Head-to-head Updated

Firestone MultiSeason vs Michelin Agilis CrossClimate — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 3 road tests and 10 + 1,072 owner reviews. How we score

Agilis CrossClimate is ahead, 78–69

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Firestone MultiSeason
Tire AFirestone

MultiSeason

All Season

± 8Provisional

Tests – · none yet Owners 69 · 10 reviews

Michelin Agilis CrossClimate
Tire BMichelin

Agilis CrossClimate

All Season

± 6

Tests 72 · 3 tests Owners 85 · 1,072 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 7 in 2020 Commercial Van All Season Tyre Test (dry braking)

“We have the Agilis cross climates on our C-class 3.5t MH and have been utterly delighted with them. They’re quiet, really grippy and give a great ride. What’s not to like?”

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 67

    Dry

    Agilis CrossClimate +12
    79
    Why this score
    SourceMultiSeasonAgilis CrossClimate
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 3 tests≈ 67 (est.)74
    Reviews found online6787

    MultiSeason: 60% × 67.4 (est.) + 40% × 66.6 = 67

    Agilis CrossClimate: 60% × 74.3 + 40% × 87 = 79

    No road tests of dry for MultiSeason. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).

  2. 70

    Wet

    Agilis CrossClimate +8
    78
    Why this score
    SourceMultiSeasonAgilis CrossClimate
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 3 tests≈ 70 (est.)71
    Reviews found online7088

    MultiSeason: 60% × 70.4 (est.) + 40% × 70.2 = 70

    Agilis CrossClimate: 60% × 71.1 + 40% × 87.8 = 78

    No road tests of wet for MultiSeason. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. 72

    Snow

    Agilis CrossClimate +6
    78
    Why this score
    SourceMultiSeasonAgilis CrossClimate
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 3 tests≈ 71 (est.)76
    Reviews found online7382

    MultiSeason: 60% × 71.2 (est.) + 40% × 72.6 = 72

    Agilis CrossClimate: 60% × 75.6 + 40% × 81.6 = 78

    No road tests of snow for MultiSeason. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).

  4. 66

    Comfort

    Agilis CrossClimate +5
    71
    Why this score
    SourceMultiSeasonAgilis CrossClimate
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests≈ 68 (est.)55
    Reviews found online6581

    MultiSeason: 40% × 68 (est.) + 60% × 65.2 = 66

    Agilis CrossClimate: 40% × 54.8 + 60% × 81.1 = 71

    No road tests of comfort for MultiSeason. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

  5. –

    Noise

    No comparison
    76
    Why this score
    SourceMultiSeasonAgilis CrossClimate
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 2 tests–82
    Reviews found online–≈ 66 (est.)

    Agilis CrossClimate: 60% × 82 + 40% × 66.4 (est.) = 76

    No owner ratings of noise for Agilis CrossClimate. The owner half is the owners’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.

  6. 68

    Treadwear

    Agilis CrossClimate +10
    78
    Why this score
    SourceMultiSeasonAgilis CrossClimate
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 67 (est.)≈ 73 (est.)
    Reviews found online6885

    MultiSeason: 60% × 67.1 (est.) + 40% × 68.2 = 68

    Agilis CrossClimate: 60% × 73.2 (est.) + 40% × 85 = 78

    No road tests of treadwear for MultiSeason. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

    No road tests of treadwear for Agilis CrossClimate. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

  7. 67

    Handling (owners)

    Agilis CrossClimate +14
    81
    Why this score
    SourceMultiSeasonAgilis CrossClimate
    Reviews found online6781
  8. –

    Efficiency

    No comparison
    71
    Why this score
    SourceMultiSeasonAgilis CrossClimate
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 2 tests–71
Scores at a glance
Firestone MultiSeason vs Michelin Agilis CrossClimate: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryFirestone MultiSeasonMichelin Agilis CrossClimate
Relative Score 69 78
Dry 67 79
Wet 70 78
Snow 72 78
Comfort 66 71
Noise – 76
Treadwear 68 78
Handling (owners) 67 81
Efficiency – 71

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Recomputed
Headline score
± 8

MultiSeason

± 6

Agilis CrossClimate

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

The professional test results behind the scores

Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.

DisciplineCategoryMultiSeasonAgilis CrossClimateΔHead-to-head
Also published by the testers (not in the score)
Overall Ranking Overall #5/9 2018 ADAC All Season Tyre Test #2/6 promobil 2026 All Season Motorhome and Van Tyre Test – Different tests

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A MultiSeason

Pros

  • Exceptional traction and grip in snow and icy conditions
  • Strong value proposition compared to premium competitors
  • Reliable performance for daily commuting in varied climates

Cons

  • Inconsistent wet weather grip, particularly during cornering
  • Reports of elevated road noise levels for some users
  • Potential for premature tread wear depending on driving conditions
All owner themes in the MultiSeason review

Tire B Agilis CrossClimate

Pros

  • Outstanding wet and winter weather traction
  • Exceptional tread life and long-term durability
  • Stiff sidewalls providing enhanced cornering stability and handling

Cons

  • Slightly higher road noise or low drone at certain speeds
  • Higher initial purchase price compared to standard options
  • A few reports of a minor decrease in fuel economy
All owner themes in the Agilis CrossClimate review

What real owners are saying

From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score

Tire A

Firestone MultiSeason

We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.

