 500 205/40/17 tires and have been on them for about a week now in both rain and dry. The TLDR of this would be buy these tires! The longer version of it is that these tires to me at least feel much more comfortable than the stock tires both in terms of ride comfort and road noise. On top of that the grip in the wet is impressive to say the least! I got a lot of rain here in Oregon so wet performance was really important to me. On the stock tires I always left my TC on and was careful going around turns especially as the tires wore down further and further. These Indy 500 just keep on gripping in the wet and I haven't had any problems at all. The first day I had them out in the dry I would have sworn my car was actually faster accelerating! Probably because there was less wheel hopping or it simply just grabbed the road better. I haven't tried a launch on them yet but hope to do some auto-crossing and such in the Spring. If you have any questions about these things fire away. Read more”

Top themes
#value and pricing#dry grip and traction#wet weather handling#track and autocross use#cold temperature limitations#ride comfort and road noise#Firehawk Indy 500 V2

Based on 146 community posts

Tire B

Kumho Ecsta LE Sport

We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Firestone Firehawk Indy 500 B · Kumho Ecsta LE Sport
CategorySummerSummer
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available47—
Rim diameters16″ – 20″—
Tread depth9 - 10/32″—
UTQG340 A A—
SidewallBlack Side Wall—
Max pressure50 - 51 psi—

Which one should you actually buy?

Firestone Firehawk Indy 500

Kumho Ecsta LE Sport

Winner: Firestone Firehawk Indy 500 — better dry, handling and treadwear. It leads or ties in every category we score.

Pick tire A You want the most grip on dry roads

Firestone Firehawk Indy 500 scores 74 vs 61 on dry.

Pick tire A You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Firestone Firehawk Indy 500 scores 71 vs 60 on handling.

Pick tire A You want the longest tread life

Firestone Firehawk Indy 500 scores 66 vs 60 on treadwear.

Pick tire A You want the most comfortable ride

Firestone Firehawk Indy 500 scores 66 vs 62 on comfort.

Tire A · Firestone Firehawk Indy 500
Tire B · Kumho Ecsta LE Sport

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Firehawk Indy 500 or Ecsta LE Sport?

Which is better in the wet, Firehawk Indy 500 or Ecsta LE Sport?

Neither, by our numbers: 67 vs 65 on the wet score, within 3 points.

Which grips better on dry roads, Firehawk Indy 500 or Ecsta LE Sport?

Firestone Firehawk Indy 500, 74 vs 61 on our dry score.

Which is more comfortable, Firehawk Indy 500 or Ecsta LE Sport?

Firestone Firehawk Indy 500, 66 vs 62 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, Firehawk Indy 500 or Ecsta LE Sport?

Firestone Firehawk Indy 500, 66 vs 60 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology