tirewheelguide
Head-to-head Updated

Firestone Multihawk vs Laufenn S Fit EQ+ — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): 60% professional tests, 40% owner reviews.

S Fit EQ+ leads, 72–68 Narrow edge

Check price on Amazon · S Fit EQ+ or Multihawk on Amazon
Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Tire AFirestone

Multihawk

Summer

Tests – · none yet Owners 69 · 16 reviews

Best test result: #8 of 15 in 2011 European Summer Tyre Test - 175/65 R14 (overall ranking)

Tire BLaufenn

S Fit EQ+

Summer

Tests 66 · 11 tests Owners 78 · 11 reviews

Best test result: #14 of 49 in 2020 Tyre Market Overview Braking Test (overall ranking)

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 69

    Dry

    S Fit EQ+ +12
    81
    Why this score
    SourceMultihawkS Fit EQ+
    Professional tests (TWG score)–79
    Reviews found online7084
  2. 70

    Wet

    S Fit EQ+ +4
    74
    Why this score
    SourceMultihawkS Fit EQ+
    Professional tests (TWG score)–73
    Reviews found online7076
  3. 66

    Comfort

    S Fit EQ+ +4
    70
    Why this score
    SourceMultihawkS Fit EQ+
    Professional tests (TWG score)–66
    Reviews found online6375
  4. –

    Noise

    No comparison
    73
    Why this score
    SourceMultihawkS Fit EQ+
    Professional tests (TWG score)–76
  5. 66

    Treadwear

    Multihawk +12
    54
    Why this score
    SourceMultihawkS Fit EQ+
    Professional tests (TWG score)–42
    Reviews found online6773
  6. 70

    Handling

    S Fit EQ+ +12
    82
    Why this score
    SourceMultihawkS Fit EQ+
    Reviews found online7082
Scores at a glance
CategoryFirestone MultihawkLaufenn S Fit EQ+
Relative Score 68 72
Dry 69 81
Wet 70 74
Comfort 66 70
Noise – 73
Treadwear 66 54
Handling 70 82

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Less important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Less important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost

Neither tire has a score here yet, so this weight changes nothing.

Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Multihawk

S Fit EQ+

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

The professional test results behind the scores

Each result is shown as % of the best tire in that test. “Same test” rows are the strictest comparison: both tires were measured side by side.

DisciplineCategoryMultihawkS Fit EQ+ΔBoth?
Overall Ranking Overall 13% #8/15 · 2011 European Summer Tyre Test - 175/65 R14 7% #14/49 · 2020 Tyre Market Overview Braking Test +5.4 Different tests

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Multihawk

Pros

  • Excellent price-to-performance ratio
  • Strong dry-weather grip and handling
  • Quiet and comfortable ride quality for daily commuting

Cons

  • Inconsistent wet-weather traction
  • Reports of premature tread wear or structural issues
  • Twitchy handling on uneven or poor road surfaces
All owner themes in the Multihawk review

Tire B S Fit EQ+

Pros

  • Exceptional value and lower price point compared to premium brands
  • Strong dry and wet road grip with stable handling
  • Good fuel economy and low rolling resistance

Cons

  • Increased road noise reported by some users
  • Stiffer ride quality or firmness in colder conditions (below 10°C)
  • Concerns regarding sidewall stiffness and occasional manufacturing flaws (e.g., a hump in one tire)
All owner themes in the S Fit EQ+ review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Firestone Multihawk B · Laufenn S Fit EQ+
CategorySummerSummer
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available—74
Rim diameters—15″ – 20″

Which one should you actually buy?

Firestone Multihawk

Laufenn S Fit EQ+

Winner: Laufenn S Fit EQ+ — better dry, handling and wet. Pick the Firestone Multihawk if treadwear matters most to you.

Pick tire A You want the longest tread life

Firestone Multihawk scores 66 vs 54 on treadwear.

Pick tire B You want the most grip on dry roads

Laufenn S Fit EQ+ scores 81 vs 69 on dry.

Pick tire B You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Laufenn S Fit EQ+ scores 82 vs 70 on handling.

Pick tire B Your priority is wet-weather safety

Laufenn S Fit EQ+ scores 74 vs 70 on wet.

Tire A · Firestone Multihawk
Check price on Amazon
Tire B · Laufenn S Fit EQ+
Check price on Amazon

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.

72

Narrow edge

S Fit EQ+

Amazon