Tire B

Michelin Agilis CrossClimate

Positive

Community sentiment toward the Michelin Agilis CrossClimate is largely positive, with owners of vans, RVs, and heavy-duty trucks praising its wet and snow traction, quiet ride, and capability under heavy loads. However, discussions frequently highlight trade-offs such as faster tread wear compared to the Defender series and concerns regarding an NHTSA recall on certain C-metric sizes for snow traction marking non-compliance. Prospective buyers also note confusion regarding the differing directional C-metric and non-directional LT-metric designs.

forum.ih8mud.com ·5 upvotes ·2019-10-17

“Just an update. I emailed Michelin about the Agilis vs. Defender: My email: I am thinking of using LT 275/65/18 for my Land Cruiser. I cannot decide between Michelin Defender vs. Agilis CrossClimate. I do plan on taking my car off-roading over mild terrain (more rocky, less mud). My Land Cruiser is around 6000 lbs. I read that Agilis has double the nylon reinforcement as Defender and has a tougher sidewall. Are these things true? Is Agilis a tougher tire? On-road, is Agilis as quiet as Defender? How is the rolling resistance between the two (same size)? Thank you in advance. -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Michelin’s response: We would like to thank you for contacting us! We would recommend that Michelin Defender LTX M/S tires for your luxury SUV. The Michelin Defender LTX M/S tires are going to be quieter, due to the tread grooves been closer. Also, the rolling resistance will be a little better. The Michelin Agilis Cross Climate is an excellent tire that serves well for all weather performance and built with a little more strength for more heavier larger vehicles, like 2500 or 3500 trucks.”

bobistheoilguy.com ·2025-10-26

“Looking to replace my summer tires for my work van. I carry about 2,000 lbs of cargo and have another set of wheels&tires for snow. These would just be for pavement/highway use. Im looking for quiet ride and longevity. Factory size is LT225/75R16 which id like to stick to. Ive worn out some Michelin Agilis Cross Climate in about 60,000 miles. It looks like Michelin now calls the Agilis Cross Climate which i currently have the Cross Climate2. Looking for something similar. The Michelins are spendy, wondering if ill be happy with something different. Was looking at Firestone Transforce as a possibility. Open to any ideas and the collective experience of those here.”

airforums.com ·2021-06-28

“Yup. I currently have CrossClimate Load E on the front, and CrossClimate C-type on the rear. The van has never had a better ride. (Note to readers who are less familiar with different Interstate model years - mine is not a dually. I only have two tires to carry the butt-heavy rear, so the load rating consideration takes on an outsized importance). Price is the same, to within about ten bucks. C-type is not more expensive. The published disadvantage is a stiffer ride. But the ride is harsh anyway - we have discussed that ad nauseam on this forum. I don’t find that to be a deal-breaker for a tire with a larger load-carrying capacity. Especially given the still-unexplained blow-out I had with the lower-capacity tire. Back in the Catastrophic blowout thread, I mentioned that the C-type CrossClimate is not advertised. I had to have a Discount Tire CSR point me to their page for it. There’s a screengrab of it on that thread.”

Top themes
#Heavy load capability#Winter and snow traction#Tread wear longevity#Defender LTX comparison#C-metric recall notice#Ride comfort and noise#Van and RV use

Based on 54 community posts

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Firestone MultiSeason B · Michelin Agilis CrossClimate
CategoryAll SeasonAll Season
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverVan
Sizes available2222
Rim diameters13″ – 16″15″ – 17″
Sizes in common22

Which one should you actually buy?

Firestone MultiSeason

Michelin Agilis CrossClimate

Winner: Michelin Agilis CrossClimate — better handling, dry and treadwear. It leads or ties in every category we score. Firestone MultiSeason rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 10 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire B You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Michelin Agilis CrossClimate scores 81 vs 67 on handling.

Pick tire B You want the most grip on dry roads

Michelin Agilis CrossClimate scores 79 vs 67 on dry.

Pick tire B You want the longest tread life

Michelin Agilis CrossClimate scores 78 vs 68 on treadwear.

Pick tire B Your priority is wet-weather safety

Michelin Agilis CrossClimate scores 78 vs 70 on wet.

Tire A · Firestone MultiSeason
Tire B · Michelin Agilis CrossClimate

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

MultiSeason or Agilis CrossClimate?

Which is better in the wet, MultiSeason or Agilis CrossClimate?

Michelin Agilis CrossClimate, 78 vs 70 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, MultiSeason or Agilis CrossClimate?

Michelin Agilis CrossClimate, 79 vs 67 on our dry score.

Which is better in snow, MultiSeason or Agilis CrossClimate?

Michelin Agilis CrossClimate, 78 vs 72 on our snow score.

Which is more comfortable, MultiSeason or Agilis CrossClimate?

Michelin Agilis CrossClimate, 71 vs 66 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, MultiSeason or Agilis CrossClimate?

Michelin Agilis CrossClimate, 78 vs 68 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology